Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #20

2013-07-01 Thread Alex Harui
Erik, I don't know how to use any of the editors on the VM that support unix line endings, but the jenkins.sh for mobile has an error where it isn't setting target_os_name in local.properties, but rather "arget_os_name". I still got about 20 failures that I'm looking at, but fixing jenkins.sh sho

Re: Are we "nerd" driven or "business realistic" driven?

2013-07-01 Thread Alex Harui
On 7/1/13 10:15 AM, "Avi Kessner" wrote: >Why can't we get rid of those 13k line base classes? >On 1 Jul 2013 20:03, "Jonathan Campos" wrote: We can, but not without breaking backward compatibility or slower performance. In the two attempts I made, you can break UIComponent into some 20 sub-c

Re: Mustella Tests are failing.

2013-07-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, BTW the mustella tests passed after this was fixed. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-24257 So it must be related to a change made after that but not sure what as there need no changes to DateField.as since that change - there been changed made to mustella in that time could they b

Re: Issue with flex wiki?

2013-07-01 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
BTW, this seems to be working: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX Om On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:23 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I saw something about a Confluence update over the weekend. I am guessing > they are in the middle of it now. > > Thanks, > Om > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 201

Re: Issue with flex wiki?

2013-07-01 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I saw something about a Confluence update over the weekend. I am guessing they are in the middle of it now. Thanks, Om On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Just me or is this slightly broken? > > https://cwiki.apache.org/FLEX/ > > Justin >

Issue with flex wiki?

2013-07-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Just me or is this slightly broken? https://cwiki.apache.org/FLEX/ Justin

Re: Mustella Tests are failing.

2013-07-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Looks like most of the failures are related to a different default size of > DateField. The existing 4.6/4.8/4.9 DateField had an issue where is was miscalculating the width, it mostly showed up in other locates but also was issue in en_US when editing text the text scrolled. https://issu

Re: Flex mobile performance

2013-07-01 Thread Jeffry Houser
On 7/1/2013 1:15 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jonathan Campos wrote: On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:43 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: So, when folks are saying that Flex does not perform well on mobile, can you please post some examples, etc so we can try to figu

Re: Flex mobile performance

2013-07-01 Thread Jonathan Campos
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:15 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Is there something we can do about this in terms of coding/compiler > warnings etc. ? Or perhaps have a Flex PMD rule for this? > I think there are plenty of articles out there telling developers how to get good performance and to wri

Re: Flex mobile performance

2013-07-01 Thread Madhu Dutta
Another thing is,in flex there is no such thing to export vector pdf from exact display with respective matrix and position.. On Jul 1, 2013 10:46 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jonathan Campos >wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:43 PM, OmPrakash Muppiral

Flex mobile performance

2013-07-01 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jonathan Campos wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:43 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > wrote: > > > So, when folks are saying that Flex does not perform well on mobile, can > > you please post some examples, etc so we can try to figure out what the > > real problems? As

Re: Are we "nerd" driven or "business realistic" driven?

2013-07-01 Thread Avi Kessner
Why can't we get rid of those 13k line base classes? On 1 Jul 2013 20:03, "Jonathan Campos" wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:43 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > wrote: > > > So, when folks are saying that Flex does not perform well on mobile, can > > you please post some examples, etc so we can try to

Re: bug with captive runtime?

2013-07-01 Thread Frank Dahmen
everything ok now, it was my fault sorry - Original Message - From: "Alex Harui" To: Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 6:20 PM Subject: Re: bug with captive runtime? Hi Frank, were you using captive runtime with Adobe sdk? If not, can you try it? On 7/1/13 8:49 AM, "Frank Dahmen" w

Re: Are we "nerd" driven or "business realistic" driven?

2013-07-01 Thread Jonathan Campos
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:43 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > So, when folks are saying that Flex does not perform well on mobile, can > you please post some examples, etc so we can try to figure out what the > real problems? As opposed to sweeping statements like Flex mobile sucks, > etc. > Jus

Re: bug with captive runtime?

2013-07-01 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Frank, were you using captive runtime with Adobe sdk? If not, can you try it? On 7/1/13 8:49 AM, "Frank Dahmen" wrote: >Hi, > >after migrating from the adobe to the apache sdk there is a problem with >the >services-config.xml in my mobile air project. >I get this runtime error: > >faultCode

bug with captive runtime?

2013-07-01 Thread Frank Dahmen
Hi, after migrating from the adobe to the apache sdk there is a problem with the services-config.xml in my mobile air project. I get this runtime error: faultCode:InvokeFailed faultString:'[MessagingError message='Destination 'zend' either does not exist or the destination has no channels def

RE: Mustella Tests are failing.

2013-07-01 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
Is it all in the Font or can a skin/css address it back? I'm all for keeping the changes if it looks better, but would be nice if we could explain how to make it look like the old look. -Mark -Original Message- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 11

Re: Mustella Tests are failing.

2013-07-01 Thread Alex Harui
Looks like most of the failures are related to a different default size of DateField. It doesn't look bad, might even look better (less whitespace padding) but could annoy folks when upgrading. What do folks want to do? Cut new baselines and risk annoying folks or muck with DateField until it ret

Re: Mustella VM up and running

2013-07-01 Thread Erik de Bruin
Thanks, I'll stay out of the VM during my afternoon and evening, unless I've notified the list. EdB On Monday, July 1, 2013, Alex Harui wrote: > I will poke at it this week, generally around this time and towards my > evening, some 14 hours later. > > -Alex > > On 7/1/13 4:09 AM, "Erik de Brui

Re: Mustella VM up and running

2013-07-01 Thread Alex Harui
I will poke at it this week, generally around this time and towards my evening, some 14 hours later. -Alex On 7/1/13 4:09 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >Hi, > >The Mustella VM is now up and running. I had to make some changes in >the last couple of days to get all three major suites to run >consec

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #198

2013-07-01 Thread Alex Harui
Looks like I'm still using 11.1. Probably because that was the latest we had when we started the donations. Let's get to zero failures on 11.1 before trying 11.2. But I think someone tried 11.3 and there were more bitmap failures, so I would expect a jump to 11.7 to be messy. -Alex On 7/1/13 2

MVC libs in the Apache Flex codebase (was: Are we "nerd" driven or "business realistic" driven?)

2013-07-01 Thread Sebastian Mohr
Thanks Alex, I pretty much think the same way as you, and I believe that Parsley should be hosted in our codebase for some time to give the Parsley community the impression of stability for them. Since the release of the Cairngorm 3 spec [1] and the Cairngorm 3 libraries with Parsley support [2],

Mustella VM up and running

2013-07-01 Thread Erik de Bruin
Hi, The Mustella VM is now up and running. I had to make some changes in the last couple of days to get all three major suites to run consecutively. Turns out that the Jenkins slave can have only one executor - or the system/Java will barf - and that the three suites take more than 12 hours to com

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #198

2013-07-01 Thread Erik de Bruin
I'll let Alex answer that, as he claims to have a local Windows machine that once upon a time ran the main Mustella suite without failures... EdB On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > >> "+1 for 11.1 and 11.7 from me but other people may think differently." > Ah perhaps

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #198

2013-07-01 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > "+1 for 11.1 and 11.7 from me but other people may think differently." Ah perhaps I got that wrong but I think it 11.2 the version the tests were last tested with? And that might explain the number of failures? Thanks, Justin

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #198

2013-07-01 Thread Erik de Bruin
Well, one of the reasons is your own "vote" from 2 weeks ago: "+1 for 11.1 and 11.7 from me but other people may think differently." ;-) We can easily switch if needed, so maybe this is worth a real DISCUSSION/VOTE so we can have a clear decision? EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstr

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #198

2013-07-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > [java] C:\Program Files > (x86)\flashplayer11_1r102_55_win_sa_debug_32bit.exe Any reason we're using Flash Player 11.1 here? I thought 11.2 was the baseline? Justin