Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

On 23 February 2017 at 03:49, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2017-02-20 15:33, Joao Martins: > > On 02/17/2017 04:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > > >> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit : > > Is it time n

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

On 2 December 2015 at 12:05, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi, > just FYI - building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors. > > I don't know if that part of the tree is actively maintained - It is > default off, in the config template config/common_linuxapp. > > I'm not even entirely sure

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: fix the combined library problems by replacing it with a linker script

Hi Christian, You can count on me to help testing DPDK for Ubuntu, I have plans for it! I have some experience with Debian packaging too... I'm currently maintaining few Ubuntu PPAs, for fun...=) Also, I have hardware available, with 10G, 40G and 100G NIC cards and traffic generators. I

[dpdk-dev] Problem with new "make install" of DPDK 2.2.0-rc3 + XenVirt on 32-bit build is broken

Hey guys, I'm seeing that there are something wrong with "standard make install", look: --- cd dpdk-2.2.0-rc3 make T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc config sed -ri -e 's,(RTE_MACHINE=).*,\1"default",' \ -e 's,(RTE_APP_TEST=).*,\1n,' \ -e 's,(LIBRTE_VHOST=).*,\1y,' \

[dpdk-dev] Problem with new "make install" of DPDK 2.2.0-rc3 + XenVirt on 32-bit build is broken

On 8 December 2015 at 15:01, Piotr Bartosiewicz < piotr.bartosiewicz at atendesoftware.pl> wrote: > > cp: cannot stat >> ?/home/tmartins/sources/dpdk/2.2.0-rc3/dpdk-2.2.0-rc3/{mk,scripts}?: No >> such file or directory >> /home/tmartins/sources/dpdk/2.2.0-rc3/dpdk-2.2.0-rc3/mk/ >> rte.sdkinstall.m

[dpdk-dev] Problem with new "make install" of DPDK 2.2.0-rc3 + XenVirt on 32-bit build is broken

On 8 December 2015 at 17:03, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-12-08 18:01, Piotr Bartosiewicz: > > > > > cp: cannot stat > > > ?/home/tmartins/sources/dpdk/2.2.0-rc3/dpdk-2.2.0-rc3/{mk,scripts}?: No > > > such file or directory > > > /home/tmartins/sources/dpdk/2.2.0-rc3/dpdk-2.2.0-rc3/mk/ > > > rte

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

On 4 December 2015 at 21:56, Martinx - ? wrote: > > On 2 December 2015 at 12:05, Christian Ehrhardt > wrote: > > Hi, > > just FYI - building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors. > > > > I don't know if that part of the tree is actively maintained - It is > > default off, in the

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

On 9 December 2015 at 18:05, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-12-09 15:54, Martinx - ?: >> Sorry to insist on this subject but, the time for releasing DPDK 2.2 >> is near and DPDK build with Xen 32-bit is broken. >> >> If DPDK doesn't fix this, there will be no way to enable XenVirt >> support

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

On 10 December 2015 at 02:45, Xie, Huawei wrote: > On 12/10/2015 6:49 AM, Martinx - ? wrote: >> On 9 December 2015 at 18:05, Thomas Monjalon >> wrote: >>> 2015-12-09 15:54, Martinx - ?: Sorry to insist on this subject but, the time for releasing DPDK 2.2 is near and DPDK build

[dpdk-dev] Can't build DPDK-16.04 on CentOS 6.8

On 12 June 2016 at 11:30, Rosen, Rami wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > > Any clue? > > Sure. This is the reason: in dpdk-16.04/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio we > have: > > #ifndef PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE > #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE 16 > #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_LOWER_ADDR 0 > #define

[dpdk-dev] Can't build DPDK-16.04 on CentOS 6.8

On 13 June 2016 at 12:15, Martinx - ? wrote: > > > On 12 June 2016 at 11:30, Rosen, Rami wrote: > >> Hi Thiago, >> >> > Any clue? >> >> Sure. This is the reason: in dpdk-16.04/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio >> we have: >> >> #ifndef PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE >> #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] igb_uio: fix build with backported kernel

On 15 June 2016 at 11:59, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 6/15/2016 4:57 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > Following compile error observed with CentOS 6.8, which uses kernel > > kernel-devel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64: > > > > CC eal_thread.o > > .../build/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.c: > > In functio

[dpdk-dev] Can't build DPDK-16.04 on CentOS 6.8

On 16 June 2016 at 11:31, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 6/15/2016 7:59 PM, Martinx - ? wrote: > > On 13 June 2016 at 12:15, Martinx - ? > > mailto:thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 12 June 2016 at 11:30, Rosen, Rami > > wrote: > >

[dpdk-dev] Can't build DPDK-16.04 on CentOS 6.8

Guys, I'm trying to build DPDK-16.04 on CentOS 6.8, but it is failing, here is the error: --- ... == Build lib/librte_eal/linuxapp == Build lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal == Build lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio CC eal.o CC eal_hugepage_info.o CC eal_memory.o LD /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/dpdk-

[dpdk-dev] Can't build DPDK-16.04 on CentOS 6.8

On 3 June 2016 at 06:45, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 6/1/2016 9:07 PM, Martinx - ? wrote: > > Guys, > > > > I'm trying to build DPDK-16.04 on CentOS 6.8, but it is failing, here is > > the error: > > > > --- > > ... > > == Build lib/librte_eal/linuxapp > > == Build lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal >

[dpdk-dev] RFC: DPDK Long Term Support

On 7 June 2016 at 08:36, Christian Ehrhardt < christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Mcnamara, John > wrote: > [...] > > > > LTS Version > > > > > > The proposed initial LTS version will be DPDK 16.07. The next versions, > > based > > on a 2 yea

[dpdk-dev] Can't compile DPDK if both CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS and LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT are set to "yes"

Hello! My name is Thiago, I'm trying to compile DPDK 2.0, 2.1 and/or 2.2-rc1, on Ubuntu with Xen support but, it does not build... Also, initially, I'm using DPDK sources from Ubuntu APT repository but, it is also reproducible using upstream DPDK tarball as well, explained as follows: Problem:

[dpdk-dev] Can't compile DPDK if both CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS and LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT are set to "yes"

On 24 November 2015 at 13:22, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 11/24/2015 04:46 PM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: >> >> On 24/11/2015 13:57, Panu Matilainen wrote: >>> >>> On 11/23/2015 08:37 PM, Martinx - ? wrote: Hello! My name is Thiago, I'm trying to compile DPDK 2.0, 2.1 an

[dpdk-dev] Can't compile DPDK if both CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS and LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT are set to "yes"

On 24 November 2015 at 13:53, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 11/24/2015 05:30 PM, Martinx - ? wrote: >> >> On 24 November 2015 at 13:22, Panu Matilainen wrote: >>> >>> On 11/24/2015 04:46 PM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: On 24/11/2015 13:57, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > >>>

[dpdk-dev] Updating bnx2x firmware

Guys, Currently, the bnx2x.c driver looks for the following firmware files (when PMD is enabled for it): --- $ ~/sources/dpdk/dpdk-2.2.0/drivers/net/bnx2x$ grep lib\/firmware * bnx2x.c:#define FW_NAME_57711 "/lib/firmware/bnx2x/bnx2x-e1h-7.2.51.0.fw" bnx2x.c:#define FW_NAME_57810 "/lib/firmware/

[dpdk-dev] Updating bnx2x firmware

On 24 March 2016 at 19:03, Harish Patil wrote: > > > >Guys, > > > > Currently, the bnx2x.c driver looks for the following firmware files > >(when > >PMD is enabled for it): > > > >--- > >$ ~/sources/dpdk/dpdk-2.2.0/drivers/net/bnx2x$ grep lib\/firmware * > >bnx2x.c:#define FW_NAME_57711 "/lib/fir

[dpdk-dev] Crashing OVS+DPDK at the host, from inside of a KVM Guest

Guys, If using OVS 2.5 with DPDK 2.2, on Ubuntu Xenial, it is possible to crash the OVS running at the host, from inside of a KVM Guest. Basically, what I'm trying to do, is to run OVS+DPDK at the host, and also, inside of a KVM Guest, with multi-queue, but it doesn't work and crashes. Soon a

[dpdk-dev] If 1 KVM Guest loads the virtio-pci, on top of dpdkvhostuser OVS socket interface, it slows down everything!

Guys, I'm seeing a strange problem here, in my OVS+DPDK deployment, on top of Ubuntu 16.04 (DPDK 2.2 and OVS 2.5). Here is what I'm trying to do: run OVS with DPDK at the host, for KVM Guests that also, will be running more DPDK Apps. The host have 2 x 10G NICs, for OVS+DPDK and each KVM Gues

[dpdk-dev] [ovs-dev] If 1 KVM Guest loads the virtio-pci, on top of dpdkvhostuser OVS socket interface, it slows down everything!

Hello Bhanu, I'm a little bit confused, you said that the problem can be fixed but, later, you also said that: "On a Multi VM setup even with the above patch applied, one might see aggregate throughput difference when vNIC is bind to igb_uio vs virtio-pci"... My idea is to use OVS with DPDK i

[dpdk-dev] [ovs-dev] If 1 KVM Guest loads the virtio-pci, on top of dpdkvhostuser OVS socket interface, it slows down everything!

Answers inline, as follows: On 30 May 2016 at 12:44, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash < bhanuprakash.bodireddy at intel.com> wrote: > *From:* Martinx - ? [mailto:thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, May 30, 2016 5:01 PM > *To:* Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash > *Cc:* Christian Ehrhardt ; < > dev a