Renaming this thread to get more attention as well. The Ant build is trying to generate ASDoc and failing because it uses the Flex SDK compiler to generate ASDoc and it can't handle the new compiler features we've added to Falcon.
So again, see my questions below. The ASDoc example is ugly but somewhat operational [1][2]. Should we switch to using it for now? Thanks, -Alex [1] https://s.apache.org/FlexJSASDoc [2] https://s.apache.org/FlexJSASDocJS On 3/5/17, 8:10 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >How many folks actually use the FlexJS ASDoc? > >Do folks have the cycles to make the ASDoc example a bit better? The dual >branch is pretty much going to force us to give up on using regular Flex >to generate our ASDoc. It might be time to just switch to the ASDoc >example until Chris or others get the DITA-to-HTML conversion working. At >least more of us know how to change MXML and AS in the example than change >the compiler or tweak the XSLT for DITA. And it would be eating our own >dog food. > >Thoughts? >-Alex
