convinced that the compiler should behave
>differently, but I see that Alex is quite right about static linking.
>This is very encouraging!!! Hopefully sometime next year we can add a
>facebook game to the list of applications that use Apache Flex! (don't
>expect it soon, I'
?
> >
> >It is my understanding that optimizing a module for a specific
> >application ends up removing all embedded assets from the module and
> >storing them in the application.
> >
> >If you want i can reproduce this in a few example projects and post it up
>
plication.
>
>If you want i can reproduce this in a few example projects and post it up
>on my git.
>
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 17:19:06 -0800
>> Subject: Re: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11
>>
>> I
a metatag to exclude a class (embedded asset) from
> >module optimization? so it would stay in the module while i optimize it
> >for the main app, and then only have to statically link the few bits and
> >pieces that are lacking in each.
> >
> >> From: aha...@ado
ts and
>pieces that are lacking in each.
>
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:51:44 -0800
>> Subject: Re: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11
>>
>> OK, so let me make sure I understand:
>>
>> For fir
stability (ie: new SDK) and
> >downloading a smaller amount of bytes than the 4.5.1 RSL's. a few bytes
> >are big money when you are distributing them to a million ppl.
> >
> >Unfortunately, that's the reality of the business side of a social app. :(
> >
>
;downloading a smaller amount of bytes than the 4.5.1 RSL's. a few bytes
>are big money when you are distributing them to a million ppl.
>
>Unfortunately, that's the reality of the business side of a social app. :(
>
>
>> From: david_coleman_...@hotmail.com
>> To: de
's. a few bytes are big money when you are
distributing them to a million ppl.
Unfortunately, that's the reality of the business side of a social app. :(
> From: david_coleman_...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11
>
logistical and political need as much as it is a technical
>decision to approach it this way.
>
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 14:43:33 -0800
>> Subject: Re: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11
>>
>>
>&
o: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 14:43:33 -0800
> Subject: Re: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11
>
>
>
> On 12/3/13 2:38 PM, "David Coleman" wrote:
>
> >Actually Alex, what is the biggest culprit in our file is Greensock, and
> >after that,
On 12/3/13 2:38 PM, "David Coleman" wrote:
>Actually Alex, what is the biggest culprit in our file is Greensock, and
>after that, a whole mess of engine logic needed to handle the interface
>with the games. Also some of our legacy animations use Tweener, so for
>now I'm cursed with having to i
On 12/3/13 2:31 PM, "David Coleman" wrote:
>The point is that WE have to host that extra file.
>
>Therefore I would want to eliminate the need for multiple RSL's and
>consolidate them into a single smaller optimized RSL with only the
>necessary classes needed for my app, with their dependencies
a benefit -
I'm ok with those numbers.
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 14:27:56 -0800
> Subject: Re: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11
>
> Apache Flex SDKs don't have signed RSLs that get separately cached by the
> Flash
user generating 5n 301 hits against our
CDN, where n==1+number of modules.
When you are talking about an app with 1.5-2M MAU the cost of 5n 301's is
considerable, and reducing that to n 301's is a significant benefit.
> Subject: Re: SharedLibrary not works with SD
ve maintained
>>the
>> > fastest load in our category on facebook for
>> > nearly a year now. :) I intend/need to keep it that way.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > so your short answer is "a very big, yet very,
Hi,
Perhaps I missing the point but you can use framework RSLs with Apache Flex,
however they will be cached by the users browser and may still be useful and
give some advantages for an application that is used frequently, has high usage
or with multiple application from the same domain. It's
our app into the future using Apache Flex. I don't
want to be locked into 4.5.1 for the next 6 or more years of our application's
projected life. That's the lazy way out.
> Subject: Re: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11
> From: harbs.li...@gmail.com
> Date: Tu
c. Once I have the tools, I'll make it happen, and
> we will migrate to Apache Flex. Our target
> Flash Player version is 10.3 for maximum penetration.
>
>
>
>
>
> If there is any glimmer of hope to accomplish this... tell me, and let me
> know how I can hel
gt; To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:20:07 -0800
> Subject: Re: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11
>
> Hi David,
>
> So you are saying that there is 566K in non-Flex code and assets to
> generate the first screen (after the preloader)? How much of that i
he tools, I'll make it happen, and
>we will migrate to Apache Flex. Our target
>Flash Player version is 10.3 for maximum penetration.
>
>
>
>
>
>If there is any glimmer of hope to accomplish this... tell me, and let
>me know how I can help.
>
>> From: aha..
sh Player version is 10.3 for maximum penetration.
If there is any glimmer of hope to accomplish this... tell me, and let me know
how I can help.
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:22:26 -0800
> Subject: Re: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.
On 12/2/13 10:13 AM, "David Coleman" wrote:
>Having not tried this solution myself, this is pure speculation... but
>couldn't local storage store this? set domain to be "*" and retrieve it
>from the public svn repo. if not present the RSL manager can load it up
>and in this way we can sign it
riginal Message-
From: David Coleman [mailto:david_coleman_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 1:14 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11
Having not tried this solution myself, this is pure speculation... but couldn't
local storage
application
level, storing them at least for your own set of applications under a base
domain...
RSL's are the only reason that I hesitate to migrate our Facebook app to
apache. it will kill our CDN.
> Subject: RE: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11
> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:53:1
On 12/2/2013 10:05 PM, FRANKLIN GARZON wrote:
I have some problemas with SDK4.11 about the sahred library, please see this
bug: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3674828 , ADOBE says is
not for this product. Who can help us? Thanks.
i *think* that's because you're mixing RSL acro
: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11
RSLs are not enabled for Apache Flex. There have been many discussions on the
topic. Basically, without Adobe's signatures, RSLs are more or less pointless.
On Dec 2, 2013, at 5:05 PM, FRANKLIN GARZON wrote:
> I h
RSLs are not enabled for Apache Flex. There have been many discussions on the
topic. Basically, without Adobe's signatures, RSLs are more or less pointless.
On Dec 2, 2013, at 5:05 PM, FRANKLIN GARZON wrote:
> I have some problemas with SDK4.11 about the sahred library, please see this
> bug: h
27 matches
Mail list logo
