On (02/02/24 11:21), Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 11:21:59 +0100
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> To: Rahul Gupta
> Cc: David Marchand , dev@dpdk.org,
> bruce.richard...@intel.com, dmitry.kozl...@gmail.com,
> step...@networkplumber.org, sovar...@linux.mi
On (02/03/24 04:57), Rahul Gupta wrote:
> Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 04:57:49 -0800
> From: Rahul Gupta
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: David Marchand , dev@dpdk.org,
> bruce.richard...@intel.com, dmitry.kozl...@gmail.com,
> step...@networkplumber.org, sovar...@linux.microsoft.com,
&
From: Rahul Gupta
In continuation to the following email, I am sending this patch.
https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20231110172523.ga17...@microsoft.com/
(Apologies for delay in sending the patch)
Initialization requires rte_eal_init + rte_pktmbuf_pool_create which
can consume a total time of 500-600
From: Rahul Gupta
In continuation to the following email, I am sending this patch.
(https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20231110172523.ga17...@microsoft.com/)
Initialization requires rte_eal_init + rte_pktmbuf_pool_create which
can consume a total time of 500-600 ms:
a) For many devices FLR may take a
From: Rahul Gupta
In continuation to the following email, I am sending this patch.
(https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20231110172523.ga17...@microsoft.com/)
Initialization requires rte_eal_init + rte_pktmbuf_pool_create which
can consume a total time of 500-600 ms:
a) For many devices FLR may take a
From: Rahul Gupta
In continuation to the following email, I am sending this patch.
(https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20231110172523.ga17...@microsoft.com/)
Initialization requires rte_eal_init + rte_pktmbuf_pool_create which
can consume a total time of 500-600 ms:
a) For many devices FLR may take a
On (01/24/24 16:53), David Marchand wrote:
> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:53:33 +0100
> From: David Marchand
> To: Rahul Gupta
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, tho...@monjalon.net, bruce.richard...@intel.com,
> dmitry.kozl...@gmail.com, step...@networkplumber.org,
> sovar...@linux
From: Rahul Gupta
Initialization often requires rte_eal_init + rte_pktmbuf_pool_create
which can consume a total time of 500-600 ms:
a) For many devices FLR may take a significant chunk of time
(200-250 ms in our use-case), this FLR is triggered during device
probe in rte_eal_init().
b
On (11/02/23 11:37), Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:37:59 -0700
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> To: Rahul Gupta
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, tho...@monjalon.net, sovar...@linux.microsoft.com,
> ok...@kernel.org, sujithsan...@microsoft.com,
> sowmini.varad...@microso
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for your review.
If I make it __rte_internal then, testpmd or our application can't use it.
So instead I am planning to make it __rte_experimental.
Regards,
Rahul.
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 00:08, Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:19:24 -0700
>
On (11/08/23 16:40), Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 16:40:07 +0100
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> To: rahul gupta , Dmitry Kozlyuk
>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Rahul Gupta
> , dev@dpdk.org,
> sovar...@linux.microsoft.com, ok...@kernel.org,
> su
On (11/09/23 17:32), Bruce Richardson wrote:
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:32:31 +
> From: Bruce Richardson
> To: Rahul Gupta
> CC: Thomas Monjalon , rahul gupta
> , Dmitry Kozlyuk ,
> Stephen Hemminger , dev@dpdk.org,
> sovar...@linux.microsoft.com, ok...@ker
13 matches
Mail list logo