On 22/01/2014 17:12, Alex Harui wrote:
On 1/22/14 7:49 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
At least as the default. No harm in also offering legacy version(s).
But more work if you are suggesting that the release manager has to
produce convenience binaries in both Java 6 and Java 7. The installer
pro
On 1/22/14 7:49 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>At least as the default. No harm in also offering legacy version(s).
But more work if you are suggesting that the release manager has to
produce convenience binaries in both Java 6 and Java 7. The installer
probably also has to change, and it is anot
At least as the default. No harm in also offering legacy version(s).
EdB
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> We should be setting an example and moving to something that isn't full of
> holes :-)
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 22/01/2014 15:37, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>> I'm ok with that, b
We should be setting an example and moving to something that isn't full
of holes :-)
Tom
On 22/01/2014 15:37, Alex Harui wrote:
I'm ok with that, but an alternate plan is just to have Jenkins run Java
6.
On 1/22/14 3:44 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>On 22/01/2014 09:52, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>> IF we need two separate builds for the binaries, I can set it up.
>> Either on thebuilds@a.o machine
>I think that would be best. Then at least we'll know if we broke
>something :-)
I'm ok with that, but a
On 22/01/2014 09:52, Erik de Bruin wrote:
IF we need two separate builds for the binaries, I can set it up.
Either on thebuilds@a.o machine
I think that would be best. Then at least we'll know if we broke
something :-)
Tom
One side note. You should be able to have different versions of Java
installed.
-Mark
. Januar 2014 00:17
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: RE : RE : Java 1.6
>
> Im still not clear with the impact of the built sdk on application and I
> maybe mis understood for FM but thought it was ok to use it but not to built
> it only.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
endet: Mittwoch, 22. Januar 2014 00:17
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE : RE : Java 1.6
Im still not clear with the impact of the built sdk on application and I maybe
mis understood for FM but thought it was ok to use it but not to built it only.
Thanks.
Envoyé depuis un mobile Sa
00:00)
A : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: RE : Java 1.6
Right, people using flexmojos, java on server side and so on with Java 6
will have to migrate all to get all the system in the same version of Java.
But it implies changes to flexmojos to get working with Java 7 (as Chris
said). Maybe people
Right, people using flexmojos, java on server side and so on with Java 6
will have to migrate all to get all the system in the same version of Java.
But it implies changes to flexmojos to get working with Java 7 (as Chris
said). Maybe people could opt for a gradual migration and start only with
fle
11 matches
Mail list logo
