Yes, This is the patch for the same bug, Which is already fixed. So
this duplicate patch can be ignored.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 9:54 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/14/2020 4:58 PM, Muhammad Bilal wrote:
> > Here I have corrected a misplaced argument of i40e_aq_get_phy_register()
> > This was also evident after seeing the datatype of its arguments.
> >
> > Fixes: 98e60c0d43f1 ("net/i40e: add module EEPROM callbacks for i40e")
> > Cc: zijie....@6wind.com
> >
> > Bugzilla ID: 506
> > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal <m.bi...@emumba.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > index 970a31cb2..5fdfadf7b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > @@ -12093,7 +12093,7 @@ static int i40e_get_module_eeprom(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > }
> > status = i40e_aq_get_phy_register(hw,
> > I40E_AQ_PHY_REG_ACCESS_EXTERNAL_MODULE,
> > - addr, offset, 1, &value, NULL);
> > + addr, 1, offset, &value, NULL);
> > if (status)
> > return -EIO;
> > data[i] = (uint8_t)value;
> >
>
> Hi Muhammad,
>
> This seems already fixed [1], can you please double check in the 'v20.08-rc1'?
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=2fc1d6da882563ab80786d69b6d7c9d0e4ce860a
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/72827/
