I just made a few changes to README, mostly cosmetic (see commit email). Some questions, while reading it:
* "The Adobe Flash Player and Adobe AIR have excluded licenses so they can not be bundled with the Apache Flex SDK" - is that meant to be "exclusive"? * Also, it's not clear whether "On Mac/Linux the AIR and Flash Player version can be changed by running:" is optional or required. Should we clarify that? On 19 December 2014 at 21:16, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > The README needs a bit about Java (1.)8 and the RELEASE_NOTES will be > updated with any fixed JIRA tickets, but that's about it. I'd > appreciate it if you could take a look at them. > > Thanks, > > EdB > > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE. I haven’t reviewed README/RELEASE_NOTES >> since they are still being worked on. I don’t know how to review >> CONTRIBUTORS, but I would imagine some of our new testers need to go in it. >> >> -Alex >> >> On 12/19/14, 1:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >>>So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the >>>current state of the legal docs? >>> >>>EdB >>> >>> >>> >>>On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are >>>>>concerned? >>>> >>>> It seems to be working for me. It could use more testing. It would be >>>> great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to >>>>build >>>> the source package. >>>> >>>> Should we mention that we removed the need to download the one BlazeDS >>>>jar >>>> in the RELEASE_NOTES? >>>> >>>> I think I found a error in LICENSE. I think the MPL shouldn’t be in >>>> LICENSE. I could not find any MPL files in the source package (and >>>>there >>>> shouldn’t be because it is category B and only binaries can be MPL). >>>>So, >>>> I am about to pull that out unless someone can explain why it should >>>>still >>>> be in there. I kept thinking it had to do with OSMF, but OSMF isn’t in >>>> the source package either, and there is a sentence at the beginning >>>>saying >>>> it applies to most of the directories. In looking at Git/SVN history, my >>>> current thinking is that we added it for 4.8 when we had some >>>> to-be-donated Adobe source in the package, but now I think everything >>>>has >>>> been donated. >>>> >>>> Meanwhile, I’m working on putting the OFL license acceptance into the >>>> install scripts, but I have to stop for now. >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Ix Multimedia Software >>> >>>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>3521 VB Utrecht >>> >>>T. 06-51952295 >>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
