Hello,
In DPDK when we use mmap why are we passing the MAP_FIXED flag when Linux man
page itself says that the option is discouraged? Any specific reason for
passing the MAP_FIXED flag?
http://linux.die.net/man/2/mmap
MAP_FIXED
Don't interpret addr as a hint: place the mapping at exactly that
Hi,
I have a query-why Linux top command does not show the NUMA pages allocated by
a DPDK process in Resident Memory? Is it a missing functionality in Linux top
command or some limitation, Please excuse my ignorance if I missed something
very obvious?
As an example if I allocated 512 NUMA page
Hi,
Given the popularity of Docker it would be nice if we can run DPDK inside a
Docker container but the challenge is the igb_uio.ko and rte_kni.ko kernel
modules which need to be compiled with the exact kernel source running on the
host. Are there ways to seamlessly run DPDK with Docker? I ca
[mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 12:12 AM
To: Karmarkar Suyash
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Running DPDK with Docker
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:56:56 +0000
Karmarkar Suyash wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Given the popularity of Docker it would be nice if w
Hello,
Can you please review the change and let me know if any comments. I would like
to push this patch to 16.11 release. Thanks. Please note this fix is tested as
well.
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
_
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016
Thanks Reshma for the comments, the issue is a day one bug. I will correct the
fixes line and submit v2 of the patch.
-Original Message-
From: Pattan, Reshma [mailto:reshma.pat...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 5:28 AM
To: Karmarkar Suyash
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
behavior.
Fixes:ba885531ac26 ("rte_timer: timer lag issue")
Karmarkar Suyash (1):
Signed-off-by: Karmarkar Suyash
lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
behavior.
Fixes:ba885531ac26 ("rte_timer: timer lag issue")
Karmarkar Suyash (1):
Signed-off-by: Karmarkar Suyash
lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hello,
I corrected the fixes line, Can you please review the change and if no further
comments can you please let me know the next steps. Thanks.
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-Original Message-
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 12:02 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc
behavior.
Fixes: 9b15ba89 ("timer: use a skip list")
Karmarkar Suyash (1):
Signed-off-by: Karmarkar Suyash
lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -
Hello,
Can you please review the changes and suggest next steps? Thanks
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-Original Message-
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:54 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org; thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; rsanford at akamai.com;
reshma.pattan at intel.com
Hello All,
When a outgoing packet is sent with data Len more than 1514 which will be a
case in VLAN (Max 1518 ) the packet is getting dropped because of the below
code snippet. This looks incorrect as in case of VLAN .
FUNCTION NAME: vmxnet3_xmit_pkts
/* Needs to minus ether header len */
if(txm->pkt.data_len >
> (hw->cur_mtu + ETHER_HDR_LEN + 4 /* 4 bytes for VLAN */)) {
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 6:17 PM
To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
Subject: Bug in outgoing packet with vmxnet3 with VLAN tagging
H
Hello All,
If there are two identical IPv6 rules with source and destination IP addresses
as wild card but with different priority, then during lookup always the rule
that is added first in TRIE is returned even though the second rule that has
highest priority.
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
,
.offset = sizeof(struct ipv6_hdr) + 2*sizeof (uint32_t),
}
} ;
-Original Message-
From: Ananyev, Konstantin [mailto:konstantin.anan...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:16 PM
To: Karmarkar Suyash; dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Dey, Souvik; Patil, PraveenKumar
Subject: RE: Bug in I
Hi Konstantin,
We did even tried with DPDK-1.7.0 version still we faced the same issue.
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-Original Message-
From: Ananyev, Konstantin [mailto:konstantin.anan...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 8:15 PM
To: Karmarkar Suyash; dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Dey
Hello All,
I am trying some experiments with DPDK 1.6 and Cisco NIC - (:06:00.0
Network controller: Cisco Systems Inc. Cisco VIC Ethernet NIC [vmnic0]), on the
guest I am using VMXNET3 as interface/pmd and one weird behavior that is see is
with VMWare ESX 5.5 DPDK is not able to initialize
NIC is not
coming up and initialization fails? Thanks.
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2013-July/000302.html
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 9:03 AM
To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
Subject: DPDK 1.6 and Cisco VIC-NIC pmd fails to initialize with VMWare ESX 5.5
Hello
versions 5.5 and 6.0.
Error is rte_eth_dev_start error = -1
Regards
Suyash
-Original Message-
From: Patel, Rashmin N [mailto:rashmin.n.pa...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 11:50 PM
To: Karmarkar Suyash ; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: DPDK 1.6 and Cisco VIC-NIC pmd fails
---
lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c b/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c
index 43da836..18782fa 100644
--- a/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c
+++ b/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c
@@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ void rte_timer_ma
period,
+ __rte_timer_reset(tim, tim->expire + tim->period,
tim->period, lcore_id, tim->f, tim->arg, 1);
rte_spinlock_unlock(&priv_timer[lcore_id].list_lock);
}
--
Karmarkar Suyash (1):
Signed-off-by: Karmarkar Suyash
--
2.9.3.windows.1
behavior.
Fixes:rte_timer: timer lag issue
Karmarkar Suyash (1):
Signed-off-by: Karmarkar Suyash
lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From ba885531ac26af1aabc6bd0f58d7ce744b04acf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016
Hello All,
Can you please review the change and let me know if any comments. I would like
to push this patch to 16.07 release. Thanks
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-Original Message-
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 9:27 AM
To: rsanford at akamai.com
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Hello Robert/Thomas,
Can you please review the changes in V2 of the Patch and suggest next steps?
Thanks
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-Original Message-
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 10:27 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org; thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; rsanford at
Thanks !! So as next steps I will push the patch .
-Original Message-
From: Sanford, Robert [mailto:rsanf...@akamai.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:40 PM
To: Karmarkar Suyash ; dev at dpdk.org;
thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; reshma.pattan at intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2
25 matches
Mail list logo
