Justin,
This discussion is about the particular change that is explained in the
vote. Any discussion about other changes should be in another thread, so we
don't cloud the issue at hand and needlessly drag out this discussion.
Both sides gave laid out their arguments. It is now time to vote.
EdB
Hi,
>> This message [1] from you appears to say that the default is consensus.
Because it is what is specified on most non release votes we have taken ie
appointing committers or PMC members. A couple of votes were specified
differently eg voting in the guidelines (2/3rds Majority Approval) and
On 11/26/2014 04:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 11/26/14, 12:37 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
Hi,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Guidelines says the
default is "consensus"
It's not the default as such but more a safety net to what is used if the
type of vote isn't specified i
On 11/26/14, 12:37 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Guidelines says the
>>default is "consensus"
>
>It's not the default as such but more a safety net to what is used if the
>type of vote isn't specified in the VOTE email or covered by any of t
Hi,
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Guidelines says the default
> is "consensus"
It's not the default as such but more a safety net to what is used if the type
of vote isn't specified in the VOTE email or covered by any of the other
guidelines (ie very rarely). It's only be
... and we're already 4 emails in a thread that shouldn't even exist :-(
For the people (especially PMCs) not keeping up with the other
conversations currently going on, I'll summarize (summarise?) what
prompted this VOTE:
Bertrand Delacretaz, one of our former mentors and a Apache Board
member,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> "As per Apache best practices and Bertrand's suggestion, I propose we
> change the following line in our bylaws [...]"...
IIUC this is based on my remark in another thread that
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html specifies that -1 o
"As per Apache best practices and Bertrand's suggestion, I propose we
change the following line in our bylaws [...]"
What is unclear about that?
EdB
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
>> I think the introduction in the VOTE
>> clearly states my reason for calling it.
>
>
I think the introduction in the VOTE
clearly states my reason for calling it.
I just reread your vote request and do not understand, nor see any
reason for the change.
I am left unsure what the issue is that brought this topic up; or what
the implications are of the change are.
Can yo
I intentionally didn't start a DISCUSS, given the whole discussion
about long discussions ... I think the introduction in the VOTE
clearly states my reason for calling it.
EdB
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is customary to call for a discussion before votin
Hi,
It is customary to call for a discussion before voting.
Can I ask what you are trying at achieve here? This would only effect VOTES
where the voting method is not specified, and that's quite rare. Off the top of
my head I think it's only happened once in this project (and that was an
acci
11 matches
Mail list logo
