Ah, I misunderstood which asdoc-config file.
On 6/30/17, 1:31 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>The asdoc target doesn't work because we've extended ActionScript for
>FlexJS. We only care about the ASDoc Example. I guess we should comment
>out the asdoc target for now. Also, it looks like the ASDoc ex
The asdoc target doesn't work because we've extended ActionScript for
FlexJS. We only care about the ASDoc Example. I guess we should comment
out the asdoc target for now. Also, it looks like the ASDoc example uses
its own asdic-config.xml file in its src/main/config folder.
-Alex
On 6/30/17,
I'm running the asdoc target in flex-asjs and it has rejected a couple of
things in Core/main/flex/Promise.as such as:
[asdoc]
/Users/pent/dev/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/flex/Promise.as(270):
col: 19 Error: Syntax error: expecting identifier before catch.
[asdoc]
[a
OK, I removed the Flex SDK ASDoc part of the build. Next build is
probably less than 2 hours away.
-Alex
On 3/15/17, 11:21 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Alex,
>
>I think we have enough agreed on switching it to FlexJS ASDoc. We have
>failing build on jenkins [1] for a long time,
Alex,
I think we have enough agreed on switching it to FlexJS ASDoc. We have
failing build on jenkins [1] for a long time, which means that none can try
the fresh changes through the installer.
[1] http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
+1 For switching, because everything is better than having a legacy dependency
on the old FDK.
+1 For adding a marker to implement something to produce static content as soon
as we have the time.
Chris
Am 10.03.17, 07:12 schrieb "Alex Harui" :
On 3/9/17, 9:45 PM, "piotrz" wrot
-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-was-Re-FlexJS-maven-faling-WeakMap-tp60325p60335.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 3/9/17, 9:45 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
> +1 for switching.
>
>I can spent some time to try make your ADoc visually similar to the old
>one.- But for sure it won't be fast. My reference will be
>http://flex.apache.org/asdoc/
>
>It can be nice excercises.
I suppose it won't ever be as f
ssage in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-was-Re-FlexJS-maven-faling-WeakMap-tp60325p60326.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
s ugly but somewhat
operational [1][2]. Should we switch to using it for now?
Thanks,
-Alex
[1] https://s.apache.org/FlexJSASDoc
[2] https://s.apache.org/FlexJSASDocJS
On 3/5/17, 8:10 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>How many folks actually use the FlexJS ASDoc?
>
>Do folks have
On 12/22/16, 12:28 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Ok ... yesterday I completely refactored the compiler to work without the
>SharedData.
Thanks for doing that.
>The only thing no longer working is the ASDoc generation.
>
>Right now it’s probably even related to ASDoc using a custom
>FlexJSASDo
Team will start doing Code Inspections. :D
>
>Thanks Chris!
>
>Looking forward to the results. :)
>
>Piotr
>
>
>
> -
>Apache Flex PMC
>piotrza
.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 12/14/16, 9:38 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Today I finally got enough of a FlexJS ASDoc app running to mention it on
>the list, in hope that other folks can pitch in to help us finish it and
>help prove that FlexJS can help folks do something useful, as we
>Thanks Chris!
>
>Looking forward to the results. :)
>
>Piotr
>
>
>
>-
>Apache Flex PMC
>piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reas
>on-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57489.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
>Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
t;[1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/
>
>Piotr
>
>
>
>-
>Apache Flex PMC
>piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDo
Hi Alex,
I’ll have a look at that ... would be great to resolve this as then I could
mark the maven plugin as threadsafe and we could speed up build times by
utilizing paralell builds.
Chris
Am 21.12.16, 16:28 schrieb "Alex Harui" :
On 12/21/16, 12:41 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrot
Hi Alex,
I simply removed the JS version of CSSTextField as this wasn’t referenced
anywhere and with that change I managed to proceed. I am still struggling with
a static bleed issue as the compiler state seems to be shared between the
differenct compiler types, but I think I’ll manage to fix t
his link [1] - It's HTML, so in theory if Chris produce HTML by maven I
>will probably able to see all tips for the methods.
>
>
>[1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/
>
>Piotr
>
>
>
>-
>Apache Flex PMC
>piotrzarzyck...@g
Chris produce HTML by maven I
will probably able to see all tips for the methods.
[1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/F
On 12/20/16, 10:48 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I’m currently workin on Maven support of the ASDoc output. Now I’m sort
>of wondering, why we need these „doc-namespaces“ and „doc-sources“ config
>options? Shouldn’t the normal sources and namespaces be enough?
Don't know for sure. I th
On 12/21/16, 12:41 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>Unfortunately the JSSharedData is byting me at the moment ... I’m having
>static stuff bleeding into one execution from another ... we should
>generally address that sooner than later ☹
In a quick look, JSSharedData appears to be used in place
On 12/21/16, 3:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>So far so good. The SWF xml outupt looks gread, even if I don’t know why
>classes, index and tags are Json files, but I’ll fix that later.
Basically, I did JSON output first, and was only half-way through the DITA
output when I put it down to de
rong understand it ?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reason-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57499.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ns. :D
Thanks Chris!
Looking forward to the results. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.2333
PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reason-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57489.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reason-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57489.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hint ? It
will be an html output ?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reason-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57487.html
Sen
-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ASDoc-Any-reason-for-additional-config-options-tp57486p57487.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I’m currently workin on Maven support of the ASDoc output. Now I’m sort of
wondering, why we need these „doc-namespaces“ and „doc-sources“ config options?
Shouldn’t the normal sources and namespaces be enough?
Chris
Hi,
> Is this true? The article Om posted seems to disagree.
While Google can index content from JS apps [4] they may not index all content
or may not give it equal weight / ranking to other static content. It’s
complicated, for instance see [1][2] (answered by a Google employee). And
exactly
On Dec 18, 2016 7:32 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>> So my line of thinking is: folks have limited time to contribute, so
>> spending that limited resource on static site generation of data is a
>>bit
>> contradictory.
>
>
>Don't we already generate HTML from asdocs? What more do you think we
>ne
>
>
>> So my line of thinking is: folks have limited time to contribute, so
>> spending that limited resource on static site generation of data is a
>>bit
>> contradictory.
>
>
>Don't we already generate HTML from asdocs? What more do you think we
>need
>to do on this. Other than maintenance? Ho
On 12/18/16, 5:27 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Google doesn’t index JS applications
Is this true? The article Om posted seems to disagree.
>I think HTML is best for that usecase.
>Displaying help in IDEs ususally works by looking for a file with the
>same name and relative path as the class
To add my oppinion to this topic:
I too think it’s a great idea to have some cool FlexJS tool to display our
documentation. No doubt about that.
But on the other side I think there are well established standards and there is
great benefit in supporting these too.
Google doesn’t index JS applica
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/16, 11:28 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/16/16, 7:05 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> >>Muppirala
On 12/16/16, 11:28 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
Muppirala" wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 12/16/16, 7:05 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>>Muppirala"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Dec 16, 2016 3:15 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>> >
>>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/16, 7:05 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >On Dec 16, 2016 3:15 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> >
> >Or could our framework dump out the resulting DOM and generate the static
> >HTML that way?
> >
>
On 12/16/16, 7:05 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Dec 16, 2016 3:15 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>Or could our framework dump out the resulting DOM and generate the static
>HTML that way?
>
>
>You are probably the only person who could build and maintain this :
On Dec 16, 2016 3:15 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
On 12/16/16, 3:06 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>I am surprised by the complexity of [1]. But because we have a tool
>chain, I wonder if the tool chain should somehow help. Should we have a
>tool that calls PhantomJS or some equivalent?
Or could our f
On 12/16/16, 3:06 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>I am surprised by the complexity of [1]. But because we have a tool
>chain, I wonder if the tool chain should somehow help. Should we have a
>tool that calls PhantomJS or some equivalent?
Or could our framework dump out the resulting DOM and generat
On 12/16/16, 1:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>
>IMO, this problem
>> needs to be made easy for all FlexJS applications and that's one reason
>>to
>> make ASDoc a RIA. So we can show folks how to do it. Are there really
>> static pages behind Home Depot and
che project. People should be able to contribute code and not need
someone else to have it properly documented.
>
>> Let's first discuss this one point: Should FlexJS ASDoc be static HTML
>>or
>> a Rich Internet Application?
>
>Why not both? One use case is will
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/16, 11:58 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/16/16, 11:42 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> >> Muppir
I have been
working on this project regularly for around 5 years so the risk is low. There
should also be other people who know some XSLT, it been around a while (1999+)
[2] and is well supported, for instance all modern browsers support XSLT.
> Let's first discuss this one point: Sho
On 12/16/16, 11:58 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
Muppirala" wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 12/16/16, 11:42 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>> Muppirala" wrote:
>>
>> >I think we don't need to decide one way or the other
If IDEs show docs on hover or in completion while you're coding, it's
usually from parsing the original ASDoc or some intermediate format (I
think SWCs can include that DITA format that Alex was talking about).
- Josh
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:58 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/16, 11:42 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >I think we don't need to decide one way or the other right now. We need
> >simple html docs for sure.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this. What
On 12/16/16, 11:42 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
Muppirala" wrote:
>I think we don't need to decide one way or the other right now. We need
>simple html docs for sure.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. What does "simple html" mean and why
do we need it?
-Alex
The Angular docs actually aren't static HTML. It looks like an Angular app!
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/function/angular.forEach
If you view source on the page above, you can see that there's a Loading...
placeholder and the real content is loaded dynamically.
- Josh
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016
I think we don't need to decide one way or the other right now. We need
simple html docs for sure. I think having the docs as an RIA as pretty
cool as well.
For example, AngularJS docs is available as mostly static content here:
https://docs.angularjs.org/api
For this kind of doc, we just need s
On 12/16/16, 1:51 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>What do I have to do to get the XML files? I’ll have a look at what I
>find.
In flex-falcon/compiler-jx there is a
org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.ASDOCJSC.java
It works just like MXMLC and COMPC. If you specify
-js-output-type=FLEXJS_DITA yo
s if you and Chris are
busy or no longer around?
Let's first discuss this one point: Should FlexJS ASDoc be static HTML or
a Rich Internet Application? Maybe there is some advantage to static HTML
that I don't understand. This is definitely not my area of expertise. I
just know th
Hi,
> I have the beginnings of a DITA emitter, but it needs finishing. You are
> welcome to finish it. IMO, the project is better off not having new
> dependencies on XSLT. It is great that you are an expert at it, but it is
> more important that we have redundancy in the community
I also know
I’m talking about using XSLT in the Maven plugin to convert the XML to HTML.
You don’t even need a dependency to anything, because XSLT is so standard, that
it’s part oft he JDK.
XML, XSL and HTML are everything but rocket-science ... you can do some crazy
stuff with XSL, but that’s not what I’
On 12/15/16, 3:02 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>If there now is a „asdoc.jar“ created by the ant build, the proper way to
>do this in Maven would be to create a „asdoc“ module. Creating multiple
>jars from one codebase is usually an indicator for the need to refactor.
Well, you are welcome to
On 12/15/16, 2:59 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>great to hear that ... being someone who still thinks the static API
>documentation is important, I would like to work on a maven site mojo to
>generate that static stuff. I am very experienced with XSLT, so that
>shouldn’t be a proble
If there now is a „asdoc.jar“ created by the ant build, the proper way to do
this in Maven would be to create a „asdoc“ module. Creating multiple jars from
one codebase is usually an indicator for the need to refactor.
Chris
Am 14.12.16, 19:10 schrieb "Alex Harui" :
On 12/14/16,
XML ... where is
that output to and what do I need to do to make him generate that?
Chris
Am 14.12.16, 18:38 schrieb "Alex Harui" :
Hi,
Today I finally got enough of a FlexJS ASDoc app running to mention it on
the list, in hope that other folks can pitch in to help us
which Jira
issues can be filed. It's nice to have simple code that demonstrates the
problem in a self-contained app, but a lot of people will find it easier to
just reference the docs app.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FLEXJS-ASDo
This is a great idea. Here are thr proper links (not broken by newlines)
[1] SWF version:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/FlexJS%20ASDoc%20Example/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/examples/flexjs/ASDoc/bin-debug/ASDoc.html
[2] JS version:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job
On 12/14/16, 10:00 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
Rovira" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>great work! :)
>
>I updated the pom.xml and uploaded, but doesn't has any content yet at the
>momento (but compilation is working in js) :)
Yeah, the simple part of adding the pom to compile the sou
Hi Alex,
great work! :)
I updated the pom.xml and uploaded, but doesn't has any content yet at the
momento (but compilation is working in js) :)
2016-12-14 18:38 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> Hi,
>
> Today I finally got enough of a FlexJS ASDoc app running to mention it on
> the l
Hi,
Today I finally got enough of a FlexJS ASDoc app running to mention it on
the list, in hope that other folks can pitch in to help us finish it and
help prove that FlexJS can help folks do something useful, as well as make
it easier for folks to write code with FlexJS.
Normally, our ASDoc is
n app. One thing
> >they mentioned is that they found it confusing that top level classes like
> >String, Array, etc. were not in the FlexJS asdoc, but others like QName
> >and
> >Namespace were.
> >
> >Now, I understand that we have custom implementations of Namesp
d an app. One thing
>they mentioned is that they found it confusing that top level classes like
>String, Array, etc. were not in the FlexJS asdoc, but others like QName
>and
>Namespace were.
>
>Now, I understand that we have custom implementations of Namespace and
>QName because t
I was talking to someone who is using FlexJS to build an app. One thing
they mentioned is that they found it confusing that top level classes like
String, Array, etc. were not in the FlexJS asdoc, but others like QName and
Namespace were.
Now, I understand that we have custom implementations of
On 8/2/16, 12:02 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>I don't think we should make ASDocs an application. If we would, Google
>could no longer index the online resources. Currently if I need info on
>an API I search in google and it usually directs me to an Adobe page
>where I can read i
_
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Montag, 1. August 2016 20:29:09
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [FlexJS] ASDoc?
I think there are past discussions about ASDoc and Falcon in the archives.
I think FalconJX does keep the asdoc around in the AST nodes. I think
ormat described anywhere? I'd like to write an antlr4 grammar from that.
>
>Chris
>
>
>
>Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
>
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
>Von: Josh Tynjala
>Datum: 01.08.16 17:03 (GMT+01:00)
>An: dev@flex.apache.o
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Josh Tynjala
Datum: 01.08.16 17:03 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [FlexJS] ASDoc?
I think Adobe still uses the older asdoc in their AIR SDK with ASC 2.0 too.
- Josh
On Aug 1, 2016 7:52 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
&g
I think Adobe still uses the older asdoc in their AIR SDK with ASC 2.0 too.
- Josh
On Aug 1, 2016 7:52 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
> On 8/1/16, 7:42 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
> >S ... any ideas/suggestions/whatever? Hope I didn't stumble over a
> >"TODO: This feature has to be impleme
cratch.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Montag, 1. August 2016 16:42:47
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [FlexJS] ASDoc?
Oh gee ... I can confirm it not no work ;-)
I had a look at ant and was surprised to see it using the antTasks from the
normal FDK. I used the asdoc-template.xml fo
On 8/1/16, 7:42 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>S ... any ideas/suggestions/whatever? Hope I didn't stumble over a
>"TODO: This feature has to be implemented" :-(
I got lost reading your email. ASDoc generation works from the flex-sdk
for generating ASDoc for flex-asjs. It is ASDoc, not Ja
e());
S ... any ideas/suggestions/whatever? Hope I didn't stumble over a "TODO:
This feature has to be implemented" :-(
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Montag, 1. August 2016 16:09:11
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] ASDoc?
On 8/1/16, 5:57 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>as I have just added the JavaDoc generation to the Java side of the
>build, now I thought ... hey, how about adding ASDoc too. But
>unfortunately I don't recall the latest state of that. Does ASDoc in
>Falcon work?
ASDoc from Falcon has ne
d auto-use them.
So I'll just try and run it and have a look at what explodes :-)
Chris
Von: Harbs
Gesendet: Montag, 1. August 2016 15:18:03
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] ASDoc?
Peter said in May that it builds. I never really tried to
Peter said in May that it builds. I never really tried to get it to build
myself.
Having the docs built and pushed out automatically would be great though.
Having a special build from the nightly would be cool too.
On Aug 1, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> as I have jus
Hi,
as I have just added the JavaDoc generation to the Java side of the build, now
I thought ... hey, how about adding ASDoc too. But unfortunately I don't recall
the latest state of that. Does ASDoc in Falcon work?
Chris
r Ent
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2016 20:47:12
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FlexJS]ASDoc
Harbs - Just saw your commit. That's one way to do it! I was just going
through the files, one by one to see the ramifications of changing them
back. Beat me to it.
Thanks,
Peter
On 5/10/1
Harbs - Just saw your commit. That's one way to do it! I was just going
through the files, one by one to see the ramifications of changing them
back. Beat me to it.
Thanks,
Peter
On 5/10/16, 2:38 PM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>No, it is not, once I grabbed his stuff. I'm looking at something else,
>bu
I just fixed it.
On May 10, 2016, at 9:38 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
> No, it is not, once I grabbed his stuff. I'm looking at something else,
> but I will see if I can determine what's going on.
> —peter
>
> On 5/10/16, 1:46 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> I have not been able to get the asjs repo to buil
No, it is not, once I grabbed his stuff. I'm looking at something else,
but I will see if I can determine what's going on.
—peter
On 5/10/16, 1:46 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I have not been able to get the asjs repo to build at all since Chris’
>last commit. Is it working for you?
>
>On May 10, 2016, a
I have not been able to get the asjs repo to build at all since Chris’ last
commit. Is it working for you?
On May 10, 2016, at 8:20 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Found a couple of issues and repaired them; the asdoc builds cleanly for
> me now.
> —peter
>
> On 5/10/16, 10:48 AM, "Peter Ent"
Hi,
Found a couple of issues and repaired them; the asdoc builds cleanly for
me now.
—peter
On 5/10/16, 10:48 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'll take a look at this and see what I can find.
>‹peter
>
>On 5/10/16, 9:51 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>>Oh.
>>
>>Does the link work for you? I just get two
Hi,
I'll take a look at this and see what I can find.
‹peter
On 5/10/16, 9:51 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Oh.
>
>Does the link work for you? I just get two blank frames.
>
>Should the ASDocs be built locally when I build the SDK?
>
>On May 10, 2016, at 4:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Docs are posted h
Oh.
Does the link work for you? I just get two blank frames.
Should the ASDocs be built locally when I build the SDK?
On May 10, 2016, at 4:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Docs are posted here [1]
>
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/NightlyFlexJSASDoc
> [1]
> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/j
Docs are posted here [1]
[1] http://s.apache.org/NightlyFlexJSASDoc
[1]
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/
artifact/out/asdoc/index.html
On 5/10/16, 4:28 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>What is the status of ASDoc for FlexJS? I haven’t seen docs anywhere. Is
>
What is the status of ASDoc for FlexJS? I haven’t seen docs anywhere. Is it
because there’s an issue generating docs or something else?
Harbs
I heard it is a painful to post the ASDoc via our CMS so I am choosing to
not spend time doing it. Volunteers are welcome to do it though.
-Alex
On 12/14/15, 3:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Any way you could publish the current release versions well that may be
>of more use to users an
Hi,
Any way you could publish the current release versions well that may be of more
use to users and potentially cause less confusion?
Thanks,
Justin
Good catch. I'll find a way to change it.
On 12/14/15, 3:11 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>It says "Apache Flex 4.15.0 API Reference". We should probably fix that?
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> I think I got the bui
It says "Apache Flex 4.15.0 API Reference". We should probably fix that?
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I think I got the build machine to build the ASDoc for FlexJS. You can
> access it here [1]
> Of course, it may evolve to be a bit newer than what is releas
I think I got the build machine to build the ASDoc for FlexJS. You can
access it here [1]
Of course, it may evolve to be a bit newer than what is released, but that
will give us incentive to release more often.
And of course, patches are welcome if you find errors.
-Alex
[1] http://s.apache.org/
On 5/14/15, 12:27 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>As you probably know, the asdoc build file is messed up since you did that
>big refactor I guess.
Oh, sorry. I generally don’t look at ASDoc until we get closer to
release. Thanks for working on it.
>
>If I can get that fixed, this could be my
As you probably know, the asdoc build file is messed up since you did that
big refactor I guess.
I fixed it up to include everything in the new directory format but, there
is one error in the HTML project that I have no idea how to fix, for now I
commented that doc-sources out and I have the whole
Hi,
We've updated the ASDOC for FlexJS with descriptions and all that good stuff.
I've posted it on my public Apache.org site:
http://people.apache.org/~pent/asdoc-flexjs/index.html
If you find anything confusing or in error, please feel free to submit patches
or corrections and we'll get the
Hi,
A copy is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~pent/asdoc-flexjs/index.html
However, there isn't much in the way of actual documentation. This is
being worked on.
Peter Ent
On 1/28/14 12:13 PM, "Mark Shen" wrote:
>what is the url to access the asdoc? do you have a public url?
>
>
>O
what is the url to access the asdoc? do you have a public url?
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've checked in changes to the build script for FlexJS that enables asdoc.
> You'll find the asdoc-output directory at the top, flex-asjs, level.
>
> There is a dearth of c
Hi,
I've checked in changes to the build script for FlexJS that enables asdoc.
You'll find the asdoc-output directory at the top, flex-asjs, level.
There is a dearth of content at the moment. My apologies for the lack of
comments; I will make sure I start properly documenting classes and functi
99 matches
Mail list logo
