> Do we really need to make that distinction? It would be better if we
> dont too many restrictions on apps we want to showcase.
Maybe when we have a few dozen entries, we can start being restrictive ;-)
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
>Well, re-read the end of that thread and let me know where you stand.
Alex wrote:
"Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and simply add
new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be simpler and gives us
the option of reverting back to a single package if we
If you run that test locally does it fail to compile? I just tried it and
it failed on that char.
It occurs to me that I think in an full run some compilation errors are
missed and don't fail the run. We might have just been lucky.
-ALex
On 12/17/13 11:08 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I wonder if you've picked up a newer and more sensitive SAX parser?
>
Very likely. How can I confirm?
Should we be worried about what kind of problems that this kind of a
difference could cause?
>
> On 12/17/13 7:00 PM, "OmPrakash Muppiral
On 12/17/13 9:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> No, I'm using OSX. What error did you get?
>Unable to copy the README.pb file. Has that actually been checked in?
Hah! That might help. But I think you're trying to running the
release-pixelbender target which I was thinking would be on t
Hi,
> No, I'm using OSX. What error did you get?
Unable to copy the README.pb file. Has that actually been checked in?
Justin
Hi,
> Do we really need to make that distinction? It would be better if we dont
> too many restrictions on apps we want to showcase.
There's at least one there I know that's not using Apache Flex - hopefully
being there will be incentive to upgrade.
Thanks,
Justin
On 12/17/13 5:33 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> The steps to build is in there already (build-pixelbender target).
>Which currently doesn't work (for me anyway). Perhaps it's an OSX issue?
No, I'm using OSX. What error did you get?
-Alex
I wonder if you've picked up a newer and more sensitive SAX parser?
On 12/17/13 7:00 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>http://bigosmallm.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_mustella/45/
>
>
>[java] Loading configuration file C:\jenkins_slave\workspace\
>flex-sdk_mustella\frameworks\flex-config.xml
>
>
> Plus, we want the Apache Flex
>
showcase to showcase applications that have moved to Apache Flex.
>
>
Do we really need to make that distinction? It would be better if we dont
too many restrictions on apps we want to showcase.
Thanks,
Om
> -Alex
>
> On 12/17/13 7:40 PM, "Patel Amit" wrote
Not without a lot of work. We would need permission from those folks in
that showcase and permission from Adobe. Plus, we want the Apache Flex
showcase to showcase applications that have moved to Apache Flex.
-Alex
On 12/17/13 7:40 PM, "Patel Amit" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Could we embed the same old f
Hi,
Could we embed the same old flex showcase here as with the adobe previously
Amit
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I took a quick glance. Looks fine.
>
> On 12/17/13 6:23 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
> wrote:
>
> >"silence gives consent" ;-)
> >
> >Should I go ahead and pu
http://bigosmallm.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_mustella/45/
[java] Loading configuration file C:\jenkins_slave\workspace\
flex-sdk_mustella\frameworks\flex-config.xml
[java]
C:\jenkins_slave\workspace\flex-sdk_mustella\mustella\tests\Printing\SWFs\FlexPrintJob_Basic.mxml(41):
col: 1 Error:
Hi,
> The steps to build is in there already (build-pixelbender target).
Which currently doesn't work (for me anyway). Perhaps it's an OSX issue?
> Flex-utilities may have more than one thing coming out of it someday.
Sure but each "sub project" has it's own directory so it far easier to know
wh
On 12/17/13 4:36 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> but there is no steps for working from the source kit per-se as you
>>pointed out.
>Which is required for a valid release. Although in this case it's a
>little unusual as it not aimed at users, there not much you can do with a
>pixel bender
Hi,
> but there is no steps for working from the source kit per-se as you pointed
> out.
Which is required for a valid release. Although in this case it's a little
unusual as it not aimed at users, there not much you can do with a pixel bender
release on it own.
> I think we can. The main SDK
On 12/17/13 3:19 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> OK. Good point about the overlay of the notice files. I'll add an ant
>> target to copy just the pbk/pbj.
>That would be required for the CI anyway wouldn't it?
The downloads.xml does the right thing (downloads the -bin.zip, only
copies ou
On 12/17/13 3:35 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>> The goal was to not move the PBK files out to a different repo and
>> instead, package a subset of the flex-sdk repo.
>
>Why can't it be on a different repo ?
It can.
>From our early discussion on the subject (see email thread "PixelBender
>and
> The goal was to not move the PBK files out to a different repo and
> instead, package a subset of the flex-sdk repo.
Why can't it be on a different repo ?
>From our early discussion on the subject (see email thread "PixelBender and
>Builds.a.o"), I understood that PBK sources were moved to
Hi,
> OK. Good point about the overlay of the notice files. I'll add an ant
> target to copy just the pbk/pbj.
That would be required for the CI anyway wouldn't it?
> The goal was to not move the PBK files out to a different repo and
> instead, package a subset of the flex-sdk repo.
Can we actu
OK. Good point about the overlay of the notice files. I'll add an ant
target to copy just the pbk/pbj.
The goal was to not move the PBK files out to a different repo and
instead, package a subset of the flex-sdk repo. Do you think everything
on this list is required? IOW:
1) can we tell folks
Hi,
Tested on OSX, there still a few things that need a little work IMO - see below.
- MD5 and sigs all good (even though sig used is not in web of trust)
gpg: Signature made Wed 18 Dec 04:28:17 2013 EST using RSA key ID DA9CCFF2
gpg: Good signature from "Alex Harui (CODE SIGNING KEY) "
gpg: WARN
Way to go!
The next thing Erik or I have to figure out is the build script and
compiler changes so that certain AS files get cross-compiled to JS without
overwriting the hand-written JS files. Erik, any thoughts on how tricky
that will be?
-Alex
On 12/17/13 12:49 PM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>Hi,
>
Hi,
I've added a simple BarChart component to the ActionScript FlexJS SDK; it is
modeled on the MX Charts package. I also included an example of using it,
located in the FlexJS examples directory.
I developed the BarChart in ActionScript but it can be cross-compiled into
JavaScript and produce
I took a quick glance. Looks fine.
On 12/17/13 6:23 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>"silence gives consent" ;-)
>
>Should I go ahead and publish , and wait some more?
>
>http://flex.staging.apache.org/community-showcase.html
>
>Maurice
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Maurice Amsellem [mailt
My new key is in the KEYS file (in the folder above the rc) so you will
need to import it to verify the signature.
On 12/17/13 9:46 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Please use this thread for discussion.
>
>Thanks,
>-Alex
>
Hey guys!
Wanted to say thank you so much for such great ideas for what you'd like to
see at 360|Flex 2014! We're fleshing out the schedule now, you can see what
we've so far at http://www.360flex.com/#schedule
We're still working on some of the lab slots, so if there's something you'd
like to ha
Please vote to approve Apache Flex PixelBender Package version 1.0.0 to be
released.
As a reminder, the PixelBender package is a subset of the flex-sdk repo
containing the PixelBender source files and a build script to compile them
into PixelBender PBJ files. This package will probably not be use
Please use this thread for discussion.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 12/16/13 11:36 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Please vote to approve Apache Flex PixelBender Package version 1.0.0 to be
>released.
>
>As a reminder, the PixelBender package is a subset of the flex-sdk repo
>containing the PixelBender source files and a build script to compile them
>into PixelBend
Yes multiple version of Java SDK can be installed at the same time. However if
you have an environmental variable, It can only be pointed to one version at a
time.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:55 AM
To: d
Crud. Will fix, and therefore supply a custom read me as Tom suggested.
On 12/17/13 6:28 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>In the README, it still says:
>
>" No Pixel Bender Toolkit for Linux exists but the compiled Pixel Bender
>files
> can be downloaded from:
>
>https://buil
I downloaded the sources and tried to compile the pixel_bender package release,
as stated in the ASF guidelines.
- However, it's not clear from the README how it should be compiled and what
target needs to be called in the build.xml?
( I supposed it's " release-pixelbender" but this should be
Looks good now, thanks.
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Maurice Amsellem <
maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:
> It looks ok on my side.
> Can you try again now ?
>
> Maurice
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
> Envoyé : mardi 17 décemb
You can have multiple different JDK versions at once can't you ? Even on
Windows ?
I didn't think we were suggesting not having a GUI installer for the
SDK, just that under the hood it would call an ant task ?
Tom
On 17/12/2013 14:46, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
Sure, having Java installed
It looks ok on my side.
Can you try again now ?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Envoyé : mardi 17 décembre 2013 15:48
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex showcase
It looks like when you published, you may have missed the changes to
Hi Shivang,
The Flex show case is now live.
However, we don't have enough information to include your app.
Please read submission instructions below:
http://flex.apache.org/community-showcase.html
PS: I already created the jira ticket for you, so you can fill in the requested
information:
http
It looks like when you published, you may have missed the changes to the
CSS file.
Make sure you go into the CMS page, click on [UPDATE] in the root of our
site and then publish. I bet it didn't know those files changed.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Maurice Amsellem <
maurice.amsel...@systa
Sure, having Java installed is pretty standard now-a-days, but the bigger
question is -- which Java? My development machine at work is locked to the
1.5 JDK as the default because they use some crazy Oracle Forms app. This
is the same with the other 25 developers in my division.
This means insta
Showcase is now in production site:
http://flex.apache.org/
thanks for your feedback.
Should we make a "call for app submission" ?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : mardi 17 décembre 2013 15:32
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Obje
Thanks, will do.
-Message d'origine-
De : Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Envoyé : mardi 17 décembre 2013 15:31
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex showcase
It looks good. My only suggestion would be to capitalize each of the bullet
points in the "Want to see your
It looks good. My only suggestion would be to capitalize each of the
bullet points in the "Want to see your app showcased here" section to be
consistent with the rest of our site. Also, remove the errant commas at
the end of some of the bullets.
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Maurice A
Thanks, noticed it too.
Will be fixed.
-Message d'origine-
De : Mark Saunders [mailto:msaund...@bigredflame.com]
Envoyé : mardi 17 décembre 2013 15:28
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Flex showcase
Looks good. 1 minor typo:
Under " bCommunities - Secure B2B Collaboration"
" powerful
In the README, it still says:
" No Pixel Bender Toolkit for Linux exists but the compiled Pixel Bender files
can be downloaded from:
https://builds.apache.org/pview/job/flex-sdk_pixelbender/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/pb.tar.gz";
I thought that flex_sdk_pixelbender ups
Looks good. 1 minor typo:
Under " bCommunities - Secure B2B Collaboration"
" powerfullyand"
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:23 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: Flex showcase
"silence gives consent"
"silence gives consent" ;-)
Should I go ahead and publish , and wait some more?
http://flex.staging.apache.org/community-showcase.html
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : mardi 17 décembre 2013 02:13
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Ob
On 12/17/13 3:10 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>The README only talks about Apache Flex, I think it should probably be
>rewriten for PixelBender ?
>
>Minor thing though...
I considered that. Let's see if others agree.
-Alex
I think too late. I copied the revoked key to the MIT server. But I
couldn't figure out how to just revoke the sub key so maybe it will just
be less hassle to start over with a new key :-(
On 12/17/13 2:55 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>On 17/12/2013 07:14, Alex Harui wrote:
>> revoke the sub key
I checked in an ant script for flex-falcon. The proposed pattern is to
put it all in an installer.xml file. It presumes you have expanded the
binary kit and am running ant -f installer.xml in that expanded kit. It
will download and copy stuff into that same folder. I guess maybe we
should add a
The README only talks about Apache Flex, I think it should probably be
rewriten for PixelBender ?
Minor thing though...
Tom
On 16/12/2013 20:24, Alex Harui wrote:
On 12/16/13 11:14 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
On Linux, we can probably assume that Ant is already installed, or just a
'yum install' away from being available. That way, they can just use the
ant script just as well.
Interesting. Tom, do you agre
On 17/12/2013 07:14, Alex Harui wrote:
revoke the sub key and ended up revoking both the sub key and primary key.
Might be too late now, but as long as you didn't publish the revoke you
can just restore a previous version of the .gpg folder.
Tom
52 matches
Mail list logo
