On Feb 23, 2013 4:53 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Sounds like a dubious reason to me. Writing a script to copy the sdk
to a
> > special directory and then building the release artifact would violate
this
> > rule?
> Well there's no way we going to make it match on windows and OSX.
>
Hi,
> Sounds like a dubious reason to me. Writing a script to copy the sdk to a
> special directory and then building the release artifact would violate this
> rule?
Well there's no way we going to make it match on windows and OSX.
Thinking about again I actually like the release managers name i
Sounds like a dubious reason to me. Writing a script to copy the sdk to a
special directory and then building the release artifact would violate this
rule?
This would be much easier than writing a tool to fix the paths after the
build process.
Om
On Feb 23, 2013 3:29 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
Mac users shouldn't have to work outside the user folder
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Om wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/22/13 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> >> What would it take to get the CI server to
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/22/13 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> >> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
> > We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may
> be
> > against policy to sign and re
On 2/22/13 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> HI,
>
>> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
> We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may be
> against policy to sign and release them.
>
>> And what would its path look like?
> A little ugly a
HI,
> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may be
against policy to sign and release them.
> And what would its path look like?
A little ugly and Hudson would get the blame :-)
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\wor
9 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
I have to turn off the computer for tonight, but I took a quick look.
For bubble, most of it looks like anti-aliasing differences, but I'm
surprised the font at the bottom is showing a different as well. I'll try
t
your adobe email.
> Yes, I'm on the release4.9
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:04 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
>
> My tests did not fail on BubblePr
Just sent the attachements of the bubble and one of the
LangPacks/Japanese/tests on your adobe email.
Yes, I'm on the release4.9
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:04 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9
rédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:20 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
>
> Started...
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Justin Mclean
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:02 AM
> To: dev@flex.apach
y fix has
> been applied (but I can't do that tonight, I've got my tournament).
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Frédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:05 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex
-3 or -4 and when I check them with
ImageDiffAIR, there're no differences, what does it mean ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:20 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Started...
-Message d
with
ImageDiffAIR, there're no differences, what does it mean ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:20 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Started...
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin M
Hi,
> I'm going to try to do a run tonight.
Thanks.
Justin
Started...
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:02 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Hi,
I did find one Flex Unit issue in that it's missing some of the new
locales that the Apache Flex SDK now has
I'm going to try to do a run tonight.
On 2/18/13 8:29 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So far on OSX I've:
> 1. checked the md5 hashes and that the files are correctly signed - all good.
> 2. src compiles with an ant build.
> 3. run ant framework-rsls and ant other.locales.
> 4. Run makeAp
Hi,
it's a Flex Builder integrated Flex Unit issue not a Flex Unit issue as such.
Will see if I can find a way to fix it.
Justin
Hi,
>> I did find one Flex Unit issue in that it's missing some of the new locales
>> that the Apache Flex SDK now has, but that was the same for the 4.9.0
>> release.
> Are you talking about apache rb ? experimental rb or another one ?
Neither.
It's the Flex Unit that missing localisation. eg
I'll have time to mavenize it
and run it against my air project before I go in London (on thursday).
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 5:29 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Hi,
So far on OSX
Hi,
So far on OSX I've:
1. checked the md5 hashes and that the files are correctly signed - all good.
2. src compiles with an ant build.
3. run ant framework-rsls and ant other.locales.
4. Run makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder.sh to create an SDK that FB can use.
5. Set up a largish project to use thi
21 matches
Mail list logo
