On 10/27/16, 4:39 AM, "yishayw" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Regarding verboseness, maybe we could have a new css property such as >'additionalBeads' which IStrand implementers look for and create? > >That keeps mxml compact with PAYG and flexibility. Possible, but I'm not sure that is worth the instance initialization cost at runtime. IMO, if you want to bake in a set of additional beads, that is when you subclass and add the beads. MXMLComponents lends itself to that pattern. -Alex
