It should be:
<configuration>
<skipAS>true</skipAS>
</configuration>
But as I wrote in the other thread … seems to be broken atm and I’ll fix it as
soon as possible. But still I think this would produce output which isn’t
usable in normal flash projects so I think they should be distinguishable.
Chris
Am 22.02.17, 13:03 schrieb "carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos
Rovira" <carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>:
Hi Chris,
thanks, but I tried "skipAS=true” with
<configuration>
<additionalCompilerOptions>skipAS=true</additionalCompilerOptions>
and compilation fails in the same way
2017-02-22 12:13 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
> Hi,
>
> I just had another look at the mojo and you can suppress the AS
> compilation by setting “skipAS=true” … then you should probably be able to
> build without the defines.
>
> Chris
>
> Am 22.02.17, 11:43 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
>
> Well I guess the thing is that you are building a SWC.
>
> Till now we were expecting to build SWCs to be usable in SWF and JS.
> Therefore we don’t have the concept of “pure JS swcs”.
> If this is a thing, eventually it would be good to define different
> naming:
> - swc (pure flash)
> - js (pure js)
> - jswc (both js and flash)
>
> This could make things easier with the externs/typedefs as these would
> be “js” type with scope “provided” …
>
> What do the others think? Would require quite a major refactoring of
> the poms and a slight adjustement of the maven plugin. But I think it
would
> make things clearer.
>
> Chris
>
> Am 22.02.17, 08:51 schrieb "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com>:
>
>
>
> On 2/21/17, 11:40 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >COMPILE::JS and COMPILE:SWC are just regular compile-time
> constants. As
> >far
> >as I know, they receive no special treatment from the compiler.
> It's just
> >a
> >convention used by the FlexJS framework projects to make the
> components
> >exclude certain code on some platforms. If you're targeting one
> platform,
> >there shouldn't be any need to exclude anything, so this project
> shouldn't
> >need COMPILE::JS at all.
> >
> >Why do you feel that COMPILE::JS is needed?
>
> I think because Maven automatically plugs in playerglobal or
> airglobal for
> the SWF build of a SWC. I think Maven has some skip options that
> can go
> in the POM?
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
