Some firmware versions can support the selection of Rx profile
during Rx and AGG ring allocation.
Check if the firmware sets the
HWRM_FUNC_QCAPS_OUTPUT_FLAGS_EXT3_RX_RATE_PROFILE_SEL_SUPPORTED flag
and set the new Rx profile.
Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde
Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek
---
drivers
I tested below 18 scenarios on RHEL 9.2/RHEL 9.4 hosts and didn't find any
new dpdk issues.
- VM with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size):
PASS
- VM with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) :
PASS
- VM with device assignment(VF) throughp
Hi Danylo,
Could you please resend the v2 of the patchset? I'm not sure why, but for some
reason the patches are missing in patchwork. I also cannot find them on
http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/
Best regards,
Dariusz Sosnowski
> -Original Message-
> From: Danylo Vodopianov
> Sent: Monday, N
This patch adds the ‘link_period’ devargs to adjust the link update
period (microseconds), when the value is less than or equal to 0
it will be disabled, by default it is not enabled.
This patch is based on DPDK 24.07.0
[b3485f4293997d35b6daecc3437bb0c183a51fb3], for customer cherry-pick.
Signed-
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2024 5:26 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Bruce Richardson ; sta...@dpdk.org; Naga
> Harish K S V ; Jerin Jacob ;
> Nikhil Rao
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] eventdev: fix possible array underflow/overflow
>
> If
> -Original Message-
> From: Hemant Agrawal
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2024 1:15 PM
> To: tho...@monjalon.net; dev@dpdk.org; david.march...@redhat.com
> Cc: step...@networkplumber.org; Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l2fw
It seems that you're not registered to stable mailing list.
Could you please register on that list and try again?
You can use this link to register: https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable
> From: Danylo Vodopianov
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 11:48
> To: Dariusz Sosnowski ; NBU-Contact-Thom
If actions provided to “flow update…“ command contained an age
action, then testpmd did not update the age action context
accordingly.
Thus "flow aged destroy" command can not
execute successfully.
Fix was done with next steps
1. Generate new port flow entry to add/replace action(s).
2. Set age
Avoid removal of additional flows after requested number of flows has
been already removed.
port_flow_destroy() function goes through all flows and compares
given flow ‘id’ with them. However in some cases it can advance pointer
with “given ID” and thus remove additional flow.
port_flow_destroy()
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bing Zhao
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 07:53
> To: Dariusz Sosnowski ; Slava Ovsiienko
> ; dev@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh
>
> Cc: Ori Kam ; Suanming Mou ;
> Matan Azrad ; Maayan Kashani
>
> Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix the leak of action data list
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo