Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: add nanosleep in main loop

2017-11-10 Thread Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
On 11/10/2017 10:12 AM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote: > Since testpmd is a development tool not supposed to run in a production > environment, is there really a need for it to be patched to work around a > (temporary) Linux kernel bug? >From the kernel side... not even... > If so, why is I/O the only f

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: add nanosleep in main loop

2017-11-10 Thread Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
On 11/10/2017 11:14 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > Agree with Adrian here - the patch doesn't fix the problem in any case, I would agree with you if it were possible to assume one can fully isolate a CPU on Linux... but it is not... This: https://lwn.net/Articles/659490/ is still an open iss