Yes, definitely. If you can get FDB with workers to not need Falcon classes that would be great.
On 4/29/14 10:11 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >If that means users won't be able to debug workers using the SDK until >Falcon has been released as part of it, I don't think that a good idea. > >Instead, can we have 2 versions ? one using the current ASC classes and >shipped with the current SDK, the other one in Falcon ? > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> From: aha...@adobe.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration >> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:41:33 +0000 >> >> >> >> On 4/29/14 9:35 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >The integration of the worker code itself which requires, in order to >>be >> >total, to modify the Ant script that build FDB in order to link the >> >Falcon sources (AST classes used to evaluate the expression), at the >> >moment I didn't do this part and then still use the old code which >> >required some integration code to work, I would like to commit that but >> >once the build script modified and everything is working, I will >>commit. >> >Is it fine for you like that ? >> You can check anything you want into the FDBWorkers branch, but IMO, FDB >> should not be using Falcon classes when we check it into the main >>branch. >> An alternate plan would be to make FDB with workers only available as >>part >> of Falcon and move it to that repo. >> -ALex >> >
