Well, I’m open to suggestions. I could invite other folks to the repository to see what we’re doing. I could also make it public. I could also port the code over to the main Apache git repository.
I’m kind of hesitant to do the last option right now, because I can’t really afford the time it would take me to do that right now… It’s going to be quite a bit of work merging the code back. On Jun 6, 2014, at 12:19 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > IMO, it would have been better to have Jude work via JIRA for a bit so we > could see his work and collaboration in the open which would have probably > resulted in him being voted in as a committer. > > And, of course, it isn't too late to start doing that. > > -Alex > > On 6/5/14 2:02 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> BTW, ³very active² is 59 commits since March 26. (I was working on it >> myself before that.) >> >> On Jun 5, 2014, at 11:58 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> FWIW, Jude and I have both been very active on the TLF table support. >>> >>> We¹ve been working on a private Github repository because Jude is not a >>> committer and things are still quite unstable. >>> >>> Current status is as follows: >>> * Tables render with cell strokes and backgrounds >>> * Selections of cell content and cell ranges work. >>> * Editing of cell content and surrounding text works >>> * Tables recompose as needed when cell content changes. >>> >>> We¹ve radically changed the way table and sub elements are handled. >>> * Columns and rows are not normal children. They are informational only. >>> * Content within cells belong to a separate TextFlow. >>> * We¹ve introduced the concept of nested TextFlows and >>> SelectionManagers/EditManagers which are nested within each other. >>> Control is passed between parent and child SelectionManagers as needed. >>> * We¹ve introduced table blocks used for composition in a similar >>> manner to how TextFlowLines are used. >>> * The logic used for composition and selection is much more >>> understandable than what was originally written. >>> >>> Work still needed: >>> * Lots of little rendering issues need to be resolved. >>> * Some normalization logic still needs to be implemented. >>> * Cell range selection needs to be improved. >>> * Text selection which spans tables needs work. >>> * Table editing operations still need to be done. >>> * Work still needs to be done relating to header and footer cells >>> * There¹s probably bugs related to cells which span rows/columns. >>> * Lots of tests need to be created. >>> * Markup import needs work. >>> >>> That¹s about it. >>> >>> I¹m guessing it¹ll be in shape where we can think about merging it back >>> into the develop branch in a couple of weeks. >>> >>> Harbs >>> >>> On Jun 5, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/5/14 5:00 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>>> In the past three months we've continued to see: >>>>>> - Continued JIRA activity (more bugs raised than resolved however) >>>>> Yep - we need more user and committers active here in helping to fix >>>>> bugs. >>>>> >>>>>> - More committers becoming active again. >>>>> Looks steady to me: >>>>> http://www.ohloh.net/p/ApacheFlex/contributors/summary >>>> Hmm. It felt like we saw more activity like Fred on FDB, Chris on >>>> Maven >>>> and contributions from Nick and MikeL. I'm tempted to leave it in. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> - Fewer new folks contributing and eventually becoming committers. >>>>> IMO (from mail list sign ups and installs that we have increased user >>>>> activity but we don't seem to be good at encouraging them to >>>>> contribute >>>>> more than JIRA reports. There's been a few exceptions ie we've just >>>>> had >>>>> some help with the Android skins. >>>> Are you suggestion that we not say this in the report? >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> >>> >> >
