[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13659522#comment-13659522
]
James Roland Cabresos commented on FLEX-33563:
--
This is not a
ipt is going all the way.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:11 PM, James Roland Cabresos
wrote:
> Flex currently, already has it's own language features that exist in MXML.
> This came to be known to most people as Flex. I get ask around a lot and
> most people think Flex is a language rather
Flex currently, already has it's own language features that exist in MXML.
This came to be known to most people as Flex. I get ask around a lot and
most people think Flex is a language rather than an SDK or a framework for
Actionscript. If you're going to think of a name, I think sticking with
Flex
+1 for these language features!
abstract classes
generics
method overloading
reflection perhaps?
These features are the biggest selling point of the famous programming
languages today. I maybe right or wrong, but I think having these features
may help targeting HTML/JS apps.
On Mon, Feb 4, 201
I can't even keep up with all the activity going on here!
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Avi Kessner wrote:
> Very leet (1337) :-)
> On Jan 28, 2013 8:57 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
> > I have 13307 emails from the dev list since 3/2/12!
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:
I'm starting to love what I read in the mailing list lately, lots of things
going on!
+1 for Apache FlexMojos!
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Jose Barragan <
jose.barra...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> +1 I'm absolutely involve in flexmojos/flex-maven-plugin initiative :)
>
> For backward compat
