On 3/11/17, 10:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Hi Alex, > >I just had a look and the changes look valid. The only thing I think I >should change, is that it seems as if prior to your change, I needed two >compilations AS & JS and therefore there were two Mojos: CompileASMojo >and CompileJSMojo. I think now we need only one. If the current state it >also looks as if both the AS and the JS mojo would do a dual compilation. > >If you confirm, that now I need only one Mojo, I would refactor it and >create a “CompileLibMojo” and remove the other two CompileASMojo and >CompileJSMojo. Well, we still build two SWCs per project. We might want to rename the Mojos, but the CompileASMojo builds a SWC that has a library.swf with COMPILE::SWF=true but includes JS files compiled with COMPILE::JS=true, then CompileJSMojo builds a SWC that has a library.swf with COMPILE::JS=true and the JS files with COMPILE::JS=true and the artifact has the -js classifier. At some point we can try combining the two and renaming one of the library.swf and catalog.xml files, but for now we still need a SWC with library.swf with COMPILE::SWF=true and a SWC with library.swf with COMPILE::JS=true. Thanks, -Alex
