Hi
> It would be great if folks who are good at catching these things could
> take a look at the nightly build and/or the commit emails.
Mind posting a link to the binary?
Thanks,
Justin
I believe I have successfully removed the Flex SDK jars from the FalconJX
package without breaking anything. This should eliminate the unintended
packaging of the Adobe jars and also not require any new changes to NOTICE.
It would be great if folks who are good at catching these things could
take
Canceling this RC.
On 11/4/15, 9:08 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>@Justin, good catch there. I forgot we have to check certain things in
>the binary packages.
>
>@Chris, if you have the cycles, go ahead and post the bits and open the
>discussion thread. I’m going to take some time to add checks for
On 11/6/15, 12:47 PM, "jude" wrote:
>I said this in another thread but since you asked I would say this would
>be
>the perfect workflow for me (for both Flex and FlexJS):
>
>1. Provide URL to source on Github (the project would have to be on github
>obviously)
Our repos are already mirrored to
On 11/6/15, 12:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>>
>> I’m sure in the early days of FlexJS and Falcon, going away for a while
>> and coming back probably didn’t work. But is that still true? And if
>>so,
>> can you just blow away your repos and re-grab flex-as
+1 Binding
Licenses: OK
ReadMe files: OK, no errors
Release Notes: OK
I was able to build everything, including examples.
Examples ran without errors or failing.
Peter Ent
Adobe Systems
On 11/2/15, 8:58 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>This is vote for the 0.5.0 release of Apache FlexJS.
>
>T
I said this in another thread but since you asked I would say this would be
the perfect workflow for me (for both Flex and FlexJS):
1. Provide URL to source on Github (the project would have to be on github
obviously)
2. I create a local repository from that
3. I open FB and import a default *exis
>
> I hope Chris will
> stick around to do it and that others can help them. I will try to help
> with refactoring needed to make Maven work better. Those changes usually
> help make sure we have the loose-coupling we need between modules.
I think that is a good start.
> I’m
> not that i
When I was working on TLF and Flex SDK it took about 3 days to a week to
get the "sources" setup. I documented all the steps in the wiki and have
went back to them ~3 times to get things setup again. It shouldn't be that
hard.
I could download and setup a new Flex SDK binary for Flash Builder easi
That was an awesome list! Thanks. Just curious, can text layout end up
affecting more than two lines back? I still think it boils down to
rectangles on a path but the path may not be a straight horizontal line or
always going left-to-right, and you sometimes have to go back a bit.
-Alex
On 11/
Let me see if I can summarize these various “simplify the build threads
here”.
For me, I have to go by what I read on our mailing lists. Maybe there is
some silent faction waiting for simpler builds, but I am going to reward
those who speak up by trying to work on their issues. It doesn’t seem
r
On 11/6/15, 2:06 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>I don't think there should be a problem with this. Unless there are some
>technical issues with your restructuring proposal, we all should be able
>to
>come to a consensus and move ahead.
>
>I believe the best ti
On 11/6/15, 1:26 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>Chris,
>
>I read your email twice. I don't see what I was expecting. Here are a
>couple of simple questions:
>
>1. As a FlexJS SDK Developer, I want to build the FlexJS SDK. I want to
>go to the flex-asjs fold
I’ll give this a go again on Sunday. Even if I do get this setup, the fact that
I’m having so much trouble is probably an indicator that others who want to
contribute will also.
Bottom line: The simpler we make it to contribute, the more likely we will get
more contributors. The more contributo
Send an email to dev-unsubscr...@flex.apache.org
[1] http://flex.apache.org/community-mailinglists.html
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Jack Freudenheim [mailto:j...@sounder.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 9:19 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: vector error
unsubscribe
On 1
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Harbs wrote:
> I agree with Justin here. I’ve been playing with FlexJS for a good few
> weeks already and I still do not have a good setup for working on the SDK.
> I would have been productive a long time ago already if we would have the
> following:
>
> 1. Simple
I don't think there should be a problem with this. Unless there are some
technical issues with your restructuring proposal, we all should be able to
come to a consensus and move ahead.
I believe the best time to do this would be - right after the FlexJS 0.5
release.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Nov 6, 20
Well in order to seriously do this refactoring, you would also have to do the
refactoring of the directory structure. This was ne main reason for me never
having continued down that path as I knew I would have to hand-merge stuff for
quite some time. So in order to do something like this, we wou
I agree with Justin here. I’ve been playing with FlexJS for a good few weeks
already and I still do not have a good setup for working on the SDK. I would
have been productive a long time ago already if we would have the following:
1. Simple building of the SDK. Environment variables are tough to
Yes, the AntRun Maven plugin is a good stop gap measure. Is this an option
for FlexJS? As I understand the way FlexJS is built right now, there are
several dependencies to download and build before compiling the FlexJS
SDK. Can we mavenize the rest and use AntRun for the build FlexJS part?
If y
>
> What isn’t clear to me is that there is something about text layout to be
> “figured out”. I’m not convinced there is a “best practice” for text
> layout that covers international, effects, character positioning that
> isn’t on a horizontal line, etc. Many of the folks who worked on Adobe
>
Well here goes:
Initially we have to separate between the compiler and the framework.
Converting the compiler to maven is easier as it's simply a Java program.
Converting the framework build to maven is eventually a little problematic.
Currently there is only one maven plugin for building flex
Chris,
I read your email twice. I don't see what I was expecting. Here are a
couple of simple questions:
1. As a FlexJS SDK Developer, I want to build the FlexJS SDK. I want to
go to the flex-asjs folder and run mvn install. I want the entire SDK
built and ready to release.
2. As a FlexJS
Hi,
> And I’d like to hear from others: Would better build scripts cause you to
> contribute more?
Yep. With limited volunteer time the less time people can spend on setup the
better.
> Would switching from Ant to Maven cause you to
> contribute more?
A simpler build would help, I’m not that
HI,
> Nobody is saying simpler builds wouldn’t help. But how much?
A lot I think. Developer are unable to contribute if they can’t compile and
test their changes.
> More than a more functional DataGrid? Or a more Spark and/or MX-like
> component set
> that reduces migration time for your ap
Ok ... let me respond to some of this:
Alex wrote:
> IMO, the good and bad of Apache being a “do-ocracy” is that, while you can
> work on pretty much whatever interests you, at least in this project,
I definitely don't agree ... it's far from a "do-oracy" it's a "discuss-oracy"
... I bet the amo
I would love to have simple build (doesn't matter ant or maven)
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Nov 6, 2015 14:23, "jude" wrote:
> What needs to change? Please list things out here. I started working on a
> very small UI that's goal is to help install FlexJS, create new project
What needs to change? Please list things out here. I started working on a
very small UI that's goal is to help install FlexJS, create new project and
compile that project (and return errors and warnings). Right now it's just
calling out to the ant build and running different targets on it. I don't
On 11/5/15, 11:30 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>I think trying to have a simpler build would help a lot. This ties into
>what Chris has just posted as well.
Nobody is saying simpler builds wouldn’t help. But how much? More than a
more functional DataGrid? Or a more Spark and/or MX-like compon
29 matches
Mail list logo
