Hi Alex,
That sounds very promising ☺ Looking forward to it.
Chris
Am 22.02.17, 17:13 schrieb "Alex Harui" :
On 2/22/17, 2:43 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well I guess the thing is that you are building a SWC.
>
>Till now we were expecting to build SWCs to be us
On 2/22/17, 2:43 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well I guess the thing is that you are building a SWC.
>
>Till now we were expecting to build SWCs to be usable in SWF and JS.
>Therefore we don’t have the concept of “pure JS swcs”.
>If this is a thing, eventually it would be good to define differ
Thanks Chris, as I state in the other thread fix works now and I can now
follow up with my duties in that library
thanks!
2017-02-22 13:24 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
> It should be:
>
>
> true
>
>
> But as I wrote in the other thread … seems to be broken atm and I’ll fix
> it as s
Hi Chris,
just updated and tried and seems compilation is now successful :)
I'll be trying now to incorporate the full spriteflexjs lib and see if
compile and works
thanks!
Carlos
2017-02-22 14:55 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
> Ok,
>
> So, I just updated the flexjs-maven-plugin to generate a d
Ok,
So, I just updated the flexjs-maven-plugin to generate a dummy SWC in case of a
skipped SWF compilation.
It was then possible to use the “true” config option and the
build of the spritejs swc worked as desired without the need to provide the
COMPILE:JS defines.
Please try out ☺
Chris
It should be:
true
But as I wrote in the other thread … seems to be broken atm and I’ll fix it as
soon as possible. But still I think this would produce output which isn’t
usable in normal flash projects so I think they should be distinguishable.
Chris
Am 22.02.17, 13:03 schri
Hi Carlos,
true
But is only valid for compiling applications … this doesn’t apply for swcs. For
SWC compilation you should use:
true
but I just tried that and it does seem to be causing problems … the plugin is
comping about not being able to find the SWC file … I’ll look into that right
aw
Hi Chris,
I searched for "outputJavaScript", but didn't found nothing. Is right
written?
thanks
2017-02-22 11:45 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
> Hi Carlos,
>
> As I responded in the other thread.
>
> We currently don’t have pure js swcs. We do have pure js applications and
> this can be dealt with
Hi Chris,
thanks, but I tried "skipAS=true” with
skipAS=true
and compilation fails in the same way
2017-02-22 12:13 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
> Hi,
>
> I just had another look at the mojo and you can suppress the AS
> compilation by setting “skipAS=true” … then you should prob
Hi,
I just had another look at the mojo and you can suppress the AS compilation by
setting “skipAS=true” … then you should probably be able to build without the
defines.
Chris
Am 22.02.17, 11:43 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Well I guess the thing is that you are building a SWC.
Ti
Hi Carlos,
As I responded in the other thread.
We currently don’t have pure js swcs. We do have pure js applications and this
can be dealt with by the “outputJavaScript” config option, but I am not really
happy with that right now.
Chris
Am 22.02.17, 10:45 schrieb "carlos.rov...@gmail.com im
Well I guess the thing is that you are building a SWC.
Till now we were expecting to build SWCs to be usable in SWF and JS. Therefore
we don’t have the concept of “pure JS swcs”.
If this is a thing, eventually it would be good to define different naming:
- swc (pure flash)
- js (pure js)
- jswc (
@Chris, do we have some example of a pom that only target JS?
Or, if there's some way to do it, can you share the piece of config I
should use? (or even, change the pom in the spriteflexjs branch)
thanks
2017-02-22 8:51 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
>
> On 2/21/17, 11:40 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>
On 2/21/17, 11:40 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>COMPILE::JS and COMPILE:SWC are just regular compile-time constants. As
>far
>as I know, they receive no special treatment from the compiler. It's just
>a
>convention used by the FlexJS framework projects to make the components
>exclude certain code
COMPILE::JS and COMPILE:SWC are just regular compile-time constants. As far
as I know, they receive no special treatment from the compiler. It's just a
convention used by the FlexJS framework projects to make the components
exclude certain code on some platforms. If you're targeting one platform,
t
15 matches
Mail list logo
