Hi All,
We are seeing a weird issue where the link status of 82599 NIC in SR-IOV
mode in VmWare is coming as UP even though the vmnic is taken DOWN in the ESXi.
This is working fine when we use a linux to handle the interface inside of
DPDK. We are using DPDK 18.11.6 and seeing this issue s
Hi All,
Trying to test E810 Sr-IOV based nic card with 20.11.3 dpdk. I am running
the host kernel driver and only the VF is attached to the VM where I am running
dpdk. But when I attaching the VF to the testpmd it is throwing the below
error. Is there are way to move forward here ?
[root@c
: [ 323.376403] vfio-pci: probe of :08:00.0
failed with error -22
Sep 24 01:50:29 connexip kernel: [ 323.376440] vfio-pci: probe of :08:00.0
failed with error -22
I am using kernel 4.19.194 from debian buster.
From: Wu, Jingjing
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 8:41 PM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev
ds,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: dev On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 1:57 AM
To: Wu, Jingjing ; dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dpdk-dev] Not able to start IAVF PMD with dpdk 20.11.3
With vfio_pci , I am getting the following error and b
From: Souvik Dey
As the internal MAC table is divided into Unicast and Multicast address
sections, we should check the type of synched MAC address before storing
it to the internal table. Currently the check is not done, and the
synched MAC of 33:33:00:00:00:01 gets stored in the unicast section
From: Souvik Dey
As the internal MAC table is divided into Unicast and Multicast address
sections, we should check the type of synched MAC address before storing
it to the internal table. Currently the check is not done, and the
synched MAC of 33:33:00:00:00:01 gets stored in the unicast section
he patch itself as you have already
acked ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: dev On Behalf Of Slava Ovsiienko
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 3:04 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Raslan Darawsheh ; Matan
Azrad
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] c
From: Souvik Dey
[ upstream commit 493f0bb51c1144eedcff2bba199cab1b64ff9fd0 ]
As the internal MAC table is divided into Unicast and Multicast address
sections, we should check the type of synched MAC address before storing
it to the internal table. Currently the check is not done, and the
synche
From: Souvik Dey
[ upstream commit 493f0bb51c1144eedcff2bba199cab1b64ff9fd0 ]
As the internal MAC table is divided into Unicast and Multicast address
sections, we should check the type of synched MAC address before storing
it to the internal table. Currently the check is not done, and the
synche
Hi All,
We were trying to test the vlan filter with Melloanox
nic(SR-IOV) on VmWare using the mlx5_pmd. But found that after doing the
mlx5_vlan_filter_set with the vlan id also, we are not receiving the tagged
packets upto the application. The same works fine in we are using KV
Hi All,
I am trying to support multicast packet over SRIOV using kernel
PF + DPDK VF(ixgbevf) drivers for ipv6. I am currently using 2.1 DPDK and found
that there was a patch in 16.04 for "ixgbe: support multicast promiscuous mode
on VF". So I have backported the patch to the 2.1
Adding wenzhuo...@intel.com<mailto:wenzhuo...@intel.com>
From: Dey, Souvik
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 12:27 PM
To: 'dev@dpdk.org'
Subject: ixgbevf: support multicast packets from PF to VF
Hi All,
I am trying to support multicast packet over SRIOV using kern
Hi All,
We have a single primary application with multiple secondary
applications launched on the same cpu core. When the system boots up for the
first time ,the primary comes up followed by the secondary process everything
works fine. But in between if I try to restart the secon
: Sunday, December 4, 2016 9:02 PM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: ixgbevf: support multicast packets from PF to VF
Hi Souvik,
To my opinion, rte_eth_dev_set_mc_addr_list has nothing to do with
rte_eth_allmulticast_enable. rte_eth_allmulticast_enable is enough for the
multicast
required to be done (both in DPDK or on PF) to get this working all the
configured MC_ADDRs ?
I am using 2.1 DPDK on the guest and kernel 4.4 ixgbe PF drivers on the host .
--
Regards,
Souvik
From: Lu, Wenzhuo [mailto:wenzhuo...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 6:35 PM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev
Hi ,
I am trying to do rte_pktmbuf_alloc from a mempool within a
secondary process after doing a rte_mempool_lookup for the same mempool. But
the rte_pktmbuf_alloc crashes with the below backtrace
#0 0x in ?? ()
#1 0x00423da2 in rte_mempool_ops_dequeue_bul
Hi ,
I am trying to do rte_pktmbuf_alloc from a mempool within a
secondary process after doing a rte_mempool_lookup for the same mempool. But
the rte_pktmbuf_alloc crashes with the below backtrace
#0 0x in ?? ()
#1 0x00423da2 in rte_mempool_ops_dequeue_bul
Hi Liu/Stephen/Mark,
I have submitted Version 7 of this patch. Do let me know if this looks
proper.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Dey, Souvik
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 4:32 PM
To: mark.b.kavanagh at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; stephen at
Yes this patch definitely solves my issue too.
-Original Message-
From: Mcnamara, John [mailto:john.mcnam...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 7:00 AM
To: Mussar, Gary ; Dey, Souvik ;
Stephen Hemminger
Cc: nhorman at tuxdriver.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev
-Original Message-
From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 3:58 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; stephen at networkplumber.org;
huawei.xie at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] add mtu set
: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 3:06 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; stephen at networkplumber.org
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] add mtu set in virtio
Hi Souvik,
On 09/02/2016 12:20 AM, Dey, Souvik wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> W
recommend to submit an updated version or this is fine ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 11:38 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH
Ok will change it. Do I need to submit a new v4 for that ? can I put your name
also in the reviewed by list?
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 11:43 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at
Ok thanks understood. I will submit v4 for this.
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 11:54 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3]virtio:add mtu set in
Hi Liu,
Submitted the version 4 of the patch as you suggested , and have
removed the Reviewed by line.
I have still kept the function definition as to follow the same suit as we have
done for other eth_dev_ops.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Dey, Souvik
Sent
: Thursday, September 8, 2016 3:57 AM
To: Maxime Coquelin
Cc: Dey, Souvik ; stephen at networkplumber.org;
huawei.xie at intel.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] add mtu set in virtio
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:50:34AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
> On 09/08/2016
Hi,
I have having an unique issue to get the VLAN tags upto the VM
instance running ixgbevf pmd. Currently my setup looks like this :
Host running 7.1 RHEL , linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 with 10G 82599ES NIC cards
with firmware : 0x8838 and ixgbe driver version 4.0.1-k-rh7.1
Gu
et,
.stats_get = virtio_dev_stats_get,
--
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 3:00 AM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set
io_dev_stats_get,
--
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Kavanagh, Mark B [mailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 11:05 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in
ailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 11:44 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio
>
>Hi Mark,
>
>Yes I thought I did that change. Sorry once again.. making too
Hi All,
Any further comments or updates to be made in the below patch else I
will go ahead a submit the v5 for the same.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 2:16 PM
To: Kavanagh
-Original Message-
From: Kavanagh, Mark B [mailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 10:48 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio
>
>Hi Ma
Hi Mark/Liu,
Is there any further comments to the below patch ? Should I submit it
as v5 of the patch ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 11:12 AM
To: Kavanagh, Mark B
Hi Mark/Liu,
I know this might be a redundant question, but should I put your names
in the Reviewed-by section in v5 ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Kavanagh, Mark B [mailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:16 AM
To: Dey, Souvik
I have already taken care of this in v5 of the patch , If possible please
review the same .
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 3:12 AM
To: Kavanagh, Mark B
Cc: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org; stephen at
Answers inline.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7:22 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: mark.b.kavanagh at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at
dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net
Hi All,
I am sending git send-mail and the patch mail is also getting
sent but I am not able see the patch in the patchwork link. Can someone point
what might have gone wrong. It was working fine earlier though.
Thanks in advance for any kind of help.
--
Regards,
Souvik
as that will be valid for
both vlan offload on and off cases.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 9:45 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: mark.b.kavanagh at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at
dpdk.org
Sub
.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 5:08 AM
To: Yuanhan Liu ; Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio
>
>On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:45:05PM -0700, Steph
Hi All,
Any further updates/comments on this ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 11:21 PM
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: Dey, Souvik ; Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH
Hi Stephen,
So what should be my next steps , should I submit a v7 for this patch
or you suggest otherwise.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 2:57 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: Kavanagh
OK sure will do that.
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 7:12 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; Kavanagh, Mark B
; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio
On Tue, Sep
Hi All,
Do we have the Hyper-V DPDK PMD available now in 17.05 release.
I don't see the drivers present. Can someone update me on the status of the
same and if it already there in any active DPDK release ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
Hi Ferruh/Lu,
I see that both of you have posted multiple patches in DPDK wrt
IXGBE SR-IOV and PF to VF link status/ I am trying to use DPDK 16.11 and do see
that it has the support of both pinging VF when PF link status changes and also
VF support of mailbox msg when PF link is
Hi All,
As DPDK 16.11 is an LTS release is there any plans to backport
the VM-BUS and HyperV PMD from 17.05 to 16.11.
--
Regards,
Souvik
Ok thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 12:10 AM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Query on VM_BUS and HyperV PMD
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:23:36AM +, Dey, Souvik wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
In DPDK 1.7 , while using the vmxnet3 pmd on vmware Esxi 5.5
update 3 we are seeing that activation of the device fails.
status = VMXNET3_READ_BAR1_REG(hw, VMXNET3_REG_CMD); return a non zero status.
Though the normal vmxnet3.ko works fine in the same system. Any idea if anyo
I have also tried with DPDK 2.1 but the result is same.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 10:54 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Vmxnet3 activation of device fails in DPDK1.7
, December 11, 2015 12:07 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Vmxnet3 activation of device fails in DPDK1.7
On 12/10/15, 2:22 AM, "dev on behalf of Dey, Souvik" wrote:
>Hi,
>In DPDK 1.7 , while using the vmxnet3 pmd on vmware Esxi 5.5
&
issue ?
-Original Message-
From: Yong Wang [mailto:yongw...@vmware.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 11:57 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Vmxnet3 activation of device fails in DPDK1.7
nb_rx_desc should be less or equal to 2048 in update 3 due to a change in
Hi All,
I am currently facing issues with getting the multicast IPv6
packets when using the i40evf pmd.
I do see there is a limitation mentioned in the release notes of DPDK that
16.27. I40e VF may not receive packets in the promiscuous mode
Description:
Promiscuous mode is not s
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 2:33 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; us...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets
NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender
Hi,
Did you enable
Moreover I wanted to mention one more thing, that the issue of multicast
packets not working is only with DPDK 140eVF PMD. In case I use the i40evf of
the kernel then it is working fine and I don’t see any issues with v6. So why
is the trust mode a requirement for DPDK pmd ?
From: Dey, Souvik
think vanilla linux driver (i40evf) is using promiscuous mode to
receive multicast packets.
--
Regards,
Souvik
From: Ruinan Hu
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 3:36 PM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Ruinan
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; us...@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-users] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets
have rte_eth_allmulticast_enable()
enabled but without any success.
--
Regards,
Souvik
From: Dey, Souvik
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:06 AM
To: Ruinan Hu ; Ruinan
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; us...@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-users] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets
Hi Ruinan
Hi i40e/i40evf maintainers,
I was testing VLANs with i40evf pmd and is hitting the below issue.
I have the following configuration:
- host runs with Linux pf i40e driver(version 2.4.6)
- guest runs with DPDK 17.11.2 vf i40e driver
When I am sending a vlan packet from the outside to the guest, on
/broadcast promisc mode is disabled by default.
--
Regard,
Souvik
From: Xing, Beilei [mailto:beilei.x...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 3:58 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Wu, Jingjing ;
dev@dpdk.org
Cc: us...@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: I40evf VLAN stripping disable
NOTICE
Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 2:17 PM
To: Dey, Souvik ; j...@semihalf.com; j...@semihalf.com;
neta...@amazon.com; evge...@amazon.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] drivers/net/ena: Copy PCI info to
Hi All,
I see few patches in the DPDK regarding "Implement device reset
on VF" and also "support reset of VF link" but I am not sure which version of
DPDK is having the changes. Are they at all upstreamed or they are still under
discussion. I am currently using DPDK 16.11, and faci
Hi All,
While trying call load with virtio_pmd/vmxnet3_pmd , I am
seeing that at around 100Mbps, we are having tx_burst errors. We are currently
using DPDK 2.1 and send 1 packet at a time. When we try the same with ixgbe_vf
we are not seeing similar drops. Is there any issues wi
So is there no resolution to this issue ?
-Original Message-
From: Tan, Jianfeng [mailto:jianfeng@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 2:18 PM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: tx_burst errors seen with virtual pmds
Hi Souvik,
> -Original Mess
Hi,
Does the rte_kni kernel module support multi-segment mbufs ? If
not is there any plan to do so ? Also I see that the pmds are supporting jumbo
frames but if kni does not support multi-segment mbufs then how the jumbo
frames will be given up to the kernel ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
Hi All,
I was trying out handling of jumbo packets in DPDK, but I came
across an issue where I see that the multiple segmented mbufs are not supported
in the rte_kni and due to which the packets are not properly handled/converted
to skb before giving it to the kernel. Is there an
Hi All,
There looks like an issue will rte_kni.ko which gets kernel
into deadlock. We are trying to run rte_kni.ko with multiple thread support
which are pinned to different non-isolated cores. When we test with tcp/tls the
kernel is getting hanged in on race condition. Below is
...@infiniteio.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 1:41 AM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Kernel deadlock due to rte_kni
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013335.html
Jay
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Dey, Souvik mailto:sodey at sonusnet.com>> wrote:
Do you see any benefit of calling netif_rx_ni() and not directly netif_rx() ?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhor...@tuxdriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:16 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Kernel deadlock due to rte_kni
On Wed, Mar
Thanks got your point then we should be changing this in DPDK also as in 1.8 we
are using netif_rx in rte_kni.c.
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhor...@tuxdriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 5:51 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev
Hi,
In DPDK1.6 do we support overlapped fragments while doing
reassembly. Also why we don't consider the first or last fragment to be
out-of-order. Are this known limitations in DPDK or they are not working due to
some bugs in the code ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
...@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 4:54 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Patil, PraveenKumar
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] FW: BUG in IP FRAGMENTATION
ME TOO, I HAVE A BUG WITH CAPS LOCK ;)
2014-10-15 11:06, Dey, Souvik:
> In DPDK1.6 do we support overlapped fragments while do
Any plans to support this in future in DPDK fragmentation code ?
-Original Message-
From: Ananyev, Konstantin [mailto:konstantin.anan...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:49 PM
To: Dey, Souvik; Thomas Monjalon
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Patil, PraveenKumar
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev
Hi,
Is there any particular reason of nor supporting the
RTE_PCI_DRV_INTR_LSC for vmxnet3. I can see we have introduced the same for the
other virtual driver virtio but not for vmxnet3. Do we have some technical
difficulties there ? Can someone throw some light on this.
--
Rega
Hi All,
I am currently facing a weird issue where I am not able to bind
the virtio_pci device to igb_uio in DPDK1.7 on QEMU/KVM. I can see there are
two fold issues.
1.The pci_unbind.py script where the virt_path is removed from 1.6 to 1.7
version due to which the initial status
uesday, April 14, 2020 2:37 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev@dpdk.org; us...@dpdk.org
Cc: Yigit, Ferruh ; Zhang, Qi Z
Subject: RE: i40eVF pmd vlan id handling
NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender
Hi Souvik,
With kerne
Jacob
Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2020 9:10 AM
To: Rasesh Mody
Cc: Dey, Souvik ; Shahed Shaikh ; Jerin
Jacob Kollanukkaran ; ferruh.yi...@intel.com;
tho...@monjalon.net; dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH] net/bnx2x: add multicast MAC address
filtering
From: Souvik Dey
In case of bnx2xvf pmd, tx packets can support vland id in 2 ways:
1. setting the mbuf ol_flags=PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT and passing the
vlanid in mbuf->vlan_tci.
2. the tx packet itself has the vlan id included in the packet.
The first case is working as expected but the second case wher
: Dey, Souvik
Cc: Rasesh Mody ; Shahed Shaikh ;
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran ; ferruh.yi...@intel.com;
tho...@monjalon.net; dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/bnx2x: handle guest vlan for SR-IOV case
NOTICE: This email was received
Hi All,
I am using DPDK 18.11.2 and i40e PF linux driver on the host 2.4.6. I
see there, when I enable DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER from the DPDK app, and then
configure the specific vlan id using rte_eth_dev_vlan_filter(). As per DPDK
code by default when we do dev_configure, we call i40e
p(dev);
+ }
return err;
}
Or we need to call . vlan_offload_set after doing . vlan_filter_set from the
DPDK app ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
From: Dey, Souvik
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 12:04 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org; us...@dpdk.org; beilei.x...@intel.com
Cc: ferruh.yi...@intel.com; qi.z.zh...@intel
is included in thetx packets itself was found not
working as expected. To handle that we need to properly set the
start_bd bitfield and the vlan_or_ethertype instead of setting it
to just the ethertype in case of VF.
Signed-off-by: "Dey, Souvik"
---
drivers/net/bnx2x
is included in thetx packets itself was found not
working as expected. To handle that we need to properly set the
start_bd bitfield and the vlan_or_ethertype instead of setting it
to just the ethertype in case of VF.
Signed-off-by: "Dey, Souvik"
---
v2:
* Fixed complitaion issues
e
is included in thetx packets itself was found not
working as expected. To handle that we need to properly set the
start_bd bitfield and the vlan_or_ethertype instead of setting it
to just the ethertype in case of VF.
Signed-off-by: "Dey, Souvik"
---
v2:
* Fix compilation issues.
Add support the set_mc_addr_list device operation in the bnx2xvf PMD.
The configured addresses are stored in the device private area, so
they can be flushed before adding new ones.
Without this v6 multicast packets were properly forwarded to the
Guest VF.
Signed-off-by: "Dey, S
is included in thetx packets itself was found not
working as expected. To handle that we need to properly set the
start_bd bitfield and the vlan_or_ethertype instead of setting it
to just the ethertype in case of VF.
Signed-off-by: "Dey, Souvik"
---
v2:
* Fix compilation issues.
Hi All,
After upgrading to DPDK 18.11.6 LTS release from 18.11.2 the
link_update call for link status update is not working for X550 NICs SR-IOV
enabled. On debugging it looks like the change introduced as a part of this
patch is causing the issue.
https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/
]: Intel Corporation X550 Virtual Function
[8086:1565]
So the mac_type is ixgbe_mac_X550_vf in the below case.
--
Regards,
Souvik
From: Dey, Souvik
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 1:17 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: xiaolong...@intel.com; xiao.zh...@intel.com; us...@dpdk.org
Subject: Issue with X550
18.11.6 which breaks
the ixgbevf link status. When is plan for 18.11.7 or updated 18.11.6 as we
should not have a broken release.
--
Regads,
Souvik
From: Dey, Souvik
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 4:08 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: xiaolong...@intel.com; xiao.zh...@intel.com; us...@dpdk.org; Stephen
you check
by setting the above offload and if that helps you .
--
Thanks,
Souvik
From: Yan Fridland
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 8:34 AM
To: Dey, Souvik
Subject: RE: i40eVF pmd vlan id handling
NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender
Thanks will do that. And will also try to remove the trailer in the patches.
Thanks for pointing it out.
From: dev On Behalf Of Rasesh Mody
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 6:01 PM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Shahed Shaikh ; Jerin
Jacob Kollanukkaran ; ferruh.yi...@intel.com;
tho...@monjalon.net
Cc: dev
Hi All,
Is there any plan to support ethtool for other drivers apart from
igb/ixgbe for kni interfaes ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
Hi Yigit,
I was facing the kernel crash issue, at skb_over_put(), using
dpdk using 18.11 on 4.19.28 kernel. On checking I did find this patch and this
patch is solving the issue also. But then I saw you comment in the patch and
that’s looks scary to have the patch. Is there any im
Hi All,
I am using DPDK 18.11 with linux kernel 4.19.28. I have kni
devices created and I can see a crash in the kernel with ipv6/v4 fragmented
packets. Does anyone seen this already or is there any fixes/patches available
for this .
Snippet of kernel panic
Message from syslogd@
Was there any update to this patch , I am also seeing kernel crash in
kni_net_rx_normal dueing skb_put which is happening for chained mbufs.
--
Regards,
Souvik
From: dev On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 12:31 PM
To: Yangchao Zhou ; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [
Hi,
I am trying to get tagged packets to work in SRIOV mode. I am using dpdk 2.1
version with an application on KVM.
The setup is as below: The same configuration works for untagged packets.
Guest VM (Virtual Function/Created tagged kni interfaces)--- > KVM host (PF/no
tag on the VF ) --
ut Dpdk. Any other
suggestions ?
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Wenzhuo [mailto:wenzhuo...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 8:33 PM
To: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: VLAN with ixgbevf pmd
Hi Souvik,
Take testpmd for example, normally we
: Dey, Souvik
Cc: nhorman at tuxdriver.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] dpdk-devbind.py: Virtio interface issue.
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:25:46 -0400
souvikdey33 wrote:
> +#The path for virtio devices are different. Get the correct path.
> + virtio = "/
Saturday, August 27, 2016 8:16 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: huawei.xie at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] add mtu set in virtio
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:54:28 -0400
souvikdey33 wrote:
> This functionality is required mostly in the cloud in
lease guide with the
next steps.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: huawei.xie at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PA
s.listdir(virtio_sys_path))
else:
device["Interface"] = ""
# check if a port is used for ssh connection
-Original Message-
From: Mussar, Gary [mailto:gmus...@ciena.com]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 11:10 AM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Stephen Hemminger
Cc:
Hi All,
There is a test plan for the performance tests of different
scenarios with AF_XDP in the dpdk docs
https://doc.dpdk.org/dts/test_plans/af_xdp_test_plan.html , but I am not able
to find the test results of the same. Can anyone please help in sharing the
results link for t
Hi Guo,
Thanks for the comments. I will upload a v2 of the patch.
--
Regards,
Souvik
From: Guo, Jia
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 10:08 PM
To: Dey, Souvik ; Xing, Beilei ; Zhang,
Qi Z
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
