Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Mahmoud Ali
> > I found this link [1] for FlatSpark usage. Can we add this to the > RELEASE_NOTES? Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page? > > It would be nice to have a wiki page for the TLF Tables as well. Harbs, > any chance you can get something like that up? This version is outdated so it can caus

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I'd even consider taking the 'changing > the version' paragraph out entirely, as it seems that is an > exceedingly rare action. I'd leave it in.given that new versions of FP/AIR come out more frequently than we're currently releasing the SDK. I notice for instance that the build files are

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
> * Also, it's not clear whether "On Mac/Linux the AIR and Flash Player > version can be changed by running:" is optional or required. Should we > clarify that? I'd say that 'can be changed' should be enough indication that there is an original state/default... I'd even consider taking the 'changi

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
> BTW, the wiki page > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/AS3+Promises+-+a+guide+and+example > looks a incomplete. You might want to clean it up a bit. Yeah, I'll try to get to that next week... EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Mihai Chira
I just made a few changes to README, mostly cosmetic (see commit email). Some questions, while reading it: * "The Adobe Flash Player and Adobe AIR have excluded licenses so they can not be bundled with the Apache Flex SDK" - is that meant to be "exclusive"? * Also, it's not clear whether "On Mac/L

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
> RELEASE_NOTES? Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page? He stated he is working on an updated version for the Flex Wiki. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I have added a link to the wiki page for Promises. I found this link [1] for FlatSpark usage. Can we add this to the RELEASE_NOTES? Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page? It would be nice to have a wiki page for the TLF Tables as well. Harbs, any chance you can get something like that up?

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:52 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I have added a link to the wiki page for Promises. > BTW, the wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/AS3+Promises+-+a+guide+and+example looks a incomplete. You might want to clean it up a bit. Thanks, Om > > I

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
The README needs a bit about Java (1.)8 and the RELEASE_NOTES will be updated with any fixed JIRA tickets, but that's about it. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at them. Thanks, EdB On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE. I haven’t revi

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Alex Harui
I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE. I haven’t reviewed README/RELEASE_NOTES since they are still being worked on. I don’t know how to review CONTRIBUTORS, but I would imagine some of our new testers need to go in it. -Alex On 12/19/14, 1:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >So, the nice quiet on this t

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-19 Thread Erik de Bruin
So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the current state of the legal docs? EdB On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > >>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are >>concerned? > > It

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-11 Thread Alex Harui
On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are >concerned? It seems to be working for me. It could use more testing. It would be great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to build the source package. Sho

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-10 Thread Erik de Bruin
Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are concerned? EdB On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > The BlazeDS integration will affect all of these documents, so folks > should wait until it lands. > > -Alex > > On 12/10/14, 1:17 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wro

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-10 Thread Alex Harui
The BlazeDS integration will affect all of these documents, so folks should wait until it lands. -Alex On 12/10/14, 1:17 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >Thanks for reminding. I will take a look tomorrow. > >Thanks, >Om >On Dec 10, 2014 1:14 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > >> Bump... >> >> EdB

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-10 Thread Erik de Bruin
I'm trying to avoid 'last-minute' finds, and long discussions at a late stage that might block the release. Basically I'm starting early on calling on people to help out with the various tasks that have proved 'contentious' during previous releases :-) EdB On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Tom C

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-10 Thread Tom Chiverton
Oh, sorry, you just seemed really keen :-) Tom On 10/12/14 12:53, Erik de Bruin wrote: This is about the documentation. Especially these files: README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS. These are in their 'final' state, not likely to substantially change, whether we include the

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-10 Thread Erik de Bruin
This is about the documentation. Especially these files: README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS. These are in their 'final' state, not likely to substantially change, whether we include the TLF 'tables' contribution or not. Thanks, EdB On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Tom Chi

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-10 Thread Tom Chiverton
Given the flex-tlf unit tests are all failing on apacheflexbuild and have been for two weeks, I don't imagine there is much rush as I understand there is a bunch of TLF changes in the release ? Tom On 10/12/14 09:12, Erik de Bruin wrote: Bump... EdB On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik d

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-10 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Thanks for reminding. I will take a look tomorrow. Thanks, Om On Dec 10, 2014 1:14 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > Bump... > > EdB > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES, > > NOTICE, LICEN

Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-10 Thread Erik de Bruin
Bump... EdB On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Hi, > > I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES, > NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS) is in order BEFORE we enter the > release cycle. This will avoid discussion and delay, so please > contribute i

[LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation

2014-12-04 Thread Erik de Bruin
Hi, I want to make sure that the SDK documentation (README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE, LICENSE and CONTRIBUTORS) is in order BEFORE we enter the release cycle. This will avoid discussion and delay, so please contribute if you can! There were considerable changes to each of these documents, so please