Thanks Om!
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Om wrote:
> Tweet sent out [https://twitter.com/apacheflex]. Now, everyone go retweet
> it!
>
> BTW, thanks to Justin for doing such a fantastic job, again!
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Om wrote:
>
> > I have access to the Tw
Tweet sent out [https://twitter.com/apacheflex]. Now, everyone go retweet
it!
BTW, thanks to Justin for doing such a fantastic job, again!
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Om wrote:
> I have access to the Twitter account (the login details were sent to
> private@flex... a while ago
Tink said last March that all committers have access to the Twitter account.
I'm not sure what that means…
On Feb 28, 2013, at 3:16 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
>
> On 2/28/2013 8:07 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
>> Speaking of all this -- do you remember who runs our twitter and FB
>> account
I have access to the Twitter account (the login details were sent to
private@flex... a while ago)
I can send out a tweet when I am fully awake.
Thanks,
Om
On Feb 28, 2013 6:19 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> Actually, would you be willing to just post in there that 4.9.1 was
> released?
>
>
Actually, would you be willing to just post in there that 4.9.1 was
released?
-Nick
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
>
> On 2/28/2013 8:07 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
>
>> Speaking of all this -- do you remember who runs our twitter and FB
>> accounts? We should get
On 2/28/2013 8:07 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
Speaking of all this -- do you remember who runs our twitter and FB
accounts? We should get the announcement on there too.
I have admin rights to the FB account; and would be more than willing
to give any committer similar rights; but you
Speaking of all this -- do you remember who runs our twitter and FB
accounts? We should get the announcement on there too.
-Nick
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > As soon as the blog post is done, let me know and I will put that on the
> homepage as well.
> Do
were basically the same as the announcement
> so here you go:
>
> The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
> Flex 4.9.1!
>
> Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for
> building and maintaining expressive applications
+1 to sdk version selection.
...and download to subfolders named "apache-flex-sdk-".
On 02/28/2013 10:26 AM, Jagan Langa Sami Durai wrote:
Hi,
It will be nice to have a dropdown option to select the SDK version in the
SDK Installer.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
ating temporary directory
Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:
http://mirror.hosting90.cz/apache/flex/4.9.1/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.9.1-bin.zip
Unable to clean up temporary installation directories
Installation aborted
Verifying Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature
The Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature of the downl
Hi,
It will be nice to have a dropdown option to select the SDK version in the
SDK Installer.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> Everyone, please test both the badge and installer if you have the time.
>
> Tested on OSX en_AU locale - all good. (Although we still
e basically the same as the announcement
> so here you go:
>
> The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
> Flex 4.9.1!
>
> Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for
> building and maintaining expressive applications that
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex
4.9.1!
Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for
building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy consistently on
all major browsers, desktops and devices (including
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex
4.9.1!
Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for
building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy consistently on
all major browsers, desktops and devices (including
Hi,
> Thanks for all the hard work Justin! As soon as the blog post is done.
The last blog and the account were basically the same as the announcement so
here you go:
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex
4.9.1!
Apache Flex is a highly productive, o
Hi,
> As soon as the blog post is done, let me know and I will put that on the
> homepage as well.
Do we want to do that before we have the official announcement? I have it ready
to go.
> If you need help putting that together, I'm more than willing to help with
> that too.
I'll be able to get
Done.
Thanks for all the hard work Justin! As soon as the blog post is done, let
me know and I will put that on the homepage as well. If you need help
putting that together, I'm more than willing to help with that too.
-Nick
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > D
Hi,
>> Everyone, please test both the badge and installer if you have the time.
Tested on OSX en_AU locale - all good. (Although we still have the red
checkboxes).
Justin
Hi,
> Do you want me to touch all the other places on the website to include the
> new version number?
If you have the time yes please. I'm helping out a track at ApacheCon today and
my focus may be elsewhere.
Thanks,
Justin
Hii,
> One quick note -- the SDK installer doesn't really say which version of the
> SDK it is installing (if you already had it installed).
The version number is in the file name (which you can see when it's
downloading) and in the log but would be nice for it to be in big bold letters
up fro
Justin,
Do you want me to touch all the other places on the website to include the
new version number?
-Nick
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Will do it later tonight to account for mirror propagation.
> Much appreciated.
>
> > We should also add a blog post and
It is working for me...
One quick note -- the SDK installer doesn't really say which version of the
SDK it is installing (if you already had it installed). There wasn't
really any notification that it was a newer version than last time I ran
it...
-Nick
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Erik de
Om,
I checked and verified the entire installer tool chain. Nice work!
EdB
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Om wrote:
> The config has been updated. As has the installer badge here:
> http://flex.apache.org/installer.html
>
> Everyone, please test both the badge and installer if you have the
The config has been updated. As has the installer badge here:
http://flex.apache.org/installer.html
Everyone, please test both the badge and installer if you have the time.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Om wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> H
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Will do it later tonight to account for mirror propagation.
> Much appreciated.
>
>
I tested the change to the
http://flex.apache.org/sdk-installer-config-2.0.xml on my installed Apache
Flex SDK Installer 2.0.2. The change worked a
Hi.
>> I noticed that the 4.9.1 release does not have a tag. Do you plan to cut
>> it soon?
> Yes today. It's will be in the 4.9 release branch so you may not notice it.
Merged 4.9.1 into trunk and tagged - all done.
Justin
Hi,
> Will do it later tonight to account for mirror propagation.
Much appreciated.
> We should also add a blog post and a twitter announcement of the release.
Once we send the official announce email out yes.
Thanks,
Justin
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Do you plan on working on the tasks mentioned above?
> Leave the SVN tasks for me.
>
> > Or did you mean to ask for help?
> If you want to help out with the installer go ahead.
>
Will do it later tonight to account for mirror prop
Hi,
> I noticed that the 4.9.1 release does not have a tag. Do you plan to cut
> it soon?
Yes today. It's will be in the 4.9 release branch so you may not notice it.
Justin
Hi,
> Do you plan on working on the tasks mentioned above?
Leave the SVN tasks for me.
> Or did you mean to ask for help?
If you want to help out with the installer go ahead.
Justin
HI,
> Let me know if you want me to make the changes needed on the website.
I'v updated the download pages can you review?
Thanks,
Justin
I noticed that the 4.9.1 release does not have a tag. Do you plan to cut
it soon?
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache Flex 4.9.1 has been releases and the mirror are slowly taking it
> up. There still a few tasks to be completed.
>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Om,
>
> I've made the necessary additions/changes to make the command terminal
> work on a Mac. Note: in order to get Mustella to run, on OS X in a
> terminal that runs in the application space, you need to set the
> environment variables 'm
/display/FLEX/Updating+SDK+version+numbers+on+the+Website
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Justin Mclean > >wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Apache Flex 4.9.1 has been releases and the mirror are slowly taking it
>> &
the wiki page I posted here :
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Updating+SDK+version+numbers+on+the+Website
>
> -Nick
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Justin Mclean >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Apache Flex 4.9.1 has been releases and
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache Flex 4.9.1 has been releases and the mirror are slowly taking it
> up. There still a few tasks to be completed.
> 1. Update the installer config file to point to 4.9.1
> 2. Update web site links and info wi
On Feb 26, 2013 8:23 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Apache Flex 4.9.1 has been releases and the mirror are slowly taking it
up. There still a few tasks to be completed.
> 1. Update the installer config file to point to 4.9.1
> 2. Update web site links and i
Hi,
Apache Flex 4.9.1 has been releases and the mirror are slowly taking it up.
There still a few tasks to be completed.
1. Update the installer config file to point to 4.9.1
2. Update web site links and info with latest versions
3. Tag release in 4.9 branch.
4. Merges any changes fro the 4.9.1
Om,
I've made the necessary additions/changes to make the command terminal
work on a Mac. Note: in order to get Mustella to run, on OS X in a
terminal that runs in the application space, you need to set the
environment variables 'manually' (unless you want to hack deep in the
system config files).
+1 non-binding
Hi,
Current results:
3 +1 binding
1 +0 binding
1 -1 binding
1 +1 (non binding)
Does anything have any further objections or want to do more testing before I
officially make this a release?
Thanks,
Justin
+1 so far it seems really cool
On Feb 25, 2013 5:44 AM, "Om" wrote:
> I change my vote to +0 given that we agreed to fix the issue I raised in a
> future release.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/24/13 9:17 PM, "Om" wrote:
> >
> > >
I change my vote to +0 given that we agreed to fix the issue I raised in a
future release.
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/24/13 9:17 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
> > I was planning to run the Mustella tests overnight. Let me know if you
> have
> > enough votes
On 2/24/13 9:17 PM, "Om" wrote:
> I was planning to run the Mustella tests overnight. Let me know if you have
> enough votes dont need me to..
>
I think you are currently a -1. If we have enough +1's, do you still want
your -1 in the official record or do you want to withdraw it or change to
I was planning to run the Mustella tests overnight. Let me know if you have
enough votes dont need me to..
Om
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/24/13 2:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >> I am cool with that.
> >
> > Mind changing your vote? We don;t
On 2/24/13 2:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I am cool with that.
>
> Mind changing your vote? We don;t have enough +1 to release this yet and
> nothing to add to a RC4.
You should have yourself, Nick and me at +1.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe
Hi,
> Let me get home and do some more testing first? Maybe in another 12 hours.
More testing is always good.
Thanks,
Justin
Let me get home and do some more testing first? Maybe in another 12 hours.
Thanks,
Om
On Feb 24, 2013 2:36 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I am cool with that.
>
> Mind changing your vote? We don;t have enough +1 to release this yet and
> nothing to add to a RC4.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Hi,
> I am cool with that.
Mind changing your vote? We don;t have enough +1 to release this yet and
nothing to add to a RC4.
Thanks,
Justin
On Feb 23, 2013 4:53 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Sounds like a dubious reason to me. Writing a script to copy the sdk
to a
> > special directory and then building the release artifact would violate
this
> > rule?
> Well there's no way we going to make it match on windows and OSX.
>
Hi,
> Sounds like a dubious reason to me. Writing a script to copy the sdk to a
> special directory and then building the release artifact would violate this
> rule?
Well there's no way we going to make it match on windows and OSX.
Thinking about again I actually like the release managers name i
Sounds like a dubious reason to me. Writing a script to copy the sdk to a
special directory and then building the release artifact would violate this
rule?
This would be much easier than writing a tool to fix the paths after the
build process.
Om
On Feb 23, 2013 3:29 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
Mac users shouldn't have to work outside the user folder
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Om wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/22/13 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> >> What would it take to get the CI server to
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/22/13 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> >> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
> > We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may
> be
> > against policy to sign and re
Sorry Erik, for some reason I thought I replied to it.
Here is the path for Mustella:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/flex/sdk/branches/develop/mustella/utilities/OneClickMustella
Let me know how it goes.
Thanks,
Om
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> bump...
>
> EdB
>
>
bump...
EdB
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Om,
>
> Just checking: where is OnClickMustella? Is it the one in
> "sdk/branches/develop/mustella/utilities"?
>
> There are some 'subtle' differences between the Cygwin and "Mac"
> command lines, so you might need to make som
On 2/22/13 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> HI,
>
>> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
> We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may be
> against policy to sign and release them.
>
>> And what would its path look like?
> A little ugly a
HI,
> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may be
against policy to sign and release them.
> And what would its path look like?
A little ugly and Hudson would get the blame :-)
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\wor
On Feb 22, 2013 5:07 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> As far as I can see nothing was decided.
> This point release is not meant to solve all issues, see if this issue
can be resolved for 4.10?
>
> Justin
>
I am cool with that.
Thanks,
Om
Hi,
>> As far as I can see nothing was decided.
This point release is not meant to solve all issues, see if this issue can be
resolved for 4.10?
Justin
On 2/22/13 3:47 PM, "Om" wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> We decided that we will be using a more official directory path when
>>> cutting releases [1], [2]
>>
>> As far as I can see nothing was decided.
>>
>> Justin
>>
>
> What is your pro
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > We decided that we will be using a more official directory path when
> > cutting releases [1], [2]
>
> As far as I can see nothing was decided.
>
> Justin
>
What is your proposal going forward?
Om
Hi,
> We decided that we will be using a more official directory path when
> cutting releases [1], [2]
As far as I can see nothing was decided.
Justin
ri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Frédéric THOMAS >wrote:
>
> > oups !
> >
> >
> > -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS
> > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:21 AM
> > To: Alex Harui
> >
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
>
origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:21 AM
> To: Alex Harui
>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
>
> Do you think it is a bug in the tests or in the release source?
>>
>
> AFAIK, that's just tests, nothing relative to th
oups !
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:21 AM
To: Alex Harui
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Do you think it is a bug in the tests or in the release source?
AFAIK, that's just tests, nothing relative to the framework
it would mean we delay the release to next week, what do you
think guys ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:18 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Hi Alex,
I have a bit of time this morning to take
7;origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:01 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
On 2/20/13 8:20 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
It still happens besause of the headerStyleName of the DateChooser, I
guess
I should re-generate
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:01 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
On 2/20/13 8:20 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
It still happens besause of the headerStyleName of the DateChooser, I
guess
I should re-generate the image
On 2/20/13 8:20 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> It still happens besause of the headerStyleName of the DateChooser, I guess
> I should re-generate the images with that, what do you think ?
Hmm, I'm not sure how that happened. I guess I must have hit undo and some
point. I called the style "no
mberValidator_wrongLengthError, I send you a copy of the bas png.
I'll be away from today until Monday, I'll take my laptop but I'm not sure
I'll have internet there.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 3:32 AM
To: de
My mustella tests failed last night (issues with my flash player after an
update). I'm going to try and rerun it tonight.
On Feb 20, 2013 7:10 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding) from me also.
>
> Anyone else have some time to try this out?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
e:
> Hi,
>
> -1 at the moment as I still have failed tests and I can't solve them, Alex
> saied he's going to have a look, I sent him the images.
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Justin Mclean
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:
Hi,
-1 at the moment as I still have failed tests and I can't solve them, Alex
saied he's going to have a look, I sent him the images.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:09 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VO
Hi,
+1 (binding) from me also.
Anyone else have some time to try this out?
Thanks,
Justin
9 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
I have to turn off the computer for tonight, but I took a quick look.
For bubble, most of it looks like anti-aliasing differences, but I'm
surprised the font at the bottom is showing a different as well. I'll try
t
Om,
Just checking: where is OnClickMustella? Is it the one in
"sdk/branches/develop/mustella/utilities"?
There are some 'subtle' differences between the Cygwin and "Mac"
command lines, so you might need to make some UI changes to accomodate
these. I'll put in what I can/need to make it run and ha
your adobe email.
> Yes, I'm on the release4.9
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:04 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
>
> My tests did not fail on BubblePr
Just sent the attachements of the bubble and one of the
LangPacks/Japanese/tests on your adobe email.
Yes, I'm on the release4.9
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:04 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9
an" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
>
> There are only very minor changes from RC2 including updating the
> RELEASE_NOTES and REAMDE files, fixing the ASDocs logo and adding FLEX-29002
> (RTE fix for Popup
rédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:20 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
>
> Started...
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Justin Mclean
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:02 AM
> To: dev@flex.apach
y fix has
> been applied (but I can't do that tonight, I've got my tournament).
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Frédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:05 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex
-3 or -4 and when I check them with
ImageDiffAIR, there're no differences, what does it mean ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:20 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Started...
-Message d
with
ImageDiffAIR, there're no differences, what does it mean ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:20 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Started...
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin M
Hi,
> I'm going to try to do a run tonight.
Thanks.
Justin
Started...
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:02 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Hi,
I did find one Flex Unit issue in that it's missing some of the new
locales that the Apache Flex SDK now has
I'm going to try to do a run tonight.
On 2/18/13 8:29 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So far on OSX I've:
> 1. checked the md5 hashes and that the files are correctly signed - all good.
> 2. src compiles with an ant build.
> 3. run ant framework-rsls and ant other.locales.
> 4. Run makeAp
Hi,
it's a Flex Builder integrated Flex Unit issue not a Flex Unit issue as such.
Will see if I can find a way to fix it.
Justin
Hi,
>> I did find one Flex Unit issue in that it's missing some of the new locales
>> that the Apache Flex SDK now has, but that was the same for the 4.9.0
>> release.
> Are you talking about apache rb ? experimental rb or another one ?
Neither.
It's the Flex Unit that missing localisation. eg
I'll have time to mavenize it
and run it against my air project before I go in London (on thursday).
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 5:29 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Hi,
So far on OSX
Hi,
So far on OSX I've:
1. checked the md5 hashes and that the files are correctly signed - all good.
2. src compiles with an ant build.
3. run ant framework-rsls and ant other.locales.
4. Run makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder.sh to create an SDK that FB can use.
5. Set up a largish project to use thi
Hi,
This is a Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
There are only very minor changes from RC2 including updating the RELEASE_NOTES
and REAMDE files, fixing the ASDocs logo and adding FLEX-29002 (RTE fix for
PopupManager).
The release candidate can be found here
What would you think about an erratum mention instead of copying the mistake
?
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 8:06 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9.1
Hi,
The RELEASE_NOTES, in the Apache Flex 4.9.0 section indi
Hi,
> The RELEASE_NOTES, in the Apache Flex 4.9.0 section indicates FLEX-29002 as
> one of the fixed issue, that's not true, it might be only for the 4.9.1.
The initial 4.9 release note contained that, don't think we need to
retrospectively edit the old history part of the release notes.
Justi
Re: Apache Flex 4.9.1
Justin,
I finaly found it, it's the FLEX-29002.
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:53 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9.1
Hum... not sure that is this one, the patch from the FLEX-33231 shown
Justin,
I finaly found it, it's the FLEX-29002.
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:53 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9.1
Hum... not sure that is this one, the patch from the FLEX-33231 shown :
@@ -79
!= p && o.owner.accessibilityProperties)
{
o.owner.accessibilityProperties.silent = true;
}
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:36 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9.1
Hi,
I ran the tests with and it's ok
Al
Hi,
> I ran the tests with and it's ok
All good then.
> I guess that's the fix for FLEX-33379 but I wasn't able to determine who did
> it nor when.
It's this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33231
Looks to me like 33379 is a duplicate and can be closed.
Justin
I ran the tests with and it's ok, I guess that's the fix for FLEX-33379 but
I wasn't able to determine who did it nor when.
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 12:30 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9.1
Hi
Hi,
> Yes, Alex told I could include it in the 4.9.1 too, is this a problem ?
No as long as the tested like that.
> Btw, I took it from my develop branch and just seen it includes an other fix
> someone did which is not supposed to be in the 4.9.1
I'd prefer not to revert anything if no code ch
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
