Hi,
> Regarding the LICENSE in the ASDoc package: Did you see other content in
> there that needs mentioning in LICENSE or is the ALv2 sufficient.
Nothing I could see, just a straight boiler plate Apache 2.0 LICENSE is
required I think.
BYW having extra info in LICENSE while incorrect is a lic
On 3/29/16, 12:20 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>>I need to do more testing of the install script changes before creating
>> another RC.
>
>Perhaps give people a little more time to look at the FlexJS RC as it may
>save another RC if an issue is found? I’ll post my vote s it contains a
>few other
HI,
> No word from designmodo yet. I've pushed changes to make the fonts an
> optional dependency.
That is also a valid way around the issue, but means more work for the user. [1]
> I need to do more testing of the install script changes before creating
> another RC.
Perhaps give people a litt
On 3/27/16, 10:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> OK, left them this issue
>> https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/issues/213
>
>Anyway fingers crossed they get back to us and this can be resolved
>quickly.
No word from designmodo yet. I've pushed changes to make the fonts an
optional d
Thanks for the clarifications :)
I believe it might be good idea to use standard jar file locations
(like maven repo) and standard way of integration, and reduce
dependendency on people.a.o :)
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 3/28/16, 9:29 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrot
On 3/28/16, 9:29 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrote:
>Hello Alex,
>
>just curious, why are you using
>http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
>instead of
>http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.8/apache-rat-0.8
>.jar
>(or even better
>http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/
Hello Alex,
just curious, why are you using
http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
instead of
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.8/apache-rat-0.8.jar
(or even better
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.11/apache-rat-0.11.jar)
?
additi
Ah yes, people.apache.org is no more. I pushed a new approval script.
Please download it and try again.
-Alex
On 3/28/16, 6:17 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
>Had an error running the ApproveFlexJS.xml
>
>
>
>D:\PortableDev\FlexJS>ant -e -f ApproveFlexJS.xml -Drelease.version=0.6.0
>-Drc=1
>
>Build
Had an error running the ApproveFlexJS.xml
D:\PortableDev\FlexJS>ant -e -f ApproveFlexJS.xml -Drelease.version=0.6.0
-Drc=1
Buildfile: D:\PortableDev\FlexJS\ApproveFlexJS.xml
install-rat.jar:
Getting: http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar
To: D:\PortableDev\Ant\lib\apache-rat
Is your Falcon the RC I posted or a nightly? I wonder if it is related to
[1]
-Alex
[1] http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2014/04/01/jdk-compatibility.html
On 3/28/16, 3:42 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> On a Mac, when you do getInfo on a file, do those sharing and permission
>> settings map
> On a Mac, when you do getInfo on a file, do those sharing and permission
> settings map to the 777 bits or are the different?
They show up as read & write to me, staff and everyone.
> What version of Ant and Java are you using?
$ant -version
Apache Ant(TM) version 1.9.3 compiled on December 2
On 3/28/16, 3:18 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Check out compc.jar's permissions in:
>>
>>/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin
>>/c
>> ompiler/generated/dist/sdk
>
>No luck changing to 777 on the jar and directory and still got the same
>error :-(
>
Hi,
> Check out compc.jar's permissions in:
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/c
> ompiler/generated/dist/sdk
No luck changing to 777 on the jar and directory and still got the same error
:-(
java -jar compc.jar works as expected
ant -v showsthe excepti
Sorry, grabbed wrong line.
Check out compc.jar's permissions in:
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/c
ompiler/generated/dist/sdk
Not just its rwx bits, but any other OS-level user-level permissions.
-Alex
On 3/28/16, 1:06 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi
Hi,
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/l
> ib
I don’t have a lib directory - here what I have:
find . -name "*lib*"
./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/ant/lib
./compiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib
./compiler/lib
./compiler.tests/lib
./js/lib
./js/libs
./lib-legacy
Totally wild guess, but can you check permissions on compc.jar in
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/l
ib
I don't know the Ant flex-tasks code at all, but it looks like it is
simple Java doing a File.exists() on compc.jar.
-Alex
On 3/27/16, 10:41 PM, "Justi
Hi,
> I assumed since MIT is supposedly as friendly as Apache, that all licenses
> in an MIT package were also Category A or B.
Sadly this is not always the case for instance MIT is comparable with GPL but
that doesn't mean we can use a MIT licensed bundle containing GPL software in
Apache lice
Hi,
> How did you get your Falcon build? Is it just an unzip of a binary kit?
Yes it was.
I also tried installing over FlexJS it using the installer script provided but
that also gives an error:
From the FlexJS base directory:
ant -f ../../ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.6.0-bin/installe
On 3/27/16, 10:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> OK, left them this issue
>> https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/issues/213
>
>That probably could of been worded a little differently.
>
>If you look at the bundled SVG file you can clearly see what license it
>is under:
> "fontURL"
HI,
> OK, left them this issue
> https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/issues/213
That probably could of been worded a little differently.
If you look at the bundled SVG file you can clearly see what license it is
under:
"fontURL": "http://designmodo.com/flat";,
"designer": "Ser
OK, left them this issue
https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/issues/213
-Alex
On 3/27/16, 5:15 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>JFYI the owners of the code are fairly responsive to licence issues (for
>instance [1]) and tend to give permission to use their stuff (few other
>issues). I thin
On 3/27/16, 6:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>Unable to compile FlexJS - last bit:
>
>compile-extern-swc:
> [echo] Compiling target/externs/Core-0.6.0.swc
> [echo] FLEX_HOME:
>/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src
> [echo] FALCON_HOME:
>/Users
HI,
> compc.jar does exist in $ANT_HOME/lib so I’m not sure what causes the above
> issue. Anyone have any idea?
Sorry I meant to say flexTasks.jar not comic.jar there. Do we perhaps have an
issue with different versions of compc/flexTasks.jar?
Thanks,
Justin
HI,
Unable to compile FlexJS - last bit:
compile-extern-swc:
[echo] Compiling target/externs/Core-0.6.0.swc
[echo] FLEX_HOME:
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFlexJS/apache-flex-flexjs-0.6.0-src
[echo] FALCON_HOME:
/Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheFalcon/apache-flex-falconj
Hi,
JFYI the owners of the code are fairly responsive to licence issues (for
instance [1]) and tend to give permission to use their stuff (few other
issues). I think the simplest way to resolve this may be ask can we use the
font files under an more permissive / Apache compatible licence. We sh
Hi,
Just looking throuth the binary release and I notice that this file [1] is
licensed with a CC license [2] (look inside the file). Sadly this is not an
Apache compatible license. Anyone know the history of that file / can head some
light on this? The font has a URL with points to http://desi
26 matches
Mail list logo
