One problem you have in your script is that you are not actually creating a
toggleSwitch in your code.
It should be something like
var tog:ToggleSwitch = new ToggleSwitch;
You have some options for assigning the skin.
If you are creating a class reference in the style section, such as
s|Tog
OK, I just pushed the one fix to ant_on_air I wanted to get into this
release and pushed Josh Tynjala’s pull requests as well (Thanks Josh!).
What else needs to be done before going to the next stage of the release
process? I’m willing to spend some time on as3httpclient integration if
needed.
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities/pull/6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Haha, this would be a full time job to do that Alex. :)
Mike
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I also remembered this morning that I speculated on the impact on compiler
> performance of replacing Jburg with a FalconJX “back-end” that outputs
> SWFs. It isn’t on my list of
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities/pull/5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities/pull/4
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
On 4/28/15, 1:03 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>>>Also according to [1] terms like "Flash application” and “Flash content”
>>> are not allowed to be used, which the content currently also uses.
>>
>> I’ll ask Adobe legal how important that is. For now I left "Adobe
>>Flash"
>> in the list on som
I also remembered this morning that I speculated on the impact on compiler
performance of replacing Jburg with a FalconJX “back-end” that outputs
SWFs. It isn’t on my list of priorities since we have a compiler that
works, but it just occurred to me that maybe Michael Schmalle and some
others migh
Hi,
>> Should be “LifeCycle":
>> grep "LIveCycle” ./content/doc/flex/using/*
>
> Didn’t understand this.
Very minor - the “I” should be a ”i”.
> I’ll leave these for someone else to determine if they can be replaced
> with Apache Flex. If any can’t be then we’ll add Adobe Flex to the list.
So
I just committed a bunch of updates to the trademark lists. Thanks Justin
for finding these.
On 4/27/15, 3:41 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>There’s still a couple of minor trademarks issue that need fixing up.
>
>grep "Nokia" ./content/doc/flex/using/*
I replaced Nokia with Flex just for
I would like to adjust my Maven-Packaging targets to produce valid artifacts
again in order to use them in Flexmojos. So instead of refactoring the entire
SDKs I just wanted to know what has changed ...
Ok ... I think I'll ask the JBurg guy, if he could deploy JBurg to maven
central ... that wo
11 matches
Mail list logo
