Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-11 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/11/17, 10:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >I just had a look and the changes look valid. The only thing I think I >should change, is that it seems as if prior to your change, I needed two >compilations AS & JS and therefore there were two Mojos: CompileASMojo >and CompileJSMojo

[4.16.0] # Apache Flex SDK 4.16.0 nightly build 256: Successful

2017-03-11 Thread flex . ci . builds
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #256 - Successful Changes since last build: No changes For more information, check the console output at http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/256/.

AW: [FlexJS] [Maven] Changes to the Maven build

2017-03-11 Thread Christofer Dutz
Just have a look at the examples ... Or use an archetype ... Both should contain what you are looking for. Chris Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: piotrz Datum: 11.03.17 22:19 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [FlexJ

Re: [FlexJS] [Maven] Changes to the Maven build

2017-03-11 Thread piotrz
Hi Chris, How actually will look like pom for new FlexJS project? Can you post example? It would be without war part? Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Maven-Changes-to-the-Maven-

[FlexJS] [Maven] Changes to the Maven build

2017-03-11 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Guys, Today I implemented a new Mojo “PackageJsMojo”. I wasn’t that satisfied with the need to specify the war and the buildhelper mojo in each js build. Now the build automatically produces the war files and attaches them to the build. So, both the war and the buildhelper are now obsolete.

Re: [FlexJS] Dual branch

2017-03-11 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Alex, I just had a look and the changes look valid. The only thing I think I should change, is that it seems as if prior to your change, I needed two compilations AS & JS and therefore there were two Mojos: CompileASMojo and CompileJSMojo. I think now we need only one. If the current state i

Re: [ApacheCon] Let's make it happen :-)

2017-03-11 Thread piotrz
Hi Chris, I was able to upload it on my own. :) Thanks, Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ApacheCon-Let-s-make-it-happen-tp58856p60364.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing

Re: [ApacheCon] Let's make it happen :-)

2017-03-11 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Piotr, No probably the system where you usually submit your talk proposals. Let’s say this time the procedure was slightly different. Just send me a picture off list and I’ll take care of that ☺ Chris Am 11.03.17, 07:41 schrieb "piotrz" : Justin, You mean that profile when I