Thanks for the clarifications :) I believe it might be good idea to use standard jar file locations (like maven repo) and standard way of integration, and reduce dependendency on people.a.o :)
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 3/28/16, 9:29 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Hello Alex, >> >>just curious, why are you using >>http://people.apache.org/~aharui/rat/apache-rat-0.8.jar >>instead of >>http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.8/apache-rat-0.8 >>.jar >>(or even better >>http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.11/apache-rat-0. >>11.jar) >>? > > Way back when I first did this, 0.8 was what I had on my system, and I > didn't want to find out if the output format might change in newer > versions. The Ant script does some string replacement on the output to > try to make it easier to find binary files in the package. > > But I just made the switch to 0.11 and it seems ok. > > -Alex > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
