Re: [FDB] Integration

On 4/29/14 3:30 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >So, is there any objection to have one version in the SDK and one in >Falcon ? I'm ok with that. -Alex

RE: [FDB] Integration

It is possible yes as I did it already but still needs more tests indeed, I still think we can have another version which uses Falcon as the code seems adding more features, I didn't dig that much in it for be able to figure them yet but will try to do it in a near futur. So, is there any objec

RE: [FDB] Integration

Alexander, I found a way to fix them all except the bad message when a file is not found but it is an easy fix I can think about later. You can now select a worker, then you need to halt it if is not, set your breakpoints, watches, displays, continue it if you halted it, this bring you back to

Re: [DRAFT] Announcement: FlexJS and FalconJX 0.0.1 Released!

HI, > It is official in that I can add my vote and send the results. We've only > delayed doing so in case too many folks ran into the locale issue. Which IMO is a serious issue

Re: [FDB] Integration

Yes, definitely. If you can get FDB with workers to not need Falcon classes that would be great. On 4/29/14 10:11 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >If that means users won't be able to debug workers using the SDK until >Falcon has been released as part of it, I don't think that a good idea. > >Inst

Re: AW: AW: FlexUnit 4.3 prepared to be able to do Maven Releases

>From discussion I've seen on other Apache-wide mailing lists, snapshots are somewhat like release candidates or nightly builds. They are not official release and as long as they are not prominently promoted on the users@ list or web site, they are ok. On 4/29/14 9:55 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:

RE: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK 4.12.1 RC2

+1 (Binding) Win7 64 - FR - Java 1.6 Checked MD5 => OK Manual build of SDK from source => OK ( rsls are ok) Tested SDK in FB 4.7 on large desktop Flex app => OK Tested SDK in IDEA 13.1 on small mobile AIR app => OK __ One minor issue in the release notes: FLEX-33948 Add touch behaviour

AW: AW: AW: FlexUnit 4.3 prepared to be able to do Maven Releases

Snapshots have a SNAPSHOT after the version number and they are published to a different repo. So no worries ... will hae a look at the other jenkins :-) -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. April 2014 18:30 An: dev@flex.apache.org B

RE: [FDB] Integration

> Trying to open any file > triggers event at worker side and it halts. By the way that's a problem > as well for the IDE integration: to set breakpoint it needs to suspend > VM which is not possible if no events are fired. I'm not sure you can do > anything with it at fdb side. But I think you

RE: [FDB] Integration

If that means users won't be able to debug workers using the SDK until Falcon has been released as part of it, I don't think that a good idea. Instead, can we have 2 versions ? one using the current ASC classes and shipped with the current SDK, the other one in Falcon ? Frédéric THOMAS > From:

Re: AW: AW: FlexUnit 4.3 prepared to be able to do Maven Releases

Isn't he just making an official release available in a different format/through a different channel? EdB On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > As long as the snapshot is not promoted as a public release, I think you > can go and create it without a vote process. > > On 4/29/1

Re: [FDB] Integration

On 29.04.2014 20:23, Alex Harui wrote: IMO, unless the discussion is going to cover proprietary aspects of IntelliJ, it might be more like the "Apache Way" to share the code in a git branch and continue to discuss on the list. No secrets of course. Ok, continuing here. Frédéric THOMAS wrote:

Re: [FDB] Integration

On 4/29/14 9:35 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >The integration of the worker code itself which requires, in order to be >total, to modify the Ant script that build FDB in order to link the >Falcon sources (AST classes used to evaluate the expression), at the >moment I didn't do this part and the

RE: [FDB] Integration

I meant: I wouldn't like to commit that in this state. Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:35:50 +0100 > > The integration of the worker code itself which requires, in order to be > total, to modi

RE: [FDB] Integration

The integration of the worker code itself which requires, in order to be total, to modify the Ant script that build FDB in order to link the Falcon sources (AST classes used to evaluate the expression), at the moment I didn't do this part and then still use the old code which required some integ

Re: AW: AW: FlexUnit 4.3 prepared to be able to do Maven Releases

As long as the snapshot is not promoted as a public release, I think you can go and create it without a vote process. On 4/29/14 12:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >I just got the confirmation from Infra that the Apache Maven repo is >setup for Flex ... > >What do you guys think about me giving

Re: AW: AW: FlexUnit 4.3 prepared to be able to do Maven Releases

We've given up on builds.a.o. All flex builds are now here: http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080 On 4/29/14 12:50 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >That's a little tricky, >I seem to be unable to open Jenkins ... all I get are some strange proxy >errors ... > >This was the content of the mail

Re: [FDB] Integration

IMO, unless the discussion is going to cover proprietary aspects of IntelliJ, it might be more like the "Apache Way" to share the code in a git branch and continue to discuss on the list. On 4/29/14 8:03 AM, "Alexander Doroshko" wrote: >Yes, I'd gladly try it. We can switch to personal emails in

RE: [FDB] Integration

Done !! :-) Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:03:39 +0400 > From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > > Yes, I'd gladly try it. We can switch to personal emails in order not to > spam the list. > > On 29.04.2014 18:34,

Re: [FDB] Integration

Yes, I'd gladly try it. We can switch to personal emails in order not to spam the list. On 29.04.2014 18:34, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: Hi Alexander, I downloaded the files you indicated me + some missing files (UI, ShineMP3, metallica.wav), created an IntelliJ project, build and run successfully

RE: [FDB] Integration

Hi Alexander, I downloaded the files you indicated me + some missing files (UI, ShineMP3, metallica.wav), created an IntelliJ project, build and run successfully the application with Apache Flex SDK 4.12 / AIR 4.0 + my version of FDB and was unable to reproduce both of the issues, it worked as

Re: [FDB] Integration

Hi Frédéric, that's great that you are ready to put the effort into fdb with workers support! I have to say that IntelliJ IDEA still doesn't support debugging apps with workers. I spent some time on it but faced some bugs in fdb that were not that easy to workaround. That's not an excuse for

AW: AW: FlexUnit 4.3 prepared to be able to do Maven Releases

I just got the confirmation from Infra that the Apache Maven repo is setup for Flex ... What do you guys think about me giving FlexUnit 4.3 a snapshot release? 4.3-SNAPSHOT? I guess SNAPSHOTS don't need the voting thing, do they? Chris Von: Alex Harui

AW: AW: FlexUnit 4.3 prepared to be able to do Maven Releases

That's a little tricky, I seem to be unable to open Jenkins ... all I get are some strange proxy errors ... This was the content of the mail I got ... I think the last line is the interesting one ... but I couln't have a look at it, as I seem to be unable to visit Jenkins: See