Re: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread piotrz
Hi Hugo, Since like Carlos I'm big fun of Intelij I'm using it to make fixes in FlexJS. Unfortunately the only thing which you can do is writing code and building using Maven.(encourage you to use it, cause setup of building is quite easy) You will not be able to debug your project due to not comp

Re: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Is there any table or similar mapping FlexJS vs AS (classes, components, > properties, methods...)? There is one of the wiki but only at the component level. Properties and methods are not always going to match the names of the FlexSDK and their may be some features missing on the Flex

RE: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread Virginia Westwood
@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: The state of FlexJS Hi, > Do you have any more complex sample with grids >From a few experiments I think data grids (if that is what you are referring >to) is going to be an area where FLexJS will need some more work but they are >supported currently. I

Re: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Do you have any more complex sample with grids From a few experiments I think data grids (if that is what you are referring to) is going to be an area where FLexJS will need some more work but they are supported currently. I’m not using data grids on this project. Until someone tries it

Re: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/1/17, 3:17 PM, "hferreira" wrote: >I have a licensed Ultimate IntelliJ IDEA and I love it ! If IntelliJ is a requirement, are you willing to spend some time trying to use the workarounds we know of, and/or try to find alternative solutions? IIRC, there is a workaround for code intelligen

Re: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread hferreira
Justin Mclean wrote > I’m surprised you list two-way binding as a needed feature I know that what one of the last features from the old Flex from Adobe but I use it a lot ! Justin Mclean wrote > Currently it requires some manual steps A lot of steps on my opinion that will discourage many devs

Re: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread hferreira
I have a licensed Ultimate IntelliJ IDEA and I love it ! Visual Studio Code seems a way back and for kids (sorry :)) For a very basic text editor I use Notepad++ on Windows and TextWrangler on Mac. I need to get time to go thru the process but a complex sample would break down barriers and would b

Re: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread Carlos Rovira
I started working on AMF3 a few days ago. Due to work I couldn't get my hands this days, but expect to get back to it ASAIC. For IDEA, I'm a big fan and supporter of IDEA IDE, and many folks here and using it already for FlexJS. However, I recommend you to check vscode+nextgenas, if you don't want,

Re: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > 1. Support communication with server-side thru AMF3 This is currently being worked on, performance however may be different. > 2. Support communication with server-side thru REST This is possible now and work quite well in my experience. > 3. Easy to build components like MXML Composing

Re: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread hferreira
IMO, it depends on how complex. We are looking for folks who are willing to put up with the rough edges and help us make FlexJS strong enough to support your application. It won't be like working with Flex 4.x. There will be lots of bugs and other issues, but we need real world applications

Re: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread Carlos Rovira
To append to what Alex said, I think is a good momento to jump to FlexJS and help development. I found somewhat affordable and end doing an entire library with Piotr (a library that implements the complete set of Material Design Library). For me, some months ago that was not possible, today I thin

Re: The state of FlexJS

2017-03-01 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/1/17, 6:43 AM, "hferreira" wrote: >Hello community, > >I just wanted to know that current state of FlexJS ? >Is still too far away to be considered for a complex application ? IMO, it depends on how complex. We are looking for folks who are willing to put up with the rough edges and help