Re: [LAZY] Updating Installer to point to FP 12 and AIR 4

2014-01-16 Thread Alex Harui
Fine with me if all it takes is updating the config.xml. FWIW, I am working on a newer version of that file. It is in the repo as sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml. I'll take care of adding the Air4FP12 to it. It is reformatted so we can read it into the ant scripts -Alex On 1/16/14 12:18 PM, "OmPr

[LAZY] Updating Installer to point to FP 12 and AIR 4

2014-01-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
If I remember correct, Erik's VM has had Mustella runs agains FP 12 and AIR 4 betas. FP 12/4 was released yesterday. I was planning on updating the Installer to point to the new versions and make them the default. Any objections? Thanks, Om

Mustella VM setup update

2014-01-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Thanks Fred :-) I had emailed earlier about my intentions of setting up a farm of Windows Azure VMs that run Mustella. Also, at some point I will be trying to split up the tests among VMs so that we can have a single Mustella run run parallely on multiple VMs. The VM I created at bigosmallm.clou

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Alex, Actually, I moved the fixed jar onto the parent jira [1], Alexander attached it his original code and that's the current state of the attached files, so, it should be all what we need. (Sorry for the confusion because I did it in the same time but removed the extra file right after I've s

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Alex Harui
Well, we need Alexander to attach it so it records it as a donation from them. It is optional whether to put your changes in the JIRA. Folks might prefer the jar over having the sources, but up to you. Thanks to both of you, -Alex On 1/16/14 6:28 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >Yeah

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Moved ! Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:31:59 +0400 > From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ? > > > Alexander, can you attach the FDB patches you gave to Fred to one of the > > JIRA issues? That way we can have a

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Alexander Doroshko
Alexander, can you attach the FDB patches you gave to Fred to one of the JIRA issues? That way we can have a consistent way of tracking your permission to use those patches. Sure, attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34042

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi Alex, Yeah, I'm happy too, to be able to set breakpoints in runtime loaded modules now. I should have attached the idea fix sources, will do it right now and move the fixed fdb.jar to the parent issue as it should, in case users want to test / use it before the release. Thanks, Frédéric TH

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Alexander Doroshko
Btw, does it means the idea-fdb-fix will contains only the StringUtil / ExpressionCache fixes now ? Yes I didn't integrated this fix because you told me it is more an IDE thing and I didn't look at it closely, what impact it would be to integrate it and using FDB standalone ? The fix escape

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Alex Harui
Yay Fred! Great job! Alexander, can you attach the FDB patches you gave to Fred to one of the JIRA issues? That way we can have a consistent way of tracking your permission to use those patches. Thanks, -Alex On 1/16/14 6:11 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >No problemo, especially because most

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
No problemo, especially because most of those fixes came from you, so, many thanks to you :-) Btw, does it means the idea-fdb-fix will contains only the StringUtil / ExpressionCache fixes now ? I didn't integrated this fix because you told me it is more an IDE thing and I didn't look at it clos

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Alexander Doroshko
Checked in the repo - ok for me, thank you for these fixes! The problem with ANEs is not stable and depends on the Moon phase. Test case was simple - any app with any ANE. I don't remember which one I used when was working on the issue. But since you took my code that was tested at the moment

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
It is commited already, from the tests I did, it is ok, wanted you to check as well, especially for ANE, I've got no test cases for that, Btw, if you have, can you share your test cases with me ? it would be great. Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:36:02 +0400 > From: alexande

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Alexander Doroshko
Looks good! May I take a look at the final DebugCLI.java source code? Hi Alexander, Just attached the fixed fdb.jar for test in the JIRA parent [1] with all your changes except the 1st one + the current fixed issue, can you check it works with all the test cases you have. Thanks, Frédéric THO

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Oups, the file is here [1] in the subtask [2] Frédéric THOMAS [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12623373/fdb.jar [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-26768 > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: FDB vs FB debugging ? > Date: Thu, 16

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi Alexander, Just attached the fixed fdb.jar for test in the JIRA parent [1] with all your changes except the 1st one + the current fixed issue, can you check it works with all the test cases you have. Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34042 > Date: Wed,

RE: RE : RE : FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-16 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hey Alex, We've got it, that was exactly what we thought, so the catch on InProgressException at function level was preventing other searches in already loaded modules, I simply enclosed the calls to findAndEnableBreak() with a catch on InProgressException and let the function search into the o