Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-16 Thread Harbs
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 6:54 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 3/16/17, 9:41 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > >> So, as soon as you merge in dual, all the $displayObject references and >> all will be gone. Correct? > > I actually haven't done that yet ($displayObject points to itself), but I > guess I sho

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Ok Alex, thanks for clearing it 2017-03-16 18:49 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > > > On 3/16/17, 10:38 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" > > wrote: > > >So, in order to understand what I'm missing, "Basic" will be in the > >diagram > >I did in place of "FlexJS"? > > > >In Core be

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-16 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/16/17, 10:38 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >So, in order to understand what I'm missing, "Basic" will be in the >diagram >I did in place of "FlexJS"? > >In Core be should have things like UIBase, UIButtonBase, Container... >since >HTML (Div, H1, P...) will

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
So, in order to understand what I'm missing, "Basic" will be in the diagram I did in place of "FlexJS"? In Core be should have things like UIBase, UIButtonBase, Container... since HTML (Div, H1, P...) will need it. Then in Basic we should have FlexJS set (i.e: js:Button, js:TextInput, js:CheckBox

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-16 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/16/17, 9:44 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >2017-03-16 15:54 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > >> >> The components in the HTML project that are not direct wrappers (like A, >> Div, H1, etc) now live in the Basic folder. HTML will just contain >>these >

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-16 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/16/17, 9:41 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >So, as soon as you merge in dual, all the $displayObject references and >all will be gone. Correct? I actually haven't done that yet ($displayObject points to itself), but I guess I should go and do that. > >Sounds scary. > >I’d like to test my app on the

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex, 2017-03-16 15:54 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > > The components in the HTML project that are not direct wrappers (like A, > Div, H1, etc) now live in the Basic folder. HTML will just contain these > direct wrappers. > it's strange for me that refactor. I proposed just some time ago that HTM

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-16 Thread Harbs
So, as soon as you merge in dual, all the $displayObject references and all will be gone. Correct? Sounds scary. I’d like to test my app on the dual branch before you do the merge. I can’t afford a week of non-productivity right now. Can you wait until Sunday or Monday to merge to give me time

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-16 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/16/17, 12:37 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >I have not had the time. > >Is there anything to be aware of when you merge it in from an application >development stand-point? I was sort of wondering if it would compile a big app and produce a valid SWF and whether it would miss errors or report false-p

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-16 Thread Harbs
I have not had the time. Is there anything to be aware of when you merge it in from an application development stand-point? Have you done anything regarding the Basic vs. HTML projects? Harbs > On Mar 16, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Has anyone else looked at the dual branch? If

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-15 Thread Alex Harui
Has anyone else looked at the dual branch? If you want to know more about it before it gets merged let me know soon, otherwise I am going to merge it. Thanks, -Alex On 3/11/17, 10:49 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > >On 3/11/17, 10:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: > >>Hi Alex, >> >>I just had a loo

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-11 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/11/17, 10:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >I just had a look and the changes look valid. The only thing I think I >should change, is that it seems as if prior to your change, I needed two >compilations AS & JS and therefore there were two Mojos: CompileASMojo >and CompileJSMojo

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-11 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Alex, I just had a look and the changes look valid. The only thing I think I should change, is that it seems as if prior to your change, I needed two compilations AS & JS and therefore there were two Mojos: CompileASMojo and CompileJSMojo. I think now we need only one. If the current state i

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-10 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/10/17, 7:17 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >So I adjusted the native examples poms in your dual branch … now it seems >to build successfully with maven. Great! Thanks. Have you looked over the changes I made to the mojos? I'd like to merge this branch soon. Thanks, -Alex

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-10 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Alex, So I adjusted the native examples poms in your dual branch … now it seems to build successfully with maven. Chris Am 07.03.17, 17:29 schrieb "Alex Harui" : On 3/7/17, 4:36 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi guys and especially Alex, > >I would like to as

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-07 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/7/17, 4:36 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi guys and especially Alex, > >I would like to ask you to give a short summary at what you changed in >the dual branch. I don’t quite know as to what I should be looking for to >make Maven support to match. > >Could you please summarize what new co