OK, thanks.
I couldn't find licensing information on the crypto library, and was
halfway through hand-optimizing the md5 code we currently use when you
sent that link.
I've finished the hand-optimization and it now computes fast enough for me
to use an AS implementation and not worry about ANE or
Also, with Native Extensions, if you use a cross platform C++ framework
like Juce, then you can maintain the ANE much easier, just need a windows
and mac builders, but can use the same code for both.
-Sean Thayne
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Sean Thayne wrote:
> There is a crypto library t
There is a crypto library that is much faster than the built in adobe
stuff.
http://www.blooddy.by/en/crypto/
They don't include much for documentation, but it is very fast, and pretty
easy to get up and running.
-Sean Thayne
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski
wrote:
> I r
I run mustella directly from my IDE (IntelliJ). I don't have Cygwin
installed.
MinGW requires no setup. Just unzip a file and away you go.
-Nick
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Yes, but GCC on Windows requires MinGW right? Is that less onerous than
> Cygwin? In theory
Yes, but GCC on Windows requires MinGW right? Is that less onerous than
Cygwin? In theory we should already have Cygwin or some unix shell to run
Mustella.
-Alex
On 6/3/14 8:27 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>Alex,
>
>I use GCC to make my native extensions. GCC is available on both Mac an
Alex,
I use GCC to make my native extensions. GCC is available on both Mac and
Windows (and Linux) and is not a heavy requirement to compile. You don't
need Visual Studio to compile .DLLs on Windows.
http://quetwo.com/2011/10/31/creating-an-windows-air-native-extension-with-eclipse-part-1/
-Nic
As long as the procedure is properly (step by step actions) documented, I
don't think the requirement for Cygwin is all that bad, especially given
the UX improvement it will give to end users.
EdB
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:18 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, A
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, CrossBridge uses unix tools like gcc and swig. So removing the cygwin
> requirement will be painful.
>
> What is the current sentiment? Require Cygwin or Visual Studio? At least
> Cygwin is free. In theory other unix shells for Windows
OK, CrossBridge uses unix tools like gcc and swig. So removing the cygwin
requirement will be painful.
What is the current sentiment? Require Cygwin or Visual Studio? At least
Cygwin is free. In theory other unix shells for Windows will work but
CrossBridge doc onl mentions Cygwin.
Meanwhile,
Well, I'm new to Native Extensions as well, but it appears you can't
create a single extension that works on both OSX and Windows. Folks seem
to be using Visual Studio for Windows and Xcode for Mac. That seems like
a lot of work and a complicated build environment. The nice thing about
the Cross
In theory, all PMC members with Windows computers have Cygwin or some
shell script processor in place otherwise they cannot run Mustella.
We could create a separate release package like we did for PixelBender,
but seriously, how many of you are going to build the installer from
sources?
I'll look
> -1 for Cygwin too :-(
Something to note for Windows Users, if you install git bash (which is
generally part of the windows install for git) you can use it in place of
Cygwin. It might be a much easier way for us to move forward instead of
requiring Cygwin.
Mike
-1 for Cygwin too :-(
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juni 2014 21:00
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: [Installer] Using Alchemy/CrossBridge in the Installer
As you may have seen, I've added a bunch of MD5 checksums to the installe
13 matches
Mail list logo
