I'm starting to love what I read in the mailing list lately, lots of things
going on!

+1 for Apache FlexMojos!

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Jose Barragan <
jose.barra...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:

> +1 I'm absolutely involve in flexmojos/flex-maven-plugin initiative  :)
>
> For backward compatibility "Apache Flexmojos" sounds great too
>
> As well with Chris, flex-maven-plugin from the scratch looks like the best
> way for the future Apache Flex SDK's life
>
> --
> Jose Barragan
> Software Architect Chief
> Codeoscopic Madrid
> C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92.
> Planta 5.  505.
> 28020 Madrid.
> Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
>
> On Jan 24, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 as well to Chris's plans.
> >
> > The future is Flex 4.9+ so better to do something from scratch that will
> > learn from all flexmojos experience. People that need old SDKs and
> > workflows always can stay in old SDKs and plugins.
> >
> > Like the idea to support IDEs so they can integrate more easily the
> > workflow of the plugin.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/1/24 Patrick Heinzelmann <patrick.heinzelm...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Great to see where our yesterday's discussion on the flexmojos list
> ended
> >> ;) Great respect to Velo (and Chris now) for pushing the Flexmojos and
> >> supporting the community by answering thousands of questions on the
> >> flexmojos dev list.
> >>
> >> I think that Chris approach is the right way, to reuse some of the stuff
> >> and remove a some of the legacy stuff from flexmojos to build a Apache
> Flex
> >> version of flexmojos. Especially that you need to deploy 8 FDKs is a
> >> nightmare for people trying and use to build flexmojos 6.
> >>
> >> About IDE support, like I mentioned yesterday on the flexmojos list. I'm
> >> currently working a new m2e-connector for Flexmojos and FlashBuilder,
> which
> >> I will hopefully release this weekend and also donate to Apache Flex.
> >>
> >> Regards Patrick
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 24.01.2013 um 14:38 schrieb John Cunliffe <mahn...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> +1 for solid maven support in flex
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Roland Zwaga <rol...@stackandheap.com
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> from what I know of the process:
> >>>> -Velo needs to sign an ICLA
> >>>> -Code can be donated as a JIRA issue, but it can also just be sent to
> >> one
> >>>> of the committers who puts it in SVN
> >>>> -When the source is actually released by Apache Flex I believe the
> >> headers
> >>>> and packages need to be in order, bot for
> >>>> the inital donation this isn't required (please correct me if I'm
> wrong
> >>>> anyone)
> >>>>
> >>>> Oh, and I'm not sure if the current open source license if compatible
> >> with
> >>>> the Apache license, so how that would
> >>>> work exactly I don't know either. Please, people who are in the know,
> >>>> comment on this :)
> >>>>
> >>>> cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Roland
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24 January 2013 13:12, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
> >>>> christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Yeah ... the problem is ... could someone please write down what
> would
> >> be
> >>>>> needed?
> >>>>> - Which agreements have to be signed?
> >>>>> - How is the code actually donated? (Jira Issue with 60MB
> attachment?)
> >>>>> - What steps have to be done before the code is allowed to be added
> to
> >>>> the
> >>>>> Apache code repo (Headers, Package Names, Artifact IDs? And does his
> >> have
> >>>>> to happen also for "scratchpad code"?)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Chris
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>>>> Von: Roland Zwaga [mailto:rol...@stackandheap.com]
> >>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2013 12:57
> >>>>> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>>> Betreff: Re: Donation of Flexmojos
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think you you make a very clear and sensible case.
> >>>>> +1 to accepting Velo's donation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 24 January 2013 12:22, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
> >>>>> christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> after me telling the other Flexmojos users on the FM Mailinglist
> that
> >>>>>> we are working on a brand-new flex plugin for maven. Velo said that
> he
> >>>>>> would be willing to donate Flexmojos to Apache. We just should tell
> >>>>>> him where to sign and what to do (Even if the "doing" would be
> >>>>>> something that would have to be done by me)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think it would be a good idea to take this offer. But I wouldn't
> >>>>>> recommend directly using this code as a directly as the official
> Flex
> >>>>>> Plugin. More I would like to add it as some sort of scratchpad
> project
> >>>>>> and use the existing parts to build a new plugin and to do things
> >>>>>> differently where things aren't solved ideally.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The reason for this is that Flexmojos has become a beast to
> maintain,
> >>>>>> as it supports Adobe Flex 2 up to 4.6 and with my changes in the
> >>>>>> Flexmojos 6.x branch it even supports Apache Flex 4.8 and 4.9.
> >>>>>> Currently you need about 8 complete FDKs to have the Testsuite
> working
> >>>>>> and the mixing of group-Ids (com.adobe.flex and org.apache.flex) has
> >>>>> made everything even worse.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The testsuite is full of tests which made sense once, but today it
> >>>>>> seems impossible to find out what they were initially meant to test.
> >>>>>> Usually when adding support for a new FDK the testsuite had errors
> and
> >>>>>> I simply made them pass again. I would like to setup a clean
> testsuite
> >>>>>> that has a more clean structure AND has documented Tests to avoid
> >>>>>> problems like this in the future.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Flexmojos has grown more and more over the years making it one
> >>>>>> monolithic plugin. Everybody using IntelliJ will probably have
> noticed
> >>>>>> one problem that is related to this ... IntelliJ keeps on
> complaining
> >>>>>> about no storagePass property being configured. This property is
> >>>>>> mandatory for creating signed Air application, and therefore is a
> >>>>>> required property, but for normal Flex application it is optional.
> >>>>>> Splitting up everything into separate mojos would make a lot of
> stuff
> >>>>> easier.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The next thing is that I would like to completely overwork the
> >>>>>> Test-support. Currently Flexmojos opens a set of sockets and
> compiles
> >>>>>> a dedicated testrunner SWF to connect to these sockets. There have
> >>>>>> been quite some problems with this. I would therefore like to change
> >>>>>> this that the swf is served by a mini-webserver (20 LOC) and simply
> >>>>>> communicates with a rudimentary webservice on the same port.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In the TestSupport I am also thinking about using the Flex
> >>>>>> Log-Framework to support several concurrent streams of log-data and
> >>>>>> provide the means to save the log output together with the
> >>>>>> test-results. Currently debugging tests is pretty nasty.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Last not Least I think with a new plugin we could optimize tool
> >>>>>> support much better by including the Tool vendors in the process
> (I'm
> >>>>>> just thinking about the copy-resources problems with IntelliJ).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Chris
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> regards,
> >>>>> Roland
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Roland Zwaga
> >>>>> Senior Consultant | Stack & Heap BVBA
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +32 (0)486 16 12 62 | rol...@stackandheap.com |
> >>>>> +http://www.stackandheap.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://zwaga.blogspot.com
> >>>>> http://www.springactionscript.org
> >>>>> http://www.as3commons.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> regards,
> >>>> Roland
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Roland Zwaga
> >>>> Senior Consultant | Stack & Heap BVBA
> >>>>
> >>>> +32 (0)486 16 12 62 | rol...@stackandheap.com |
> >>>> http://www.stackandheap.com
> >>>>
> >>>> http://zwaga.blogspot.com
> >>>> http://www.springactionscript.org
> >>>> http://www.as3commons.org
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Director de Tecnología
> > M: +34 607 22 60 05
> > F:  +34 912 94 80 80
> > http://www.codeoscopic.com
> > http://www.directwriter.es
> > http://www.avant2.es
>
>

Reply via email to