Having not tried this solution myself, this is pure speculation... but couldn't local storage store this? set domain to be "*" and retrieve it from the public svn repo. if not present the RSL manager can load it up and in this way we can sign it with our own Cert and validate that cert independent of Adobe? Would this be workable?
I've used local storage only for single sites before... but wouldn't it be possible to massage local storage to store something "global", like rsls? Or in your case, Mark, you could maybe do something similar at the application level, storing them at least for your own set of applications under a base domain... RSL's are the only reason that I hesitate to migrate our Facebook app to apache. it will kill our CDN. > Subject: RE: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11 > Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:53:17 -0500 > From: mark.kessler....@usmc.mil > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Well they are not pointless if you host multiple applications from the same > servers, but definitely degraded capabilities not being able to have a > separate cache for them. > > -Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harbs [mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 10:11 AM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: SharedLibrary not works with SDK 4.11 > > RSLs are not enabled for Apache Flex. There have been many discussions on the > topic. Basically, without Adobe's signatures, RSLs are more or less pointless. > > On Dec 2, 2013, at 5:05 PM, FRANKLIN GARZON wrote: > > > I have some problemas with SDK4.11 about the sahred library, please see > > this bug: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3674828 , ADOBE > > says is not for this product. > > Who can help us? > > Thanks. > > > > > > Franklin Garzón > > > > *Lucha hasta alcanzar tus sueños* > > > > > > > > >
