I pretty much agree with these suggestions.
#7 is of less importance than #8
#4 is probably more important than #5, but both seem like a lot of effort. I
guess we’d need volunteers who are familiar in the respective languages to lead
the translation and maintain the specific areas. If we have v
>>Right now none because the property is private, and if it wasn't, just
subclasses.
That sounds right to me.
-Darrell
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Héctor A wrote:
>
> >>property of type NavigationStack, marked with [ExcludeClass], what does
>> that mean?
>>
>> [ExcludeClass] prevents Flas
The output can be misleading. Find the "could not find file for class" and
check those first.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
Sorry, I din't provide some obvious details.
- Yes, I have the latest code
- I do see the file C:\p\flexroot\git\fl
Sorry, I din't provide some obvious details.
- Yes, I have the latest code
- I do see the file C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-asjs\
examples\ChartExample\bin\js-debug\products\Product.js in the file system.
Not sure why the java.io.FileNotFoundException for that file.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4
I am back in FlexJS after a while and I notice that the examples dont
compile anymore. What am I missing?
Here is the stack trace from the ChartExample compilation via build.xml
Buildfile: C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-asjs\examples\ChartExample\build.xml
clean:
[delete] Deleting directory
C:\p\fle
The board member who has been trying to follow the project recommends we
put the issue of US vs Int’l English to a vote. Apparently, the HTTP
project did so in the past (and decided on US English). So this is now a
discuss thread leading to a vote.
Personally, I don’t want to just choose one ove
On 11/24/14, 1:00 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>The problem is definitely that they dynamically fire up build agents.
>These contain the master credentials for writing to the repos. So I guess
>this is a good reason for them not giving full access.
I think you’re saying their security scheme i
On 11/24/14, 1:07 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Then my assumption was correct. In the ant build they bundled the content
>of the other modules into each opt module.
I’m not sure I understand. The classes in flex-messaging-opt.jar are not
in the other jars in the Ant build of BlazeDS, and the
Harbs,
If you think that preparing such shape it is a good idea please send here
list of class which you have created and which you potentially want to test.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble
Harbs,
For sure TableTests won't work and They should be completle rewrite. I could
prepare some shape for such tests and based on this shape show you where you
can put your tests logic.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex
I just poked through the tests a bit. The TableTests are definitely not going
to work. They look like they were written for the old Table architecture. The
class names do not even match.
I should rewrite the tests to work on tables, but I have no idea how the tests
are supposed to work.
Is the
Hi Harbs,
That is great!!
Before the merge with your branch I had everything set up in my IDE Intellij
and was able to build project and debug, but now I can't figure out why it
doesn't work. That's why I've added to our ant script ability to build
project in debug mode. :)
In build.properties y
Then my assumption was correct. In the ant build they bundled the content of
the other modules into each opt module.
It might be due to a lot of problems I had I'm my life with double packaged
classes that this does cause headaches with me. What happens if the user
deploys an application with a
The problem is definitely that they dynamically fire up build agents. These
contain the master credentials for writing to the repos. So I guess this is a
good reason for them not giving full access.
Anyway puppet would have been an additional option to automate things. Not to
actually operate a
14 matches
Mail list logo