Re: [FlexJS} When to Bead (was Re: [FlexJS] enabled property)

2016-10-27 Thread Alex Harui
On 10/27/16, 9:09 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >I like the Yishayw concept os adding beads in CSS. Don't know about the >runtime cost of this, but it would allow users to configure if they want >this or those beads for their use. If you add in the

Re: [FlexJS} When to Bead (was Re: [FlexJS] enabled property)

2016-10-27 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex, I like the Yishayw concept os adding beads in CSS. Don't know about the runtime cost of this, but it would allow users to configure if they want this or those beads for their use. If you add in the component, all is done there and people can't change it. Maybe you're the person to decide

Re: [FlexJS} When to Bead (was Re: [FlexJS] enabled property)

2016-10-27 Thread Alex Harui
On 10/27/16, 12:48 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Thanks, > >I was not thinking this from that point of view. Maybe in MDL has sense to >include majority of beads since it's a concrete implementation of visuals: >Material Design Lite >But don't know if we could

Re: [FlexJS} When to Bead (was Re: [FlexJS] enabled property)

2016-10-27 Thread Alex Harui
On 10/27/16, 4:39 AM, "yishayw" wrote: >Regarding verboseness, maybe we could have a new css property such as >'additionalBeads' which IStrand implementers look for and create? > >That keeps mxml compact with PAYG and flexibility. Possible, but I'm not sure that is worth the instance initializ

Re: [FlexJS} When to Bead (was Re: [FlexJS] enabled property)

2016-10-27 Thread yishayw
yishayw wrote > how do you re-enable a bead should read yishayw wrote > how do you re-enable a strand -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-When-to-Bead-was-Re-FlexJS-enabled-property-tp56044p56073.html Sent from the Apach

Re: [FlexJS} When to Bead (was Re: [FlexJS] enabled property)

2016-10-27 Thread yishayw
Carlos, I had a look at Disable (I like the short name). 2 Questions: the swf side isn't implemented, is that by design? Also, how do you re-enable a bead that's been disabled? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-When-t

Re: [FlexJS} When to Bead (was Re: [FlexJS] enabled property)

2016-10-27 Thread yishayw
en-to-Bead-was-Re-FlexJS-enabled-property-tp56044p56070.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS} When to Bead (was Re: [FlexJS] enabled property)

2016-10-27 Thread Carlos Rovira
ableBead' and 'BlurBead'. Of course, baking it in in advance is > the > least verbose and could work for a non-basic component set. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-flex- > development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-When-to-Bead-was

Re: [FlexJS} When to Bead (was Re: [FlexJS] enabled property)

2016-10-26 Thread yishayw
bleBead' and 'BlurBead'. Of course, baking it in in advance is the least verbose and could work for a non-basic component set. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-When-to-Bead-was-Re-FlexJS-enabled-property-tp56044p56049.htm

[FlexJS} When to Bead (was Re: [FlexJS] enabled property)

2016-10-26 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Carlos, I just saw your tweet with the MDL example in front of the MXML for it. There seemed like a lot of MXML in the example. I was wondering if you considered baking in the Prompt and Disable beads into your example to make it less verbose. The reason the Basic components have TextPromptB