On 7/11/16, 12:23 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>It could be that instead of subclassing Flash objects, we should be using
>composition instead…
Maybe. I started out subclassing because it would be lower overhead, and
so the main class could be the initial class in the SWF. I think the
initial entry po
It turns out I needed to add the relevant swc files to the framework project
I was tinkering with, not to my test project. The disadvantage of this is
that .actionScriptProperties, which is in git, gets changed.
Here's another video describing first what not to do (add swc files to test
project),
Hi Chris,
Those three parts seems ok to me.
Thanks for asking
2016-07-11 9:08 GMT+02:00 Harbs :
> One nitpick here:
>
> falcon contains both the falcon and falconjx compiler. Are both considered
> “FlexJS”?
>
> On Jul 11, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Christofer Dutz
> wrote:
>
> > So are we agreeing on s
It could be that instead of subclassing Flash objects, we should be using
composition instead…
On Jul 11, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Harbs wrote:
> Sure they are.
>
> Try this:
> var myRect:org.apache.flex.core.graphics.Rect = new
> org.apache.flex.core.graphics.Rect();
> var transform:Matrix = myRec
Sure they are.
Try this:
var myRect:org.apache.flex.core.graphics.Rect = new
org.apache.flex.core.graphics.Rect();
var transform:Matrix = myRect.transform;
On Jul 11, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/11/16, 12:06 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> I believe Bitmaps use Rectangles.
>
>
On 7/11/16, 12:06 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I believe Bitmaps use Rectangles.
OK but flash.display.Bitmap should not be exposed to the SWC's API
surface. Bitmap should be wrapped and rectangles in its API should be
wrapped as well.
>
>FlexJS subclasses DisplayObject which returns a Flash Matrix fo
On 7/11/16, 12:09 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> I can’t find the post, but I definitely remember Lizhi stating that he
>>wrote the code.
>
>Nor could I and from memory I don’t think we go a definite answer.
>
>A guess would be the initial check in was based on code from an old
>version o
I couldn't either:
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?*@flex.apache.org:lte=1y:Lizhi%20Matrix
But I don't know if I used the correct search phrases. Just wanted to remind
you of lists.apache.org ... it's really helpful :-)
Chris
Von: Harbs
Gesendet: Montag,
Hi,
> I can’t find the post, but I definitely remember Lizhi stating that he wrote
> the code.
Nor could I and from memory I don’t think we go a definite answer.
A guess would be the initial check in was based on code from an old version of
Shumway but not I'm 100% sure. Notice (for instance)
One nitpick here:
falcon contains both the falcon and falconjx compiler. Are both considered
“FlexJS”?
On Jul 11, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> So are we agreeing on splitting up our codebase into these three parts (even
> if two of the repos currently still have different names)
On 7/10/16, 11:59 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>So are we agreeing on splitting up our codebase into these three parts
>(even if two of the repos currently still have different names)?
>
>- flexjs-compiler
>
>- flexjs-typedefs
>
>- flexjs-framework
I haven't looked at how hard it is to rename
Hi,
I still think using common interfaces as contract for writing code would
simplify things. We could have "FlexEvent" for example and base the API on
this, just as an example: There could be a "FlashFlexEvent" which extends
FlexEvent with things specific to Flash and a JSFlexEvent that has t
I believe Bitmaps use Rectangles.
FlexJS subclasses DisplayObject which returns a Flash Matrix for the transform.
IF you try to use transformPoint() on that, it’ll return (and expects) a Flash
Point.
I’m sure there’s more examples.
On Jul 11, 2016, at 10:03 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7
On 7/10/16, 11:59 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>One simple example is clone() on on both Point and Rectangle. Flash
>returns a flash Rectangle, but Flex is expecting a flex Rectangle.
>Another one that I ran into in my own code is union() in Rectangle.
>
>The casting that I did, did not even work. The co
So are we agreeing on splitting up our codebase into these three parts (even if
two of the repos currently still have different names)?
- flexjs-compiler
- flexjs-typedefs
- flexjs-framework
In this case I could start preparing things by renaming the "extern" stuff to
"typedef"? I would also
15 matches
Mail list logo
