Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration

2015-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
Hmm. The merge went smoothly. All tests pass. I haven’t tried out flex-oem-compiler.jar, so I’ll do that tomorrow. -Alex On 6/3/15, 10:47 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I’m going to give it a try. I want to get your stuff into the nightly >builds so folks can try it and the other changes we’ve be

Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration

2015-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
I’m going to give it a try. I want to get your stuff into the nightly builds so folks can try it and the other changes we’ve been making. On 6/3/15, 1:31 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >You can do it if you like or want to speed up on it or any other reasons >but it wont solve the current issue I

Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration

2015-06-03 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
You can do it if you like or want to speed up on it or any other reasons but it wont solve the current issue I have and potentialy the one other people will have but if you think you have a good reason enough to do it, please, be my guest. --- Message initial --- De : "Alex Harui" Envoyé : 3

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex Installer 3.2

2015-06-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 6/3/15, 12:32 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > > >>You will have to uninstall Installer 3.1 (which on Mac means not only > >> moving to the trash but emptying the trash) before running the exe or > >>dmg > >> file. > >> > > > >I hope

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex Installer 3.2

2015-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/3/15, 12:32 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >>You will have to uninstall Installer 3.1 (which on Mac means not only >> moving to the trash but emptying the trash) before running the exe or >>dmg >> file. >> > >I hope that is only for testing the release candidate? For the end users, >the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex Installer 3.2

2015-06-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi, > > Per [1] I think we can enter the testing phase for the Installer. If > anybody has a last-minute feature they want to get in, I’m willing to back > up to the Last Call phase. > > There is already a release branch, but I think so much w

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex Installer 3.2

2015-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
Hi, Per [1] I think we can enter the testing phase for the Installer. If anybody has a last-minute feature they want to get in, I’m willing to back up to the Last Call phase. There is already a release branch, but I think so much work has been done on the develop branch that we should just kill

Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration

2015-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
How about if I take a shot at merging IDEA into develop? -Alex On 6/3/15, 12:23 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >Actually Im out so I will do that tomorrow > >--- Message initial --- > >De : "Alex Harui" >Envoyé : 3 juin 2015 19:33 >A : dev@flex.apache.org >Objet : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] Intell

Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration

2015-06-03 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Actually Im out so I will do that tomorrow --- Message initial --- De : "Alex Harui" Envoyé : 3 juin 2015 19:33 A : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration On 6/3/15, 9:59 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >I updated the dev branch 1 or 2 hours ago and had the s

Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration

2015-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/3/15, 9:59 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >I updated the dev branch 1 or 2 hours ago and had the same issue, will >try to fix it later tonight before finishing FDB and merge the comipler >part. OK. The CI server said the build of my changes passed. So, when you are ready feel free to merg

RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration

2015-06-03 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
I updated the dev branch 1 or 2 hours ago and had the same issue, will try to fix it later tonight before finishing FDB and merge the comipler part. Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015

Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration

2015-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
I made some changes to the oem and swfutils last night. Hopefully that will help. I’m going to try to multi-task this week and get the Installer to where it can install things properly. I just built it and the progress squares did not fill in correctly but all the files were installed. Then wh

RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration

2015-06-03 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
I switched on the develop branch but have to fix the swfutils part as as I said before it doesn't work for me, the copy never occurs, will do that as soon as I can to be able to continue the FDB part. Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: AW: A

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

2015-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
Yeah, I think many of us wish we could build a portfolio of products that we could sell many times, but FOSS and technology in general is making many things free or so cheap that a lot of folks have to give up on selling products and turn to selling services, supplies or accessories instead. And s

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

2015-06-03 Thread Michael Schmalle
I am just being devils advocate with my own mind. I really don't have interest in talking about language features. :) You have to realize, from my end, it's a black box with "all these companies". I mean I only have so much time and there is a fine line that I can give of my time for free to let

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

2015-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/3/15, 8:04 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >No I just meant there will never be an AS4.(generics, first class >metadata, >method overloading types, things other languages are getting, just look at >Java8). They kewn they had to give an option of lambda functions because >sometimes Java is ju

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

2015-06-03 Thread Michael Schmalle
No I just meant there will never be an AS4.(generics, first class metadata, method overloading types, things other languages are getting, just look at Java8). They kewn they had to give an option of lambda functions because sometimes Java is just to verbose to do simple things, AS3 can be looked at

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

2015-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/3/15, 3:03 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Frédéric THOMAS >wrote: > >> > >From my perspective FlexJS AND FalconJX(vanilla), specifically the >>AS3 >> > >language has an up hill battle because, we are not evolving the >>language >> > >like TypeScript and suc

Re: [DISCUSS] The Future of MD5Checker

2015-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/3/15, 4:04 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote: >Side bar in the same context. Are we able to get permission to re-host >some of the files on apache servers since we are enforcing the users to >agree to the legal aspects(licenses / terms of usage) anyways? I haven’t tried for the Adobe stuff.

RE: [DISCUSS] The Future of MD5Checker

2015-06-03 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
Side bar in the same context. Are we able to get permission to re-host some of the files on apache servers since we are enforcing the users to agree to the legal aspects(licenses / terms of usage) anyways? -Mark

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

2015-06-03 Thread Michael Schmalle
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > > >From my perspective FlexJS AND FalconJX(vanilla), specifically the AS3 > > >language has an up hill battle because, we are not evolving the language > > >like TypeScript and such and all the other techs. > > > > Yeah, people like new, bu

Re: FLEX-34876

2015-06-03 Thread piotrz
Hi Harbs, Really sorry for the late response. I'm lack of time lately. :( I will try to analyze you example tomorrow or in the weekend, understand the bug and prepare the tests. Let's create separate branch for that work called: "FLEX-34876_paste_with_multiple_paragraphs" or something like that -