AW: AW: AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions

2016-02-04 Thread Christofer Dutz
endet: Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2016 21:00 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions Chris, Any chance we can get this done soon? I'd like to start pulling jburg from Maven. Thanks, -Alex On 11/22/15, 8:10 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Unfortunately I re

Re: AW: AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions

2016-02-04 Thread Alex Harui
m] >Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. November 2015 15:49 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions > >Thanks Chris. I'll switch over to the Maven Jburg when you let us know >it is ready. > >-Alex > >On 11/22/15, 3:33 AM, "Christofer Dutz

AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions

2015-11-23 Thread Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Montag, 23. November 2015 11:59 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: RE: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions Security wise, I think we should be allowing the latest Java's to be used. -Mark

RE: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions

2015-11-23 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
Security wise, I think we should be allowing the latest Java's to be used. -Mark

AW: AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions

2015-11-22 Thread Christofer Dutz
work once. Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. November 2015 15:49 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions Thanks Chris. I'll switch over to the Maven Jburg when you let us know it is ready

Re: AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions

2015-11-22 Thread Alex Harui
tag, 22. November 2015 06:15 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions > >Yeah, it complained about 52. I'm running 51. No need to go all the way >back to 1.6 since I think it is fair to require 1.7 to compile Falcon, >but up to you. > >-Alex > &g

AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions

2015-11-22 Thread Christofer Dutz
Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. November 2015 06:15 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions Yeah, it complained about 52. I'm running 51. No need to go all the way back to 1.6 since I think it

Re: AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions

2015-11-21 Thread Alex Harui
rui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >Gesendet: Freitag, 20. November 2015 19:35 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: [FALCONJX] Java Versions > >For compatibility with FB, we tell the Java compiler to compile Falcon >with for Java 1.6 compatibility. > >Meanwhile, the various jars us

AW: [FALCONJX] Java Versions

2015-11-21 Thread Christofer Dutz
prüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 20. November 2015 19:35 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: [FALCONJX] Java Versions For compatibility with FB, we tell the Java compiler to compile Falcon with for Java 1.6 compatibility. Meanwhile, the various ja

[FALCONJX] Java Versions

2015-11-20 Thread Alex Harui
For compatibility with FB, we tell the Java compiler to compile Falcon with for Java 1.6 compatibility. Meanwhile, the various jars used by Falcon seem to be ok with using Java 1.7 to build Falcon to emit that 1.6-compatible output. Until now. I just tried switching from the Jburg jar on SourceF