On 7/10/16, 11:59 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>So are we agreeing on splitting up our codebase into these three parts >(even if two of the repos currently still have different names)? > >- flexjs-compiler > >- flexjs-typedefs > >- flexjs-framework I haven't looked at how hard it is to rename a repo, but if we can live without renaming it I think it would save us all time. What would we really get out of renaming the repos? > > >In this case I could start preparing things by renaming the "extern" >stuff to "typedef"? I would also call the Maven classifier "typedef". Are >the JSSWCs from the asjs bundle typedefs or are they something different? The JSSWCs are something different. They are internal JS APIs upstream to the JS implementation in other SWCs. They don't represent 3rd party APIs. -Alex
