Stop hijacking other threads ;-)
Please create a dedicated thread to talk about this issue, otherwise
valuable information will get lost between the two current threads and the
JIRA ticket this is being discussed in.
EdB
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/7/14, 11:
I¹m about out of time for tonight, but if I remember tomorrow, I¹ll just
copy a mustella.swc from the flex-sdk workspace unless you beat me to it.
-Alex
On 10/7/14, 11:51 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Weird, as I took a simple copy of the Œflex-sdk¹ job and renamed it Š I¹ll
>have a look when tim
On 10/7/14, 11:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> That said, I think I have successfully implemented workarounds such that
>> there is significantly less need to release the Installer, especially
>> since we don¹t have a fix for this SourceForge issue.
>
>While 4.13 is fixed 4.12 isn't (al
Weird, as I took a simple copy of the ‘flex-sdk’ job and renamed it … I’ll
have a look when time permits.
EdB
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The mustella.swc is not being built. You may have to run makemustellaswc
> in the mustella/build.xml first.
>
> On 10/7/14, 10:50
> That said, if you are limited on time and think that getting a new sdk
> release it the door is the only thing you have time for, I think we can go
> for the sdk release first
>
I’m not in a hurry to release the SDK. I’m just taking inventory, making
sure I understand all requirements and work i
Hi,
> That said, I think I have successfully implemented workarounds such that
> there is significantly less need to release the Installer, especially
> since we don¹t have a fix for this SourceForge issue.
While 4.13 is fixed 4.12 isn't (along with some earlier versions) and did you
did see tha
On 10/7/14, 11:09 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>> > Can we release the SDK, without simultaneously releasing the
>>Installer?
>>
>> We can, but if people can't install it via the installer we're not going
>> to see much adoption.
>>
>
>My understanding was that Alex¹s work with Œant_on_air¹ remov
Hi,
> My understanding was that Alex’s work with ‘ant_on_air’ removed the release
> dependency between the SDK and the Installer?
Not really as ant on air is also part of the installer, yes you can use command
line ant to install but that's not the most common way of installing it. While
I've n
Hi Justin,
Every device capable (for a specific scroll case) to go beyond 30 fps should
take advantage of this change.
One more time, the improvement is observable during a user "dragged scroll"
(application framerate must be greater than 30 fps, I set it to 60 on my
devices).
Vincent.
--
Vie
Hi,
> Why do you say that people won’t be able to use the Installer?
Currently the installer fails to install the nightly build, 4.12.1, 4.11.0 and
4.9.1 SDKs. It may require some changes to work with the new release. It may be
that the various issues can be fixed by changes to the installer co
The mustella.swc is not being built. You may have to run makemustellaswc
in the mustella/build.xml first.
On 10/7/14, 10:50 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Does this look familiar to anyone, and if so, how do I fix/prevent this:
>
>basictests:
>[mxmlc] Loading configuration file
>C:\Jenk
> > Can we release the SDK, without simultaneously releasing the Installer?
>
> We can, but if people can't install it via the installer we're not going
> to see much adoption.
>
My understanding was that Alex’s work with ‘ant_on_air’ removed the release
dependency between the SDK and the Installe
On Oct 7, 2014 10:55 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m currently planning on doing an SDK-only release. However, Justin threw
> a whole bunch of Installer bugs into the JIRA. So, my question is:
>
> Can we release the SDK, without simultaneously releasing the Installer?
>
I think fixing
Hi,
> Anyone mind if I increase the default from 30 to 90 and see if Mustella has
> issues with that? I think it’s worth it given the perceived performance
> improvement and my guess is that the possible side effects are small, given
> that the field we’re messing with was marked private.
Do we k
On Oct 7, 2014 11:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’ve implemented after24’s patch and there were no objections from
> Mustella. The way I implemented the patch doesn’t automatically give the
> performance improvements he intended it to have. That is because I didn’t
> increase the defau
Hi,
> I’m currently planning on doing an SDK-only release. However, Justin threw
> a whole bunch of Installer bugs into the JIRA.
None of those bugs have to be fixed before we release, but there are a couple
of minor regression issues in there and some other issues which would be good
to fix b
Hi,
I’ve implemented after24’s patch and there were no objections from
Mustella. The way I implemented the patch doesn’t automatically give the
performance improvements he intended it to have. That is because I didn’t
increase the default rate, but kept it at 30. After24 suggests that the
performa
Hi,
I’m currently planning on doing an SDK-only release. However, Justin threw
a whole bunch of Installer bugs into the JIRA. So, my question is:
Can we release the SDK, without simultaneously releasing the Installer?
Thanks,
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrech
Please move the Installer error discussion to a new thread?
Thanks,
EdB
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I believe I have hacked enough files on our web-site and SourceForge to
> > enable 4.13.0 and 4.12.1 (and possibly earlier releases) to install
> > correct
Hi,
Does this look familiar to anyone, and if so, how do I fix/prevent this:
basictests:
[mxmlc] Loading configuration file
C:\Jenkins\workspace\(release-candidate)_flex-sdk\frameworks\flex-config.xml
[mxmlc] Loading configuration file
C:\Jenkins\workspace\(release-candidate)_flex-sdk\fra
Hi,
> I¹m confused. Why doesn¹t fixer/assignee resolve and reporter close to
> confirm the resolver¹s decision?
You can do (and certainly nothing wrong in working that way) but it's not
enforced by the current workflow and it's certainly not common practice as
shown by previous JIRA entries. I
I¹m confused. Why doesn¹t fixer/assignee resolve and reporter close to
confirm the resolver¹s decision?
On 10/7/14, 6:23 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Our workflow on closed and resolved. Note that you can skip the resolved
>step altogether and if resolved the close step is optional.
>http
Thanks a lot!
On 8 October 2014 02:19, Alex Harui wrote:
> All development ³Nightly² builds are available here:
>
> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080
>
> The installer, for example is here:
>
> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/InstallApacheFlex/
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/7/14, 11:42
Hi,
And the nightly falcon installation is broken, but this looks like an
installation script issue.
Version 3.1.0 (mac)
Using Locale: en_AU
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
AIR version 14.0
Flash Player version 14.0
Creating temporary directory
Downloading Apache Flex Falcon Co
Hi,
Here's the log - looks like a source forge issue as well.
Version 3.1.0 (mac)
Using Locale: en_AU
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
AIR version 14.0
Flash Player version 14.0
Creating Apache FlexJS home
Creating temporary directory
Downloading Apache FlexJS
from:http://mirror
Hi,
Our workflow on closed and resolved. Note that you can skip the resolved step
altogether and if resolved the close step is optional.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/FLEX/workflows#
Thanks,
Justin
On Oct 7, 2014 6:18 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Did not want to close it without you getting a chance to verify it.
>
> Issue hadn't been resolved so I assumed you wanted me to resolve it.
>
> > Usually fixer resolves the issue, and the reporter closes the issue
>
> Generally not the
Hi,
> Did not want to close it without you getting a chance to verify it.
Issue hadn't been resolved so I assumed you wanted me to resolve it.
> Usually fixer resolves the issue, and the reporter closes the issue
Generally not the case in our bug base, resolved is not used that often, 1596
in
On Oct 7, 2014 6:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Justin, see if you can close the JIRA ticket you opened for this.
>
> Done. BTW Not sure why you are asking me to close it as anyone with the
right JIRA permissions (ie you) could close it.
Did not want to close it without you getting a
Hi,
> Justin, see if you can close the JIRA ticket you opened for this.
Done. BTW Not sure why you are asking me to close it as anyone with the right
JIRA permissions (ie you) could close it.
Justin
Hi,
> I believe I have hacked enough files on our web-site and SourceForge to
> enable 4.13.0 and 4.12.1 (and possibly earlier releases) to install
> correctly.
4.10.0 installs OK (not tested SDK) but 4.9.1 fails to download OSMF. Log
contains:
Downloading osmf.swc from:
http://sourceforge.n
Hi,
> I believe I have hacked enough files on our web-site and SourceForge to
> enable 4.13.0 and 4.12.1 (and possibly earlier releases) to install
> correctly.
4.11.0 is also broken and fails on the font step - no name or password popup
shows.
Log contains:
Downloading afe.jar from: http://f
Hi,
> I believe I have hacked enough files on our web-site and SourceForge to
> enable 4.13.0 and 4.12.1 (and possibly earlier releases) to install
> correctly.
4.13.0 looks ok, 4.12.1 is still asking for name and password when trying too
get afe.jar
Justin
On 10/7/14, 3:35 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>But as most people use it to install it needs to work correctly with a
>new SDK release. Some of the SDK issues (eg osmf issues, missing files in
>Linux) can only be fixed in the installer or hopefully it's config file.
>Currently we're getting 300+
Justin, see if you can close the JIRA ticket you opened for this.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:11 PM, bigosmallm wrote:
> Github user bigosmallm commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities/pull/1#issuecomment-58271561
>
> Thanks, trimedia!
>
>
> --
Github user bigosmallm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities/pull/1#issuecomment-58271561
Thanks, trimedia!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user trimedia closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities/pull/1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Thanks for asking me to check that. Looks like most repos point to master.
This was not the case when we moved to git.
flex-utilities: master
flex-asjs: master
flex-sdk: develop
flex-falcon: master
flex-tlf: master
flex-examples: develop
flex-external: master
I can ask everything to default to de
+1
Is 'develop' the default on the other repos as well?
EdB
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Any objections asking INFRA to make 'develop' the default branch on
> https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities
>
> I recently saw a Pull Request on the master branch. It was
Any objections asking INFRA to make 'develop' the default branch on
https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities
I recently saw a Pull Request on the master branch. It was a simple enough
patch for me to apply on our develop branch. We could avoid confusions
like these by making develop the default
Hi,
The patch has been accepted and committed. Please close the Pull Request
(you have to close it manually)
Thanks for the contribution!
Regards,
Om
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:06 AM, trimedia wrote:
> GitHub user trimedia opened a pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/flex-utilitie
All development ³Nightly² builds are available here:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080
The installer, for example is here:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/InstallApacheFlex/
-Alex
On 10/7/14, 11:42 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>Could you please point me to
Hey all -
I need help with creating a Flex form - that allows the Flex recording tool
to communicate with the back end (php).
Anyone have any time to talk / suggestions?
Thanks for your time!
--
*Bruce L Gardner*
*President, Founder*
512 557 9373
www.spoutsoftware.com
"*If you are a real ma
Hello All,
Could you please point me to the place I can download development builds of
Apache Flex products? particularly "Install Apache Flex 3.2" unreleased
version?
Thanks in advance
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
GitHub user trimedia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities/pull/1
Patch for bug FLEX-34445
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34445
Change line 2285 from
_os.os + abortInfo);
to
_os.os + "&info=" + abortInfo);
You can merge
Hi,
> Isn’t the Installer a separate release from the SDK now?
Yes it's a separate release.
But as most people use it to install it needs to work correctly with a new SDK
release. Some of the SDK issues (eg osmf issues, missing files in Linux) can
only be fixed in the installer or hopefully it'
> Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-34562:
> --
>
>
Installer issues that also also good to fix before making a release (some
> would be required IMO):
> FLEX-34559 FLEX-34540 FLEX-34507 FLEX-34471 FLEX-34452 FLEX-34447
> FLEX-34446 FLEX-34445 FLEX-34425 FLEX-34409
47 matches
Mail list logo
