On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 6:43 PM David Marchand
wrote:
>
> Hello,
Hi
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 9:53 PM Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
> >
> > On 08/07/20 17:03 +0500, Muhammad Bilal wrote:
> > > while using memif with app, the resources are not cleaned on exit,
> &g
divers e.g pci, so to solve this problem I have added the
functionality of calling remove() function of all the driver attached to
devices on vdev and pci buses.
Bugzilla ID: 353
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c | 23 +++
drivers/bus
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 5:04 PM Muhammad Bilal wrote:
>
> while using memif with app, the resources are not cleaned on exit,
> So an error occurred on running it second time. The cause of this problem
> is that remove() of memif driver is not called by rte_eal_cleanup() which
> is
Bugzilla ID: 437
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: bruce.richard...@intel.com
Cc: vipin.vargh...@intel.com
Cc: jgraj...@cisco.com
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
examples/l2fwd/main.c | 72 ++-
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 15 deletions
Bugzilla ID: 437
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: bruce.richard...@intel.com
Cc: vipin.vargh...@intel.com
Cc: jgraj...@cisco.com
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
examples/l2fwd/main.c | 76 ++-
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 16 deletions
Bugzilla ID: 477
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: jer...@marvell.com
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
doc/guides/eventdevs/index.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/eventdevs/index.rst b/doc/guides/eventdevs/index.rst
index 570905b81
-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
doc/guides/eventdevs/index.rst | 2 +-
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c| 2 +-
lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/eventdevs/index.rst b/doc/guides/eventdevs/index.rst
index 570905b81..bb66a5eac
Freeing the resources and call rte_eal_cleanup in case of error exit.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
examples/l2fwd-jobstats/main.c | 75 +++---
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/l2fwd-jobstats/main.c b/examples/l2fwd-jobstats
Freeing the resources and call rte_eal_cleanup in case of error exit.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
examples/l2fwd-keepalive/main.c | 97 +
1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/l2fwd-keepalive/main.c b/examples/l2fwd
Freeing the resources and call rte_eal_cleanup in case of error exit.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
examples/l2fwd-event/main.c | 43 ++---
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/l2fwd-event/main.c b/examples/l2fwd-event/main.c
Freeing the resources and call rte_eal_cleanup in case of error exit.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
examples/l2fwd-crypto/main.c | 54
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/l2fwd-crypto/main.c b/examples/l2fwd-crypto
Freeing the resources and call rte_eal_cleanup in case of error exit.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
examples/l2fwd-cat/l2fwd-cat.c | 32 ++--
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/l2fwd-cat/l2fwd-cat.c b/examples/l2fwd-cat/l2fwd
Recently I have submitted patches and some tests were failing on patchwork.
My question is, which tests are compulsory to pass for a patch to be accepted.
As in the below mentioned patch, it is accepted while 1 test was still failing.
http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/70348/
kind regards.
Muhammad
There was a duplicate command instruction in the documentation of memif
so I have removed the 1 command from it.
Fixes: cd3365d2 ("net/memif: enable loopback")
Cc: jmilan@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
doc/guides/nics/memif.rst | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletio
Thank you for your response.
How will we know if a patch is failing because of some failure in the
CI infrastructure or due to earlier merge?
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 1:59 AM Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2020 01:13:27 +0500
> Muhammad Bilal wrote:
>
> > Recentl
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 2:35 PM Sunil Kumar Kori wrote:
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Muhammad Bilal
> >Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:25 PM
> >To: declan.dohe...@intel.com; tomasz.kante...@intel.com; Pavan Nikhilesh
> >Bhagavatula ; Sunil Kumar Kori
Is there anything else to be done for acceptance? So that this problem
can be removed from other examples.
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 6:57 PM Muhammad Bilal wrote:
>
> Bugzilla ID: 437
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> Cc: bruce.richard...@intel.com
> Cc: vipin.vargh
Bugzilla ID: 432
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: john.mcnam...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
usertools/dpdk-setup.sh | 23 ++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/usertools/dpdk-setup.sh b/usertools/dpdk-setup.sh
index
Bugzilla ID: 353
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: hemant.agra...@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_pool_ops.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_pool_ops.c
b/lib/librte_mbuf
Bugzilla ID: 353
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: hemant.agra...@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_pool_ops.c | 12
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_pool_ops.c
b/lib/librte_mbuf
st the test fail and than get passed?
Patch address : http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/67893/
Bugzilla ID: 353
Thanks,
Muhammad Bilal
should we submit a patch for the 18.11 branch.
Patch address = http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/66978/
Bugzilla ID: 364
Regards,
Muhammad Bilal
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 3:01 PM Sunil Kumar Kori wrote:
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Muhammad Bilal
> >Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 5:57 PM
> >To: Sunil Kumar Kori
> >Cc: declan.dohe...@intel.com; tomasz.kante...@intel.com; Pavan Nikhilesh
> &
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:53 AM Sunil Kumar Kori wrote:
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Muhammad Bilal
> >Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 5:30 PM
> >To: Sunil Kumar Kori
> >Cc: declan.dohe...@intel.com; tomasz.kante...@intel.com; Pavan Nikhilesh
> &
While working on applications(l2fwd, testpmd) with PMD(memif, Tun|Tap
and some other) I have noticed that the .probe function of
rte_vdev_driver structure is called in rte_eal_init() and .remove
function of rte_vdev_driver structure is NEVER called, even after
exiting the application.
My Question
Yes, I have used the rte_eal_cleanup() function when application
exits. And still it does not call the .remove function of
rte_vdev_driver structure, used in PMD.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 11:11 PM Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:17:09 +0500
> Muhammad Bilal wrote:
&g
om
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
drivers/bus/vdev/rte_bus_vdev.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/vdev/rte_bus_vdev.h b/drivers/bus/vdev/rte_bus_vdev.h
index 2bc46530c..78a032cea 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/vdev/rte_bus_vdev.h
+++ b/driver
: 364
Cc: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: John McNamara
Cc: M: Luca Boccassi
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
v2:
* Added Details of branches for which patch is used.
* This patch is intended for v18.11 and v17.11 branches
mk/rte.sdkdoc.mk | 8 ++--
1 file changed
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 2:39 PM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 13:02 +0500, Muhammad Bilal wrote:
> > in doc-clean removing the folder which contain
> > the text files and no .rst files,
> > they cause problem When switching branches and compiling
> &g
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:02 PM Kevin Traynor wrote:
>
> On 20/03/2020 09:53, Muhammad Bilal wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 2:39 PM Luca Boccassi wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 13:02 +0500, Muhammad Bilal wrote:
> >>> in doc-clean removi
Bugzilla ID: 422
Cc: marko.kovace...@intel.com
Cc: john.mcnam...@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst
b/doc
Here I have corrected a misplaced argument of i40e_aq_get_phy_register()
This was also evident after seeing the datatype of its arguments.
Fixes: 98e60c0d43f1 ("net/i40e: add module EEPROM callbacks for i40e")
Cc: zijie@6wind.com
Bugzilla ID: 506
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
--
Yes, This is the patch for the same bug, Which is already fixed. So
this duplicate patch can be ignored.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 9:54 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
> On 7/14/2020 4:58 PM, Muhammad Bilal wrote:
> > Here I have corrected a misplaced argument of i40e_aq_get_phy_register()
Here I have removed 'that' from the sentence to make it grammatically
correct, as it seems to be a typing mistake
Fixes: d0dff9ba445e ("doc: sample application user guide")
Cc: bernard.iremon...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal
---
doc/guides/prog_guide/multi_
34 matches
Mail list logo
