FWIW, donations of existing code bases may require a separate form and ip
clearance process. I'll help you through it if needed.
On 7/9/14 10:13 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Send it to 'secret...@apache.org'. Once the form is processed, the PMC
>will
>get notice and your donations can start.
>
>
Send it to 'secret...@apache.org'. Once the form is processed, the PMC will
get notice and your donations can start.
EdB
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:37 PM, jude wrote:
> What do I do once I sign this? There are a few projects I'd like to donate
> besides signing off on TLF work.
>
>
> On Fri, J
What do I do once I sign this? There are a few projects I'd like to donate
besides signing off on TLF work.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Just to be sure (and get the legal stuff completely out of the way):
>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
>
> Thanks for your
> You can join your names together on the site.
I didn't find the way, can you tell me ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> Subject: Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2014 Report
> From: jus...@classsoftware.com
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 23:54:55 +0100
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> H
Just to be sure (and get the legal stuff completely out of the way):
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
Thanks for your contributions up till now and in the future!
EdB
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:33 AM, jude wrote:
> Harbs owns the code I commit on this project but if it will speed thi
Hi
> IMO, there is no real need to do this in the open.
+1 to doing it in the open - extra eyes on the checkins can't hurt.
Justin
Harbs owns the code I commit on this project but if it will speed things
along then by all means send me the ICLA.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> IMO, there is no real need to do this in the open. It was just a hope of
> mine that it would be done in the open...
>
The way
Okie Dokie.
I made the repository public: https://github.com/Harbs/TLF-Table-Work
And I added commit email notifications.
Hope it’s useful…
On Jun 6, 2014, at 2:00 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
>> If adding an email hook or opening the Githu
Hmm, ok, I'll go with seven. In my head I had an eighth person.
Thanks for catching that,
-Alex
On 6/5/14 3:57 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>>
>> -Eight committers gave presentations on Flex at the 360|Flex conference.
>>
>
>I count only 7 here [1] Are you sure your count is correct?
>
>T
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Harbs wrote:
> If adding an email hook or opening the Github repository will help, I’m
> fine with doing that.
>
>
That will definitely be useful in considering Jude for committership, which
is what I am looking forward to as well. It should be straightforward to
>
> -Eight committers gave presentations on Flex at the 360|Flex conference.
>
I count only 7 here [1] Are you sure your count is correct?
Thanks,
Om
[1] http://www.360flex.com/#speakers
If adding an email hook or opening the Github repository will help, I’m fine
with doing that.
But, yeah I gotta do as much hunkerin' down as I can… ;-)
On Jun 6, 2014, at 1:37 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/5/14 3:29 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> I¹m actually paying Jude to work on this, so it
Hi,
> -Frédéric Thomas
> -Frédéric THMOAS
> -fthomas
You can join your names together on the site.
> And they mention only JAVA and XML, not actionscript where I did some work
> too.
They guestimate but it better than no stats.
Justin
Hi,
> Hmm. It felt like we saw more activity like Fred on FDB, Chris on Maven
> and contributions from Nick and MikeL. I'm tempted to leave it in.
Up to you.
> Are you suggestion that we not say this in the report?
Leave it in - that fin by me.
Justin
On 6/5/14 3:29 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I¹m actually paying Jude to work on this, so it¹s probably not necessary
>for him to sign anything.
OK, if you have documentation that you own his work, then yes, no other
paperwork is required.
>
>I¹m very concerned about time and overhead invested in this (
I’m actually paying Jude to work on this, so it’s probably not necessary for
him to sign anything.
I’m very concerned about time and overhead invested in this (I’m on a really
tight schedule), so of the three options that Om mentioned, adding the email
hook is the only one I can see working.
P
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I know that requiring Jude to use patches will slow things down, but right
> now his work isn't happening at Apache so it isn't clear we can/should use
> that in considering committership for him, and also, all of his work is
> not granted to Ap
I know that requiring Jude to use patches will slow things down, but right
now his work isn't happening at Apache so it isn't clear we can/should use
that in considering committership for him, and also, all of his work is
not granted to Apache so really, you can't land your changes back in the
Apac
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Harbs wrote:
> Well, I’m open to suggestions. I could invite other folks to the
> repository to see what we’re doing. I could also make it public. I could
> also port the code over to the main Apache git repository.
>
> I’m kind of hesitant to do the last option ri
Well, I’m open to suggestions. I could invite other folks to the repository to
see what we’re doing. I could also make it public. I could also port the code
over to the main Apache git repository.
I’m kind of hesitant to do the last option right now, because I can’t really
afford the time it wo
IMO, it would have been better to have Jude work via JIRA for a bit so we
could see his work and collaboration in the open which would have probably
resulted in him being voted in as a committer.
And, of course, it isn't too late to start doing that.
-Alex
On 6/5/14 2:02 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>BT
BTW, “very active” is 59 commits since March 26. (I was working on it myself
before that.)
On Jun 5, 2014, at 11:58 PM, Harbs wrote:
> FWIW, Jude and I have both been very active on the TLF table support.
>
> We’ve been working on a private Github repository because Jude is not a
> committer
FWIW, Jude and I have both been very active on the TLF table support.
We’ve been working on a private Github repository because Jude is not a
committer and things are still quite unstable.
Current status is as follows:
* Tables render with cell strokes and backgrounds
* Selections of cell conten
@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2014 Report
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:35:18 +
>
>
>
> On 6/5/14 5:00 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >> In the past three months we've continued to see:
> >> - Cont
On 6/5/14 5:00 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> In the past three months we've continued to see:
>> - Continued JIRA activity (more bugs raised than resolved however)
>Yep - we need more user and committers active here in helping to fix bugs.
>
>> - More committers becoming active again.
>L
Hi,
> In the past three months we've continued to see:
> - Continued JIRA activity (more bugs raised than resolved however)
Yep - we need more user and committers active here in helping to fix bugs.
> - More committers becoming active again.
Looks steady to me:
http://www.ohloh.net/p/ApacheFlex/c
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/4/14 12:19 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks. I'm going to be checking in a newer MD5 algorithm and cutting
> >>an
> >> Installer RC soon so we can get more infor
On 6/4/14 12:19 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Thanks. I'm going to be checking in a newer MD5 algorithm and cutting
>>an
>> Installer RC soon so we can get more information on the failures.
>>
>
>Cool. And I do see the "info" param
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Thanks. I'm going to be checking in a newer MD5 algorithm and cutting an
> Installer RC soon so we can get more information on the failures.
>
Cool. And I do see the "info" param with the stack trace information in
some of the calls.
>
> W
Thanks. I'm going to be checking in a newer MD5 algorithm and cutting an
Installer RC soon so we can get more information on the failures.
We also usually report web-site hits per-day. Do you have a figure for
that?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 6/4/14 11:33 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>Numbers as o
Numbers as of 2 minutes ago:
Flex 4.12.0 - 7933 installs
Flex 4.12.1 - 4557 installs
FlexJS 0.0.1 - 321 installs
(Total failures, btw, are still high - 2942 failures in all categories)
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Time to file a report again. Can someone s
Time to file a report again. Can someone supply usage and installer stats?
Other feedback and comments welcome.
Thanks,
-Alex
-
Apache Flex is an application framework for easily building Flash-based
applications for mobile devices, the browser and desktop.
RELEASES
-Apache Flex S
32 matches
Mail list logo
