Re: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 469 - Still Failing!

2014-01-15 Thread Alex Harui
I get a login screen, and the credentials I got off of private@ don't seem to work. Is there different credentials for it? On 1/15/14 11:39 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >Is this what you're looking for: > >http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella-mobile/ws > >EdB > > > >On Thu, Jan

Re: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 469 - Still Failing!

2014-01-15 Thread Erik de Bruin
Is this what you're looking for: http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella-mobile/ws EdB On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Looked at the full log. The tail of this log is misleading; the first > mustella run failed so badly that the failures computation broke

Re: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 469 - Still Failing!

2014-01-15 Thread Alex Harui
Looked at the full log. The tail of this log is misleading; the first mustella run failed so badly that the failures computation broke! Every SWF timed out like this: [java] C:\jenkins_slave\workspace\flex-sdk_mustella-mobile\mustella\tests\mobile\C SSMediaQueries\swfs\ClassSelectorApp.xml Fail

Re: Apache Flex Examples Proposal

2014-01-15 Thread Joseph Balderson
Shane from Apache Brand Management contacted me on Monday, their lawyers are looking into making this happen. Thanks for your help Alex! ___ Joseph Balderson, Flex & Flash Platform Developer :: http://joeflash.ca Author, Professi

RE: RE : RE : FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
I'm debugging it right now with the IntelliJ project Alexander shared and I'm at almost the same conclusion, will check that deeper tomorrow as I'll be able to try it on my company project where the bug appears. I guess the exception thrown is a NPE which is catch later in doBreak() though. I

Re: RE : RE : FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Alex Harui
The patch for FLEX-26768 (which was Adobe's SDK-29513) appears to be corrupted. In looking at the FDB code and the notes in FLEX-26768, I would guess that the patch changed code in enableBreak(). There is a loop through all known SWFs and an exception in the loop prevents other SWFs from being se

Re: SDK Build

2014-01-15 Thread Lee Burrows
Velocity was the problem for me too - i never found a solution ;( On 15/01/2014 19:19, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: With 1.6.45 64bits, BUILD SUCCESSFUL Is there something in particular to do to build it with JDK 1.7 ? Frédéric THOMAS From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject:

Re: SDK Build

2014-01-15 Thread Alex Harui
There is a note in the README about Ant version and Java 1.7. Does it apply to you? On 1/15/14 11:19 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >With 1.6.45 64bits, BUILD SUCCESSFUL > >Is there something in particular to do to build it with JDK 1.7 ? > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> T

RE: SDK Build

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
With 1.6.45 64bits, BUILD SUCCESSFUL Is there something in particular to do to build it with JDK 1.7 ? Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: SDK Build > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:28:55 + > > Oups, haven't seen the archive page, I give a try

Re: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 469 - Still Failing!

2014-01-15 Thread Alex Harui
OK. Didn't know that. How do we determine which tests to run in the mobile run? It looks like it is trying to run non-mobile tests that depend on MX components which aren't in a mobile config. -Alex On 1/15/14 9:59 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> Yeah, but I was wondering if the main build scr

RE: SDK Build

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Oups, haven't seen the archive page, I give a try Frédéric THOMAS From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: RE: SDK Build Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:25:56 + Yes, it is what I wanted to try and it is the one I was using before but when I tried to download it from the O

RE: SDK Build

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Yes, it is what I wanted to try and it is the one I was using before but when I tried to download it from the Oracle, I wasn't able to find it, they said it wasn't available for download any more. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk-6u32-downloads-1594644.html Thanks, Fr

Re: SDK Build

2014-01-15 Thread Lee Burrows
Could be worth a try with JDK1.6 - i always get errors trying to build with 1.7, but 1.6 doesnt complain. On 15/01/2014 18:07, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: What error did you get when downloading the pixel bender zip? I'm not in the office any more but so I will be able to say tomorrow only but I c

RE: SDK Build

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
> What error did you get when downloading the pixel bender zip? I'm not in the office any more but so I will be able to say tomorrow only but I can't remember a specific error. > What version of Java are you running? An exception has occurred in the compiler (1.7.0_40). I copied the log in the p

Re: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 469 - Still Failing!

2014-01-15 Thread Erik de Bruin
> Yeah, but I was wondering if the main build screwed up and the mobile run > is showing problems because it is downstream. Nope. Unlike the builds @ apache, the Mustella jobs are not dependent upon one another. They run in their own workspace. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat

Re: SDK Build

2014-01-15 Thread Alex Harui
What error did you get when downloading the pixel bender zip? What version of Java are you running? On 1/15/14 8:05 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >erratum ,I meant: instead of the ${download.dir}/${pixelbender.bin.zip} > >To check if it has been downloaded already. > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> From:

RE: SDK Build

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
erratum ,I meant: instead of the ${download.dir}/${pixelbender.bin.zip} To check if it has been downloaded already. Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: SDK Build > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:00:30 + > > Hi all, > > Was trying to build the SD

SDK Build

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi all, Was trying to build the SDK (long time I didn't have to do it, don't know for you): 1- It tries to downlaod a particular version of pixelbender [1] but fails: In my case it wasn't able to download it, so, I downloaded it manually and put it into the "in" folder but still, because the

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Alexander Doroshko
I have a case (without AS workers) where FDB from Apache Flex SDK doesn't work, but form Adobe AIR SDK works: http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-116629 On 15.01.2014 16:58, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: The need is only about the ability to debug Workers IMO which is still a important requeste

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
The need is only about the ability to debug Workers IMO which is still a important requested feature but let's see. Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:25:53 +0400 > From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ? > > That would be c

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Alexander Doroshko
That would be cool! FB doesn't use DebugCLI class (it is pure command-line specific high level wrapper), so it is safe. By the way Alex said that updated FDB from Adobe AIR SDK will be finally donated soon and will be incorporated into Apache repo. We'll need to check the need and applicabilit

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Will try to merge and check that doesn't break anything in FB too. Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:53:58 +0400 > From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ? > > > Btw, while you here, can you tell me what C:\Program F

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Alexander Doroshko
Is it in your plan to add RSL support into IntelliJ ? I mean extract the swf from the swc to a user location and compute digest as does the RSLMojoCreator class from flexmojos. This lack of feature force us to build via maven only or to have a profile where everything is merged into memory exte

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Alexander Doroshko
Btw, while you here, can you tell me what C:\Program Files (x86)\JetBrains\IntelliJ IDEA 13.0\plugins\flex\lib\idea-fdb-4.5.0.20967-fix.jar is for? Source code for my patch can be found in [IntelliJ IDEA Installation]/plugins/flex/lib/idea-fdb-4.5.0.20967-fix_src.zip. It solves some issues: 1

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
"in my understanding FB uses the same low-level (protocol) code as FDB, but a bit different high-level wrapper. Since FB is not open-sourced I don't know what is the difference." Yeah, probably the reason why it doesn't take the "-include-file" compiler arguments into account which sucks :) Eve

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi Alexander, Will build the SDK this afternoon on my office computer (not a thing I wanted to do as I haven't any allocated time for that) and will try to use your uploaded project, thanks a lot. Btw, while you here, can you tell me what C:\Program Files (x86)\JetBrains\IntelliJ IDEA 13.0\pl

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Alexander Doroshko
Hi, in my understanding FB uses the same low-level (protocol) code as FDB, but a bit different high-level wrapper. Since FB is not open-sourced I don't know what is the difference. I recommend you to try using FDB from Adobe AIR SDK bundle that includes ASC 2.0. FDB tool bundled there is very

RE: RE : RE : FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi Avi, I use the same application domain and the code is merged into memory but I tried anyway thru remote debug session without luck (I would have liked it worked). Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 23:06:04 +0200 > Subject: Re: RE : RE : FDB vs FB debugging ? > From: akess...

RE: RE : RE : FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Thanks Alex, that could be a way of investigation, will try to debug FDB, never did it before you if you know how I should do that, you help would be appreciated. References I found relative to this issue : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-28870 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/