I'm currently working on using Falcon in Flexmojos for compiling normal
applications ... so this assumption is valid :-)
Chris
Von: Justin Mclean
Gesendet: Montag, 14. April 2014 06:34
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache
Hi,
I think at the very least we need to state that it is alpha software [1], for
use by bleeding-edge developers and list what doesn't work in the RELEASE_NOTES.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#release-types
I agree. As long as the release is properly marked as Alpha quality and
with a version number that indicates the same - 0.01 will do ;-) - everyone
will know to not rely on this for major mission critical enterprise
applications.
I'll get on testing as soon as I get these pesky clients off my back
Everything you pointed out is a valid issue. The question is whether it
is a blocker for a 0.0.1 release. IMO, if the two packages can build
working examples and the binary kits can be installed and work in FB that
is good enough for this initial release.
-Alex
On 4/13/14 9:34 PM, "Justin Mclea
Hi,
> I think compiler/commandline isn't intended to work from that folder. It
> gets copied into the "SDK".
Even if it does It will still have the newline issue and this should be pointed
out in the README or RELEASE_NOTES. I certainly expected them to work.
> It's a good question as to how "
I think compiler/commandline isn't intended to work from that folder. It
gets copied into the "SDK".
It's a good question as to how "self-sufficient" this kit needs to be when
it is really intended as an upstream distribution for FlexJS. IMO, this
kit is successful when its build script runs suc
HI,
OK made it a bit further but think we have some issues.
In in compiler/commandline both mxmlc and compc give errors if you try and run
them which looks like a windows new line issue.
Even when I fix that I get this:
Using Flex SDK: /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.12released/
Error
. April 2014 10:32
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 RC1
HI,
> Falcon is only a compiler. It copies the Flex SDKs debugger (FDB) in
> order to provide the equivalent functionality.
Seems a big dependancy to have just for the debugger. As F
Hi,
> This is a frequent puzzle for me with Ant. Sometimes Ant is able to
> create the chain of missing folders and sometimes it won't.
Managed to get further with:
mkdir -p
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlexFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.0.1-src/compiler/generated/dist/sdk/bin
mkdir -p
/
HI,
> Falcon is only a compiler. It copies the Flex SDKs debugger (FDB) in
> order to provide the equivalent functionality.
Seems a big dependancy to have just for the debugger. As Flex is Apache license
could be grab the binary and take the few files(?) we need from that? Not that
I think thi
On 4/12/14 3:57 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>What the deal with having to manually set up JFLEX? As far as I can see
>JFLEX is under a BSD license - see http://jflex.de/copying.html.
Ah cool. Thanks for seeing that. I've been using 1.4 since the donation.
Looks like with 1.5 they've mo
On 4/12/14 4:07 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm also a little confused to why the Flex SDK is required as a
>prerequisite for Falcon. Can anyone explain why?
Falcon is only a compiler. It copies the Flex SDKs debugger (FDB) in
order to provide the equivalent functionality.
-Alex
Hi,
I'm also a little confused to why the Flex SDK is required as a prerequisite
for Falcon. Can anyone explain why?
Thank,
Justin
Hi,
What the deal with having to manually set up JFLEX? As far as I can see JFLEX
is under a BSD license - see http://jflex.de/copying.html.
Currently I'm not able to build FalconFX. I assume it's probably something I've
done wrong but no idea what - anyone have any ideas?
Buildfile:
/Users/j
Please place all discussion in this thread.
Thanks,
-Alex
15 matches
Mail list logo
