Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 04/12] eal: integrate bus scan and probe with EAL

Hi, ... ... diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c index 2206277..2c223de 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c ... +/* Scan all the buses for registering devices */ int +rte_eal_bus_scan(void) +{ + int re

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal : fix primary alive function

Hi Karim, Seems that you forget to send a patch in your mail, seems to be empty. Regards, Rami Rosen -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Harouat, Karim (Nokia - FR/Lannion) Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:07 To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATC

Re: [dpdk-dev] Accessing "device_id" from "rte_pci_device"

Hi, Santosh, Indeed the following patch from Ferruh removed the rte_pci_device from the rte_eth_dev_info object, and instead added an object of rte_device: http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/37654/ However, I see that the date that this patch was applied to dpdk-next-net/master is 4/10/2018. Ar

Re: [dpdk-dev] Accessing "device_id" from "rte_pci_device"

Hi Santhos. >There is no member named "device" in "rte_eth_dev_info" struct. I looked at >both 17.11 API >documentation >and 18.05 API >documentation. This is not accura

Re: [dpdk-dev] Accessing "device_id" from "rte_pci_device"

: Rosen, Rami Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Accessing "device_id" from "rte_pci_device" Hi Rami Rosen, et al, Thanks for the response. Yes I can see in the code that rte_device struct is part of rte_eth_dev_info. I tried to apply the patch you pointed o<%20h

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: remove unused function

Hi, Looks good to me. I noticed that the same is also with the rte_pci_detach() function, and I will send a patch to remove it as well. Regards, Rami Rosen -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 02:45 To: dev@

Re: [dpdk-dev] Testpmd fails in initialization

Hi Monika, > For last command I just declared 10 hugepages. This is not enough. I would suggest that you will try with 256 pages. I assume you have 2 sockets on the host (this can be verified by running "lspcu") and use 2MB hugepages. So, this can be done by: echo 256 > /sys/devices/system/no

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.08 Intel Roadmap

Hi, Tim, Thanks for posting the planned 18.08 roadmap, I hope other vendors will follow! >Allow Setup/Reconfiguration/Tear Down of Queues at Run Time - >Currently, to >configure a DPDK ethdev, the application specifies how >many Tx and Rx queues >to include prior to starting the device. This >f

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] ether: support runtime queue setup

Hi Qi, Thanks for these patches. See my comment below. -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Qi Zhang Sent: Monday, April 02, 2018 06:00 To: tho...@monjalon.net; Ananyev, Konstantin Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei ; Wu, Jingjing ; Lu, Wenzhuo ; Zhang, Qi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] app/testpmd: add command for queue setup

-Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Qi Zhang Sent: Monday, April 02, 2018 06:00 To: tho...@monjalon.net; Ananyev, Konstantin Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei ; Wu, Jingjing ; Lu, Wenzhuo ; Zhang, Qi Z Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] app/testpmd: ad

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/18] net/axgbe: add transmit and receive queue setup apis

One comment below. -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ravi Kumar Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 15:37 To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Yigit, Ferruh Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/18] net/axgbe: add transmit and receive queue setup apis Add support for data path

Re: [dpdk-dev] OPDL and 18.02 Release Notes

ead, it referred to the roadmap where it appeared as Optimized and not Ordered, but now there is a new roadmap of 18.05). Regards, Rami -Original Message- From: Ma, Liang J Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 16:43 To: Yigit, Ferruh Cc: Rosen, Rami ; dev@dpdk.org; tho...@monjalon.net;

Re: [dpdk-dev] Problem with using VF: Initialization Failure: -15

Hi, Michal, First, I believe that such questions suit better to the dpdk-users mailing list. >I've investigated the issue, and the problem is with: >diag = hw->mac.ops.reset_hw(hw); >which calls: >e1000_reset_hw_vf >and it calls: >e1000_read_posted_mbx >Which returns: E1000_ERR_MBX (-15) Are you

[dpdk-dev] OPDL and 18.02 Release Notes

Hi all, Following the recent announcement of DPDK 18.02-RC4, I went over 18.02 release notes and I have this minor query which I am not sure about: In the release notes: http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_02.html we have the following: ... The OPDL (Ordered Packet Distribution Library)

[dpdk-dev] backtracing from within the code

Hi, If you are willing to skip static methods and use the GCC backtrace, you can try this example (it worked for me, but it was quite a time ago): http://www.helicontech.co.il/?id=linuxbt Regards, Rami Rosen Intel Corporation -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On

[dpdk-dev] Can't build DPDK-16.04 on CentOS 6.8

Hi Thiago, > Any clue? Sure. This is the reason: in dpdk-16.04/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio we have: #ifndef PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE 16 #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_LOWER_ADDR 0 #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_UPPER_ADDR 4 #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_DATA

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] add writing registers

Please ignore, this is a wrong patch -Original Message- From: Rosen, Rami Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 8:24 PM To: dev at dpdk.org Cc: Rosen, Rami Subject: [PATCH 1/1] add writing registers Change-Id: Iaeeefcbc29d109fef17797d6a888cf2448499646 Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen --- fvlproto