On 7/22/13 6:16 AM, "Christian Kiefer"
wrote:
>Turning of cacheAsBitmap
>-> Scrolling got much slower (in the renderer there is nothing
>changing/animating)
>Am I right when I think all the fxg files are cached and using bitmap
>images won't have any advantage (at least when cachingAsBitmap)?
W
Turning of cacheAsBitmap
-> Scrolling got much slower (in the renderer there is nothing
changing/animating)
Am I right when I think all the fxg files are cached and using bitmap
images won't have any advantage (at least when cachingAsBitmap)?
Turning of usage of virtual layout
-> Can't see any
> >Turning of cacheAsBitmap can help? Really?
> CacheAsBitmap has some interesting performance implications. Sometimes it
> is better to use it and sometimes, it is better to not use it.
>
>
I suggested this to test if something is changing the display list in a way
that cacheAsBitmap has to repea
On 7/19/13 1:28 AM, "Christian Kiefer"
wrote:
>I will see if the profiler tells me something... and if
>fxg-optimisations will help... as they have unnecessary levels of
>neseted groups inside.
You can dig into the renderer in the debugger and see how many display
objects are inside of the fxg
I will see if the profiler tells me something... and if
fxg-optimisations will help... as they have unnecessary levels of
neseted groups inside.
And I will test if turning off virtualisation will help (as it is a
list with max. 24 renderers)... Thanks...
Turning of cacheAsBitmap can help? R
The profiler can help measure performance. Besides creation and
validation, another issue may be rendering. Look for [render] near the
top of the performance profile.
I recently discovered that fxg can be very non-optimal. There can be lots
of empty groups or unnecessary levels of groups and th
I would try creating a MXML based renderer, turn off virtualization on the
list and then compare the results. Virtualization allows reusing a renderer
but if you are seeing issues during scrolling then either creation or
validation is too heavy. When you turn off virtualization the row is only
crea
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Christian Kiefer <
christian.kie...@goal-games.de> wrote:
> Maybe someone can tell me what's wrong with my itemRenderer as all my
> other renderers performe quite good...
I've never created a renderer with quite so many images but I have some
with up to 6 (if my
About the itemRenderer-Performance-Issues...
I've written an itemRenderer based no IconItemRenderer with some texts
and a lot of (fxg) images... and the scrolling is horrible...
Maybe someone can tell me what's wrong with my itemRenderer as all my
other renderers performe quite good...
Code
ly 02, 2013 10:28 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org; jef...@dot-com-it.com
Cc: OmPrakash Muppirala
Subject: Re: Flex mobile performance
I have created one app for the mobile banking they want to see the graphs
and in the app I have used 6-7 types of graphs. It will take time to load
the graphs and also t
I have created one app for the mobile banking they want to see the graphs
and in the app I have used 6-7 types of graphs. It will take time to load
the graphs and also taking time in switching one graph to another if I want
to go back to previous graph it will load again.
I think the main problem
On 7/1/2013 1:15 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:43 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
So, when folks are saying that Flex does not perform well on mobile, can
you please post some examples, etc so we can try to figu
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:15 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Is there something we can do about this in terms of coding/compiler
> warnings etc. ? Or perhaps have a Flex PMD rule for this?
>
I think there are plenty of articles out there telling developers how to
get good performance and to wri
Another thing is,in flex there is no such thing to export vector pdf from
exact display with respective matrix and position..
On Jul 1, 2013 10:46 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jonathan Campos >wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:43 PM, OmPrakash Muppiral
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:43 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> wrote:
>
> > So, when folks are saying that Flex does not perform well on mobile, can
> > you please post some examples, etc so we can try to figure out what the
> > real problems? As
15 matches
Mail list logo
